1. bookVolume 11 (2015): Issue 1 (December 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1857-8462
First Published
01 Jul 2005
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Right To Property: From Magna Carta To The European Convention On Human Rights

Published Online: 13 Jan 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 11 (2015) - Issue 1 (December 2015)
Page range: 145 - 158
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1857-8462
First Published
01 Jul 2005
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Property rights are integral part of the freedom and prosperity of every person, although their centrality has often been misprized and their provenance was doubted. Yet, traces of their origin can be found in Magna Carta, signed by the King of England in 1215. It was a turning point in human rights. Namely, it enumerates what later came to be thought of as human rights. Among them was also the right of all free citizens to own and inherit property. The European Convention on Human Rights was heavily influenced by British legal traditions, including Magna Carta. Among other rights, it also guaranties the right to property as a human right. Moreover, the protection of property rights has been extended to intellectual property rights as well. Namely, the European Court of Human Rights has provided protection of intellectual property rights through the adoption of decisions that interpret the right to property, in relation to intellectual property protection claims. It has extended the human rights protection of property to the mere application for registration of the trade mark. This paper has placed its focus on the development and treatment of the right to property starting from Magna Carta to the European Convention on Human Rights, as modern version of Magna Carta. In this sense, the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and its role and approach in the protection of the right to property will be examined as well.

Bates, Ed, The Evolution of the European Convention on Human Rights: From Its Inception to the Creation of a Permanent Court of Human Rights, OUP Oxford, 201010.1093/acprof:oso/9780199207992.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Chapman, Audrey R., A Human Rights Perspective on Intellectual Property, Scientific Progress, and Access to the Benefits of Science, WIPO Publication No.762(I), Geneva, 1999Search in Google Scholar

Coban, Ali Riza, Protection of Property Rights within the European Convention of Human Rights, Ashgate Publishing, 2004Search in Google Scholar

Cullet, Philippe, Human Rights and Intellectual Property Protection in the TRIPS Era, The John Hopkins University Press, Human Rights Quarterly, Volume 29, No.2, 200710.1353/hrq.2007.0014Search in Google Scholar

Griffits, Johnatan and McDough, Luke, Constructing European Intellectual Property, Achievements and New Perspectives, Edvard Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham & Edvard Elgar Publishing Inc, Northampton, 2013Search in Google Scholar

Grgic, Aida, Mataga, Zvonimir, Longar, Matija and Vilfan, Ana, The Right to Property under the European Convention on Human Rights A Guide to the Implementation of the European Convention on Human Rights and Its Protocols, Council of Europe, 2007Search in Google Scholar

Helfer, Laurence R., The New Innovation Frontier? Intellectual Property and the European Court of Human Rights, Harvard International Law Journal, Volume 49, 2008Search in Google Scholar

O’Neill, Johnathan, Property Rights and the American Founding: An Overview, Supreme Court Historical Society, Volume 38, Issue 3, 201310.1111/j.1540-5818.2013.12021.xSearch in Google Scholar

Rathbone, Mark, The Human Rights Act: a Magna Carta for the Twenty-First Century?, Political Studies Association, 2014Search in Google Scholar

Renucci, Jean-François, Introduction to the European Convention on Human Rights The rights guaranteed and the protection mechanism, Council of Europe, 2005Search in Google Scholar

Santos, Ana Eduarda, Reballancing Intellectual Property in the Information Society: The Human Rights Approach, Duke Law School, 2013Search in Google Scholar

Schmidtz, David, The Institution of Property, Social Philosophy and Policy, No.11, 199410.1017/S0265052500004428Search in Google Scholar

Siegan, Bernard H., Property Rights: From Magna Carta to the Fourteenth Amendment, Transaction Publishers, 2001Search in Google Scholar

Спировски, Игор, Јуриспруденцијата на Европскиот суд за човекови права (збирка на пресуди), 2-ри Август С, Штип, 2007Search in Google Scholar

Welkowitz, David S., Privatizing Human Rights? Creating Intellectual Property Rights from Human Rights Principles, New York University, Volume 43, No.3, Article 3, 2013Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, Tim, Property Rights are Human Rights, IPA Review, Volume 67, No.I, Article 2, 2015Search in Google Scholar

Magna Carta, Runnymede, 15.6.1215Search in Google Scholar

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms as amended by Protocols No.11 and No.14, Rome, 4.11.1950Search in Google Scholar

Cases of the European Commission of Human Rights and the European Court of Human Rights:Search in Google Scholar

Akkus v. Turkey, July 9, 1997, Reports 1997-IVSearch in Google Scholar

Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 44 Eur. H.R. Rep. 42 [846], 855-56 (Chamber 2007) (judgement of Oct. 11, 2005)Search in Google Scholar

Anheuser-Busch Inc. v. Portugal, App.No.73049/01, 45 Eur. H.R. Rep. 36 [830], (Grand Chamber 2007)Search in Google Scholar

Aral v. Turkey, App.No.24563/94 (1998) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Dima v. Romania, App.No.58472/00, para 87 (2005) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Draon v. France, App.No.1513/13, 42 Eur.H.R. Rep.40 [807], 832-33 (2006) (judgement of Oct.6, 2005)Search in Google Scholar

Fedorenko v. Ukraine, App.No.25921/02, 29 (2006)Search in Google Scholar

Forrer-Niedenthal v. Germany, February 20, 2003, App.No. 46316/99Search in Google Scholar

Jahn v. Germany, App.No.46720/99, 42 Eur.H.R.Rep.49 [1085], 1105 (Grand Chamber 2006) (judgement of June 30, 2005)Search in Google Scholar

Lenzing AG v. United Kingdom, App.No.38817/97, 94-A Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep.136 (1998)Search in Google Scholar

Melnychuk v. Ukraine, App.No.28743, para.8 (2005) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Motais de Narbonne v. France, July 2, 2002, App.No. 48161/99Search in Google Scholar

Smith Kline & French Lab. Ltd v. Netherlands, App.No.12633/87, 66 Eur. Comm’ H.R. Dec.&Rep. 70, 79 (1990) (admissibility decision)Search in Google Scholar

Sporrong and Lonnroth v. Sweden, September 23, 1982, A 52, § 63Search in Google Scholar

Tre Traktorer AB v. Sweden, July 7, 1989, A 159, § 53Search in Google Scholar

Van Marle and Others v. the Netherlands, June 26, 1986, A 10110.1007/978-1-4612-4830-9_24Search in Google Scholar

Wiggins v. the United Kingdom, EC, February 8, 1978, DR 13/40Search in Google Scholar

Zhigalev v. Russia, App.No.54891/00, 131 (2006)Search in Google Scholar

Zubani v. Italy, August 7,1996, Reports 1996-IVSearch in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo