1. bookVolume 12 (2017): Issue 1 (June 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1857-8462
First Published
01 Jul 2005
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Resolving Marital Conflicts

Published Online: 11 May 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 12 (2017) - Issue 1 (June 2017)
Page range: 69 - 80
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1857-8462
First Published
01 Jul 2005
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Couple relations are characterized as relations of an intimate nature dominated by constant interaction or strong interdependence and mutual influence of intense feelings between spouses. In marriages where there is conflict, there are typical examples of interaction, which result in high proportion of negative communicative acts that affect the quality of marital relationships such as: loss of confidence, the emergence of frustration, feelings of anxiety, discomfort, leading to escalation of marital conflicts. Communication as a variable has a large impact on the resolution of marital conflicts. The obtained results of our research indicate that the choice of different strategies of behavior in conflict situations among our respondents primarily depend on: the degree of persistence in the pursuit of its own interests and level of cooperation in addressing the interests of others.

In accordance with the model of behavior in conflict situations, spouses also chose the styles for resolving them. Spouses who perceive (consider) that they communicate openly unlike spouses who do not practice open communication, use the competition as a model of behavior in conflict situations and support rivalry as a style for conflict resolution. The choice of rivalry style as a style for resolving marital conflicts, among our respondents appears as a reflection of expressed wish for having an open fight for the realization of their interests, especially when it comes to the limitation of their rights by their spouses, failure to fulfill the emotional needs (lack of love, care, attention, understanding).

But, the duration of the marital relationship as a dimension does not affect the use of certain styles for resolving marital conflicts among our respondents.

Keywords

• Straus, M. A. (2005). Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales. U: R. K. Bergen, J. L. Edleson i C. M. Renzetti (ur.). Violence against women: Classic papers (str. 187-197). Boston: Pearson Education Inc.Search in Google Scholar

• Wilmot, W. W., Hocker, J. L. (2007). Interpersonal Conflict. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

• Notarius, C. I., Lashley, S. L. & Sullivan, D. J. (1997). Angry at your partner? Think again. U: Sternberg, R. J. & Hojjat, M. (ur.); Satisfaction in Close Relationships. NewYork: The Guilford Press, 219-249.Search in Google Scholar

• Šakotić-Kurbalija, J. (2011). Karakteristike bračnog odnosa i traženje psihološke pomoći. Doktorska disertacija. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.Search in Google Scholar

• Gottman, J. M. (1994). What Predicts Divorce? The Relationship between Marital Processes and Marital Outcomes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumSearch in Google Scholar

• Karney, B. R. i Bradbury, T. N. (1995.). The longitudinal course of marital quality and stability: A review of theory, method and research. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 118, 3-34.10.1037/0033-2909.118.1.3Search in Google Scholar

• Gottman, J.M., and Krokoff, L.J., (1989). “The relationship between marital interaction and marital.Search in Google Scholar

• Vaillant, C. & Vaillant, G. (1993). Is the U-Curve of marital satisfaction an illusion? A 40-year study of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 230-239.10.2307/352971Search in Google Scholar

• Markides, K. S., Roberts-Jolly, J., Ray, L.A., Hoppe & S. K., Rudkin, L. (1999). Changes in marital satisfaction in three generations of Mexican Americans. Research on Aging, 21, 36-46.10.1177/0164027599211002Search in Google Scholar

• Canary, D. J., Cupach, W. R. & Serpe, R. T. (2001). A Competence-based approach to examining interpersonal conflict - Test of a longitudinal model. Communication Research, 28 (1), 79-104.10.1177/009365001028001003Search in Google Scholar

• Stafford, L., Kline, S. L. & Rankin, C. T. (2004). Married individuals, cohabiters, and cohabiters who marry: A longitudinal study of relational and individual well-being. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21 (2), 231-248.10.1177/0265407504041385Search in Google Scholar

• Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann conflict MODE instrument.Tuxedo, New York: XICOM.Search in Google Scholar

• Canary, D. J., Cupach, W. R. & Messman, S. J. (1995). Relationship Conflict. Thousand Oaks, CA: SageSearch in Google Scholar

• Murray, S. L., & Holmes, J. G. (1995). When is a fault not a frailty? The structure of resilient representations in dating relationships. Unpublished data, University of WaterlooSearch in Google Scholar

• Čudina-Obradović, M. & Obradović, J. (2005). Psihologija braka i obitelji. Zagreb: Golden marketing - tehnička knjigaSearch in Google Scholar

• Obradović, J i Čudina-Obradović, M (1998). Bračna kvaliteta: poimanje, uzroci i poslijedice. Društvena istraživanja, 7, (4-5), 659-682.Search in Google Scholar

• Klaič, B. (1979) Rječnik stranih riječi. Zagreb, Nakladni zavod MH.Search in Google Scholar

• Brajsa, P. (1979) Neki aspekti obiteljske psihodinamike. Socijalna zaštita, br. 4/5, Zagreb, GZH.Search in Google Scholar

• Becvar, D. S., Becvar, R. J. (1996) Family Therapy. A Systemic Integration (3th ed.).Search in Google Scholar

• Olson, D. H (2000). Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems. Journal of Family Therapy. 22. pp.144-167.10.1111/1467-6427.00144Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo