[
Aboh, Enoch Oladé. 2004. The morphosyntax of complement-head sequences. Clause structure and word order patterns in Kwa. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195159905.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Agbayani, Brian & Masao Ochi. 2014. The split lexical Insertion hypothesis. Paper presented at the 40th Annual Conference of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, UC Berkeley, February.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Algeo, John. 2006. British or American English? A handbook of word and grammar patterns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511607240]Search in Google Scholar
[Antonov, Anton & Guillaume Jacques. 2014. Transitive need does not imply transitive have: Response to Harves and Kayne 2012. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1). 147-158.
10.1162/LING_a_00151]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16(3). 373-415.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. A further note on the nominal in the progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 2(4). 584-586.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Borer, Hagit. 2013. Heads and segments. Paper presented at the Workshop “Toward a Theory of Syntactic Variation”, Bilbao, 5-7 June.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Bresnan, Joan W. 1972. Theory of complementation in English syntax, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Cattaneo, Anderea. 2009. It is all about clitics: The case of a Northern Italian dialect like Bellinzonese. New York, NY: New York University dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Charnavel, Isabelle. 2011. On French un même and antispecificity. In Ingo Reich, Eva Horch & Dennis Pauly. S (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn & Bedeutung 15. 133-147. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press .
]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), Step by step: Essays in minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. 89-155. Cambridge, M.A: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), Ken Hale. A Life in language. 1-52. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomsky, Noam. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130. 33-49.
10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. ‘Restructuring’ and functional structure. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3; Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 132-191. New York: Oxford University Press (reprinted in Cinque (2006)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, Guglielmo. 2006. Restructuring and functional heads. (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 4; Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax). New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives: A comparative study (Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 57). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262014168.003.0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Cinque, Guglielmo & Luigi Rizzi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis. 51-65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8. 81-120.
10.1111/j.1467-9612.2005.00076.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Collins, Chris. 2006. A note on derivational morphology. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Collins, Chris. 2008. Home sweet home. NYU Working Papers in Linguistics 1. 1-34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Coon, Jessica. 2010. Complementation in Chol (Mayan): A theory of split ergativity, Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Cuervo, Maria Cristina. 2003. Datives at large. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Den Dikken, Marcel. 1995. Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Den Dikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and linkers. The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/5873.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Downing, Bruce T. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure. In Joseph Harold Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language 4: Syntax. 375-418. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Duncan, Daniel. 2014. Formalizing the novel-ish Ish-construction in English. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Etxepare, Ricardo. 2010. From hearsay evidentiality to samesaying relations. Lingua 120. 604-627.
10.1016/j.lingua.2008.07.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Frampton, John. 2009. Distributed reduplication. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262013260.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghomeshi, Jila. 1996. Projection and inflection: A study of Persian phrase structure. Toronto: University of Toronto dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Ghomeshi, Jila. 2001. Control and thematic agreement. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 46. 9-40.
10.1017/S0008413100017928]Search in Google Scholar
[Haddican, Bill, Anders Holmberg, Hidekazu Tanaka & George Tsoulas. 2014. Interrogative slifting in English. Lingua 138. 86-106.
10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Hale, Kenneth L. 1973. Person marking in Walbiri. In Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle. 308-344. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds.) The View from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (Current Studies in Linguistics Series 24), 53-109. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Hale, Kenneth & Samuel Jay Keyser. 2002. Prolegomenon to a theory of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/5634.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Halle, Morris & Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of Inflection. In Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds.), The View from building 20. Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger (Current Studies in Linguistics Series 24), 111-176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Halpert, Claire & Michael Diercks. 2013. No need for “have” (for “need”): A reply to Harves and Kayne (2012). Ms., University of Minnesota and Pomona College.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Harris, James W. 1969. Spanish phonology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Harves, Stephanie & Richard S. Kayne. 2012. Having need and needing have. Linguistic Inquiry 43. 120-132.
10.1162/LING_a_00076]Search in Google Scholar
[Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 2008. Bare phrase structure and specifier-less syntax. Biolinguistics 2. 87-106.
10.5964/bioling.8623]Search in Google Scholar
[Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil A. 2010. Stacking, stranding, and pied piping: A proposal about word order. Syntax 13. 298-330.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Julien, Marit. 2002. Syntactic heads and word formation. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Katz, Jerold J. & Paul M. Postal. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S.1975. French syntax. The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1981a. On certain differences between French and English. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 349-371 (reprinted in Kayne (1984)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1981b. Two notes on the NIC. In Adriana Belletti, Luciana Brandi & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Theory of markedness in generative grammar. Proceedings of the 1979 GLOW Conference. 317-346. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore (reprinted in Kayne (1984)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.
10.1515/9783111682228]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1989. Null subjects and clitic climbing. In Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth Safir (eds.), The null subject parameter (Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory), 239-261. Dordrecht: Reidel (reprinted in Kayne (2000)).
10.1007/978-94-009-2540-3_8]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 647-686 (reprinted in Kayne (2000)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1997. The English complementizer of. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 1. 43-54.
10.1023/A:1026433902748]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 1999. Prepositional complementizers as attractors. Probus 11. 39-73.
10.1515/prbs.1999.11.1.39]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2003. Silent years, silent hours. In Lars-Olof Delsing, Gunlög Josefsson, Halldor Armann Sigurðsson & Cecilia Falk (eds.), Grammar in focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack. 18 November 2003. 2. 209-226. Lund: Wallin and Dalholm (reprinted in Kayne (2005b)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2004. Prepositions as probes. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3; Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 192-212. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2005a. On the Syntax of Quantity in English. In Kayne (2005b).
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2005b. Movement and silence. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2007a. Some English (and Romance) auxiliaries. (Handout of) paper presented at XVII Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Universitat de Girona, 13-15 June.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2007b. A short note on where vs. place. In Roberta Maschi, Nicoletta Penello & Piera Rizzolatti (eds.), Miscellanea di Studi Linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani. 245-257. Udine: Forum (reprinted in Kayne (2010c)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2008a. Antisymmetry and the lexicon. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8. 1-31 (also in A.M. di Sciullo and C. Boeckx (eds.) The biolinguistic enterprise: New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty. 329-353. London: Oxford University Press (2011)) (reprinted in Kayne (2010c)).
10.1075/livy.8.01kay]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2008b. Expletives, datives, and the tension between morphology and syntax. In Theresa Biberauer (ed.), The limits of syntactic variation. 175-217. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (reprinted in Kayne (2010c)).
10.1075/la.132.07kay]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2010a. Why isn’t this a complementizer? In Kayne (2010c).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2010b. Toward a syntactic reinterpretation of Harris and Halle (2005). In Reineke Bok-Bennema, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Bart Hollebrandse (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2008, selected papers from “Going Romance” Groningen 2008. 145-170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2010c. Comparisons and contrasts. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2011. Why are there no directionality parameters? In M. Byram Washburn, K. McKinney- Bock, E. Varis, Ann Sawyer and Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.) Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 1-23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project (also in 2013 Studies in Chinese Linguistics 34, 3-37).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2014. Once and Twice. In Carla Contemori & Lena Dal Pozzo (eds.), Inquiries into linguistic theory and language acquisition. Papers offered to Adriana Belletti. 114-129. Siena: CISCL Press (also in Studies in Chinese Linguistics 36(1), 1-20).
10.1515/scl-2015-0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2015a. English one and ones as complex determiners. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. 2015b. Antisymmetry and morphology. Prefixes and suffixes. Paper presented at Roots IV, New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. & Jean-Yves Pollock. 2012. Toward an analysis of French hyper-complex inversion. In Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds.), Functional heads (Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7; Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 150-167. New York: Oxford University Press (also in Kayne (2010)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[Kayne, Richard S. & Jean-Yves Pollock. 2014. Locality and agreement in French hyper-complex inversion. In Enoch Oladé Aboh, Maria Teresa Guasti & Ian Gareth Roberts(eds.), Locality. 32-57. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945269.003.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description. Volume II. Complex constructions.141-170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Koopman, Hilda & Dominique Sportiche. 1989. Pronouns, logical variables and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 555-588.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Koopman, Hilda & Anna Szabolcsi. 2000. Verbal complexes. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/7090.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Laka, Itziar. 2006. Deriving split ergativity in the progressive: The case of Basque. In Alans Johns, Diane Massam & Juvenal Ndayiragije (eds.), Ergativity: Emerging issues. 173–196. Dordrecht: Springer.
10.1007/1-4020-4188-8_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Lakoff, George & Stanley Peters. 1969. Phrasal conjunction and symmetric predicates. In David A. Reibel & Sanford A. Schane (eds.), Modern Studies in English. 113-142. New Jersey, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Larson, Richard K. 1985. Bare-NP adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16. 595-621.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Law, Ann. 2002. Cantonese sentence-final particles and the CP domain. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 375-398.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Łazorczyk, Agnieszka Agata. 2010. Decomposing Slavic aspect: The role of aspectual morphology in Polish and other Slavic languages. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Leu, Thomas. 2007. These here demonstratives. In Tatjana Scheffler, Joshua Tauberer, Aviad Eilam & Laia Mayol (eds.), Proceedings of the 30th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium, Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 13(1). 141-154.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Leu, Thomas. 2008. What for internally. Syntax 11. 1-25.
10.1111/j.1467-9612.2008.00113.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Leu, Thomas. 2014. The architecture of determiners. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945238.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Levinson, Lisa. 2011. Possessive with in Germanic: have and the role of P. Syntax 14. 355–393.
10.1111/j.1467-9612.2011.00159.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Liao, Wei-Wen Roger. 2015. Once upon an invisible time: On frequentative phrases in Chinese. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 36(1). 21-33.
10.1515/scl-2015-0002]Search in Google Scholar
[Lin, Shih-Yueh Jeff. 2014. Questions, SFPs, and silence. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Lindner, Susan J. 1981. A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with out and up. San Diego: University of California, San Diego dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1994. Reference and proper names: A theory of N-movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25. 609-665.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1996. The syntax of N-raising: A minimalist theory. OTS Working Papers. Utrecht: Research Institute for Language and Speech, University of Utrecht.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Maddieson, Ian. 1989. Prenasalized stops and speech timing. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 19. 57-66.
10.1017/S0025100300003856]Search in Google Scholar
[Marantz, Alec. 1982. Re reduplication. Linguistic Inquiry 13. 435-482.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4. 201-225.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Marušič, Franc & Rok Žaucer. 2006. The “definite article” TA in colloquial Slovenian. In James Lavine, Steven Franks, Milla Tasseva-Kurktchieva & Hana Filip (eds.) 189-204. Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 1994. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar. Abingdon: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Morin, Annick. 2009. On the Quebec French interrogative particle “tu”. In Enoch O. Aboh, Elisabeth van der Linden, Josep Quer & Petra Sleeman (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory: Selected papers from “Going Romance” Amsterdam 2007. 201-222. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/rllt.1.11mor]Search in Google Scholar
[Nilsen, Øystein. 2003. Eliminating positions: The syntax and semantics of sentence modification. Utrecht: University of Utrecht dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Nurse, Derek. & Henry Muzale. 1999. Tense and aspect in Great Lakes Bantu languages. In Jean-Marie Hombert & Larry M. Hyman (eds.), Bantu Historical Linguistics. Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. 517-544. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Ouhalla, Jamal. 2005. Clitic placement, grammaticalization, and reanalysis in Berber. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax. 607-638. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Paddock, Harold. 1990. On explaining macrovariation in the Sibiliant and nasal suffixes of English. Folia Linguistica Historica 22, Issue Historica 9(1). 235-269.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Partee, Barbara Hall. 1973. Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English. The Journal of Philosophy 70(18). 601-609.
10.2307/2025024]Search in Google Scholar
[Pereltsvaig, Asya. 2007. The universality of DP: A view from Russian. Studia Linguistica 61. 59-94.
10.1111/j.1467-9582.2007.00129.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Pesetsky, David. 1993. Topic... comment. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 11. 557-558.
10.1007/BF00993169]Search in Google Scholar
[Pesetsky, David. 2014. Russian case morphology and the syntactic categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262019729.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The higher functional field: Evidence from Northern Italian dialects. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365-424.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1998. On the syntax of subnominal clitics: Cliticization and ellipsis. Syntax 1. 300-330.
10.1111/1467-9612.00011]Search in Google Scholar
[Rigau, Gemma. 1984. De com si no és conjunció i d’altres elements interrogatius. Estudis gramaticals: Working papers in linguistics 1. 249-278. Bellaterra: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Rimell, Laura. 2005. Tense and aspect projections in Niger-Congo languages. Ms., New York University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar. Handbook of generative syntax. 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenbaum, Peter S. 1967. The grammar of English predicate complement constructions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Ross, John R. 1970. On declarative sentences. In Roderick A. Jacobs & Peter S. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English transformational grammar. 222-272. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Round, Erich. 2014. Prestopping of nasals and laterals is only partly parallel. In Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin & Diana Guillemin (eds.), Language description informed by theory. 81-95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/slcs.147.05rou]Search in Google Scholar
[Sauerland, Uli. 2009. Decomposing question acts. Snippets 20. 62-63.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Sauerland, Uli & Kazuko Yatsushiro. 2014. Remind-me presuppositions and speech-act decomposition: Japanese “kke” and German “wieder” . Ms., ZAS, Berlin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Săvescu-Ciucivara, Oana. 2009. A syntactic analysis of pronominal clitic clusters in Romance. The view from Romanian. New York: New York University dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Shlonsky, Ur. 1989. The hierarchical representation of subject verb agreement. Ms., University of Haifa.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Simpson, Andrew & Zoe Wu. 2002a. IP-raising, tone sandhi and the creation of S-final particles: Evidence for cyclic spell-out. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 11. 67-99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Simpson, Andrew & Zoe Wu. 2002b. Understanding cyclic spell-out. In Mako Hirotani (ed.), Proceedings of North Eastern Linguistic Society (NELS) 32. 499-518. Amherst: GLSA Publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Sportiche, Dominique. 1995. Clitic Constructions. In Laurie Zaring & Johan Rooryck (eds.), Phrase structure and the lexicon. 213-276. Kluwer: Dordrecht.
10.1007/978-94-015-8617-7_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Starke, Michal. 2004. On the inexistence of specifiers and the nature of heads. In Adriana Belletti (ed.), Structures and beyond (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3; Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 252-268. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Starke, Michal. 2009. Nanosyntax. A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36(1). 1-6.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. A generalized syntactic schema for utterance particles in Chinese. Lingua Sinica 1. 1-23.
10.1186/s40655-015-0005-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Terzi, Arhonto. 2010. Locative prepositions and place. In Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds.), Mapping spatial PPs (The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 6; Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax), 196-224. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195393675.003.0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Travis, Lisa DeMena. 2003. Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In Sophie Burelle & Stanca Somesfalean (ed.), Proceedings of Canadian Linguistics Association (CLA). 236-247. Montréal, QC: Université du Québec à Montréal.
]Search in Google Scholar
[Turpin, Myfany, Katherine Demuth & April Ngampart Campbell. 2014. Phonological aspects of Arandic baby talk. In Rob Pensalfini, Myfany Turpin & Diana Guillemin (eds.), Language description informed by theory. 49-80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10.1075/slcs.147.04tur]Search in Google Scholar
[Vinet, Marie Thérèse. 2000. Feature representation and -tu (pas) in Quebec French. Studia Linguistica 54(3). 381-411.
10.1111/1467-9582.00071]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, Edwin. 1981. On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry 12. 245-274.
]Search in Google Scholar
