Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
Volume 8 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)
Open Access
Sixty years of project planning: history and future
M. Hajdu
M. Hajdu
and
S. Isaac
S. Isaac
| Mar 14, 2017
Organization, Technology and Management in Construction: an International Journal
Volume 8 (2016): Issue 1 (December 2016)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Article Category:
Research Article
Published Online:
Mar 14, 2017
Page range:
1499 - 1510
Received:
Oct 16, 2016
Accepted:
Nov 28, 2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/otmcj-2016-0013
Keywords
network scheduling
,
Critical Path Method
,
PERT
,
Precedence Diagramming Method
,
continuous precedence relations
,
non-linear activities
,
logical switches
© 2016 M. Hajdu et al., published by De Gruyter Open
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Fig. 1
Mercury delay line memory of UNIVAC I (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNIVAC_I).
Fig. 2
Result of the first CPM analysis made by a computer (Kelley 1989).
Fig. 3
Topology graph of the CPM network (Kelley 1989).
Fig. 4
Typical density function of the PERT-beta distribution.
Fig. 5
Distribution of the project duration of one-chain and 10-chain networks.
Fig. 6
The effect of the different activity calendars on the distribution of project duration based on the same one-chain network (Hajdu 2013).
Fig. 7
Assumption of time vs cost of the original CPM model.
Fig. 8
The set of feasible solutions of the CPM model.
Fig. 9
Maximal relations in PDM network.
Fig. 10
Assumption of linear activities is essential in case of traditional relationships.
Fig. 11
The positive effect of pre-emption on the project duration.
Fig. 12
Application of logical switches on relationships.
Fig. 13
Point-to-point relations for better modelling of overlapping activities.
Fig. 14
Continuous relations with time and work gaps.
Fig. 15
Bi-directional precedence relations.
Fig. 16
Possible optimal solutions of Fig. 15.