This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Guray M, Sahin AA. Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management. Oncologist 2006; 11: 435-49. 10.1634/theoncologist.11-5-435GurayMSahinAA.Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and managementOncologist20114354910.1634/theoncolo-gist.11-5-435Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dupont WD, Page DL. Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast disease. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 146-51. 10.1056/NEJM198501173120303DupontWDPageDL.Risk factors for breast cancer in women with proliferative breast diseaseN Engl J Med19853121465110.1056/NEJM198501173120303Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dupont WD, Parl FF, Hartmann WH, Brinton LA, Winfield AC, Worrell JA, etal. Breast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasia. Cancer 1993; 71: 1258-65.DupontWDParlFFHartmannWHBrintonLAWinfieldACWorrellJAet alBreast cancer risk associated with proliferative breast disease and atypical hyperplasiaCancer19937112586510.1002/1097-0142(19930215)71:4<1258::AID-CNCR2820710415>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar
Ellis IO. Intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast: morphology, associated risk and molecular biology. Modern Pathology 2010; 23(Suppl 2): S1-7.10.1038/modpathol.2010.56EllisIO.Intraductal proliferative lesions of the breast: morphology, associated risk and molecular biologyModern Pathology201023(Suppl 2)S1710.1038/modpathol.2010.56Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
ƠFlynn EAM. Diagnosis of primary breast cancer. In: Luna A, Vilanova JC, Celso Hygino Da Cruz Jr. LC, Rossi SE, editors. Functional imaging in oncology: clinical applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2014. p. 816-37.ƠFlynnEAMDiagnosis of primary breast cancer. InLunaAVilanovaJCCelso Hygino Da Cruz JrLCRossiSEeditorsFunctional imaging in oncology: clinical applicationsBerlin HeidelbergSpringer-Verlag201492p. 81637Search in Google Scholar
D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. ACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system. Reston, VA: American College ofRadiology; 2013.D'OrsiCJSicklesEAMendelsonEBMorrisEAACR BI-RADS atlas, breast imaging reporting and data systemReston, VAAmerican College ofRadiology2013Search in Google Scholar
Millet I, Pages E, Hoa D, Merigeaud S, Curros Doyon F, Prat X, et al. Pearls and pitfalls in breast MRI. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 197-207. 10.1259/bjr/47213729MilletIPagesEHoaDMerigeaudSCurros DoyonFPratXet alPearlsand pitfalls in breast MRIBr J Radiol20128519720710.1259/bjr/47213729Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thomassin-Naggara I, Salem C, Darai E, Bazot M, Uzan S, Marsault C, et al. Non-mass like enhancement on breast MRI: interpretation pearls. JRadiol2009; 90: 269-75. doi: JR-04-2009-90-4-0221-0363-101019-200904045Thomassin-NaggaraISalemCDaraiEBazotM.UzanSMarsaultCet alNon-masslike enhancement on breast MRI: interpretation pearlsJ Radiol20099026975JR-04-2009-90-4-0221-0363-101019-200904045Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Setoguchi, Okafuji T, Soeda H, et al. Non-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. Eur J Radiol 2010; 75: 126-32. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.013YabuuchiHMatsuoYKamitaniTSetoguchiOkafujiTWoedaHet alNon-mass-like enhancement on contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging: lesion characterization using combination of dynamic contrast-enhancedand diffusion-weighted MR imagesEur J Radiol20107512632doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.09.013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nadrljanski M, Markovic BB, Milosevic ZC. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS): morphologic and kinetic MRI findings. Iran J Radiol 2013; 10: 99-102.10.5812/iranjradiol.4876NadrljanskiMMarkovicBB MilosevicZCBreast ductal carcinoma in situ(DCIS): morphologic and kinetic MRI findingsIran J Radiol2013109910210.5812/iranjradiolOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nadrljanski M, Miloš evic ZČ, Plešinac-Karapandžić V, Goldner B. Značaj magnetne rezonancije dojki u dijagnostici duktalnog karcinoma in situ. Srp ArhCelok Lek 2013; 141: 402-8. 10.2298/SARH1306402NNadrljanskiMMiloš evicZČPlešinac-KarapandžićVGoldnerBZnačaj mag-netne rezonancije dojki u dijagnostici duktalnog karcinomain situ. Srp ArhCelok Lek2013141402810.2298/SARH1306402NOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology. Guideline for breast ultrasound: management and diagnosis. Tokyo: Nankodo Co.; 2004. p. 35-7.Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid SonologyGuideline for breastultrasound: management and diagnosisTokyo: Nankodo Co2004261p. 357Search in Google Scholar
Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, Decker T, Federico M, Gilbert FJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from theEUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer 2010; 46: 1296-316. 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015SardanelliFBoetesCBorischBDeckerTFedericoMGilbertfjet alMagnetic resonance imaging of the breast: Recommendations from theEUSOMA working groupEur J Cancer201046129631610.1016/j.ejca.2010.02.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nadrljanski MM, Miloševic ZC, Pleš inac-Karapandžic V, Maksimovic R. MRIin the evaluation of breast cancer patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive factors for breast conservative surgery. Diagn Interv Radiol 2013; 19: 463-70. 10.5152/dir.2013.13201NadrljanskiMMMiloševicZCPleš inac-KarapandžicVMaksimovicRMRIin the evaluation of breast cancer patient response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive factors for breast conservative surgeryDiagn Interv Radiol2013194637010.5152/dir.2013.1320124047722Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Povoski SP, Neff RL, Mojzisik CM, O’Malley DM, Hinkle GH, Hall NC, et al. A comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detectionprobe technology. World J Surg Oncol 2009; 7: 7-11. 10.1186/1477-7819-7-11PovoskiSPNeffRLMojzisikCMO’Malley DMHinkleGHHallNCet alA comprehensive overview of radioguided surgery using gamma detectionprobe technologyWorld J Surg Oncol2009771110.1186/1477-7819-7-11265307219173715Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Santen RJ, Mansel R. Benign Breast Disorders. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 275-85. 10.1056/NEJMra035692SantenRJManselR.Benign Breast DisordersN Engl J Med20053532758510.1056/NEJMra03569216034013Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goehring C, Morabia A. Epidemiology of benign breast disease, with specialattention to histologic types. Epidemiol Rev 1997; 19: 310-27.GoehringCMorabiaA.Epidemiology of benign breast disease, with special attention to histologic typesEpidemiol Rev1997193102710.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a0179609494790Search in Google Scholar
Wu C, Ray RM, Lin MG, Gao DL, Horner NK, Nelson ZC, et al. A case-control study of risk factors for fibrocystic breast conditions. Am J Epidemiol 2004;160: 945-60. 10.1093/aje/kwh318WuCRayRMLinMGGaoDLHornerNKNelsonZCet alA case-controlstudy of risk factors for fibrocystic breast conditionsAm J Epidemiol20041609456010.1093/aje/kwh31815522851Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen JH, Liu H, Baek HM, Nalcioglu O, Su MY. MR imaging features of fibrocystic change of the breast. Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 26: 1207-14. doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.02.004ChenJHLiuHBaekHMNalciogluOSuMY MR imaging features of fibro-cystic change of the breastMagn Reson Imaging200826120714doi:10.1016/j.mri.2008.02.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Chen JH, Nalcioglu O, Su MY. Fibrocystic change of the breast presenting as afocal lesion mimicking breast cancer in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 1499-505. 10.1002/jmri.21455ChenJHNalciogluOSuMYFibrocystic change of the breast presenting as afocal lesion mimicking breast cancer in MR imagingJ Magn Reson Imaging200828149950510.1002/jmri.21455259734419025938Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van den Bosch MA, Daniel BL, Mariano MN, Nowels KN, Birdwell RL, FongKJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of fibrocystic change of the breast. Invest Radiol 2005; 40: 436-41.van den BoschMADanielBLMarianoMNNowelsKNBirdwellRLFongKJet alMagnetic resonance imaging characteristics of fibrocystic change of the breastInvest Radiol2005404364110.1097/01.rli.0000167123.26334.c815973135Search in Google Scholar
Kiyak G, Asik E, Yazgan A. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of fibrocystic change of the breast. Bratisl Lek Listy 2011; 112: 506-9KiyakGAsikEYazganA.Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of fibrocystic change of the breastBratisl Lek Listy20111125069Search in Google Scholar
Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, Abe H, Schmidt RA, Giger M, et al.DCE MRI of breast lesions: Is kinetic analysis equally effective for both:mass and non mass-like enhancement? Med Phys 2008; 35: 3102-9. doi:10.1118/1.2936220JansenSAFanXKarczmarGSAbeHSchmidtRAGigerMet alDCE MRI of breast lesions: Is kinetic analysis equally effective for both:mass and nonmass-like enhancementMed Phys.20083531029doi:10.1118/1.2936220Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Agrawal G, Su MY, Nalcioglu O, Feig SA, Chen JH. Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BIRADS MRI lexicon. Cancer 2009; 115: 1363-80. doi:10.1002/cncr.24156AgrawalGSuMYNalciogluOFeigSAChenJH.Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BIRADS MRI lexiconCancer2009115136380doi:10.1002/cncr.24156Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tozaki M, Fukuda K. High-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 330-7. 10.2214/ajr.187.3.w330TozakiMFukudaKHigh-spatial-resolution MRI of non-masslike breast lesions: interpretation model based on BI-RADS MRI descriptorsAJR Am J Roentgenol2006187330710.2214/ajr.187.3.w330Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rahbar H, Partridge SC. Multiparametric MR imaging of breast cancer. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2016; 24: 223-38. 10.1016/j.mric.2015.08.012RahbarHPartridgeSCMultiparametric MR imaging of breast cancerMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am2016242233810.1016/j.mric.2015.08.012467239026613883Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bartella L, Liberman L, Morris EA, Dershaw DD. Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 865-70. 10.2214/AJR.04.1777BartellaLLibermanLMorrisEADershawDDNonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRIAJR Am J Roentgenol20061868657010.2214/AJR.04.177716498122Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, Kubota T, Kizu O, Yamada K, et al. Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dyamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 104-12. 10.1002/jmri.20812GotoMItoHAkazawaKKubotaTKizuOYamadaKet alDiagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dyamic enhancement patterns and morphologic featuresJ Magn Reson Imaging2007251041210.1002/jmri.2081217152054Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Newell D, Nie K, Chen JH, Hsu CC, Yu HJ, Nalcioglu O, et al. Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. Eur Radiol 2010; 20:771-81. 10.1007/s00330-009-1616-yNewellDNieKChenJHHsuCCYuHJNalcioglu O, et al. Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancementEur Radiol2010207718110.1007/s00330-009-1616-y283563619789878Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kaiser WA. Signs in MR-Mammography. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008.KaiserWASigns in MR-Mammography.Berlin HeidelbergSpringer-Verlag200810.1007/978-3-540-73293-8Search in Google Scholar
Hartmann LC, Degnim AC, Santen RJ, Dupont WD, Ghosh K. Atypical hyperplasia of the breast - risk assessment and management options. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 78-9. 10.1056/NEJMsr1407164HartmannLCDegnimACSantenRJDupontWDGhoshKAtypical hyperplasia of the breast - risk assessment and management optionsN Engl J Med201537278910.1056/NEJMsr1407164434790025551530Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer JClin 2007; 57: 75-89.SaslowDBoetesCBurkeWHarmsSLeachMOLehmanCDet alAmerican Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammographyCA Cancer JClin200757758910.3322/canjclin.57.2.7517392385Search in Google Scholar
Ochi M, Kuroiwa T, Sunami S, Murakami J, Murakami J, Miyahara S, Nagaie T, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm (2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changes. Breast Cancer 2013; 20: 137-44. 10.1007/s12282-011-0319-9OchiMKuroiwaTSunamiSMurakamiJMurakamiJMiyaharaSNagaieTet alDiffusion-weighted imaging (b value = 1500 s/mm (2)) is useful to decrease false-positive breast cancer cases due to fibrocystic changesBreast Cancer2013201374422161277Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Nadrljanski MM, Gusic N, Milovanovic Z, Plesinac-Karapandzic V, Radulovic O, Milosevic ZC. Fibrocystic changes of the breast: lesion characterization using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR images. ECR 2013, EPOS. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/ecr2013/C-0868.NadrljanskiMMGusicNMilovanovicZPlesinac-KarapandzicVRadulovicOMilosevicZCFibrocystic changes of the breast: lesion characterization using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imagesECR2013EPOS. Available at:http://dx.doi.org/10.1594/ecr2013/C-0868.Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
