Cite

Figure 1

Changes in the Q index for water bodies No. 1–4 between 2013 and 2015
Changes in the Q index for water bodies No. 1–4 between 2013 and 2015

Figure 2

Changes in the Q index for water bodies No. 1 and 2 between 2013 and 2015
Changes in the Q index for water bodies No. 1 and 2 between 2013 and 2015

Figure 3

Changes in the Q index for water bodies No. 3 and 4 between 2013 and 2015
Changes in the Q index for water bodies No. 3 and 4 between 2013 and 2015

Figure 4

Land use types in 500 m buffer zones around the water bodies
Land use types in 500 m buffer zones around the water bodies

Figure 5

Land use types in 1000 m buffer zones around the water bodies
Land use types in 1000 m buffer zones around the water bodies

The number of taxa of vascular plants in water bodies No. 1–4 between 2013 and 2015

Water body Plants 2013 2014 2015
No. 1 trees and shrubs 8 8 8
herbaceous plants 6 6 9
macrophytes 1 1 1
No. 2 trees and shrubs 3 3 3
herbaceous plants 5 9 18
macrophytes 3 5 2
No. 3 trees and shrubs 1 1 1
herbaceous plants 6 10 22
macrophytes 2 2 2
No. 4 trees and shrubs 4 4 3
herbaceous plants 11 16 14
macrophytes 7 8 7

The shortest distance from facilities that may be potential sources of pollution

No. of water body Distance from the nearest livestock farm (m) Distance from the nearest mine (m) Distance from the nearest sewage treatment plant (m) Distance from the nearest landfill (m) Distance from the nearest production plant (m) Distance from the nearest road (m)
1 20.3 6836 6720 6698 418 32
2 418 7000 6200 6174 931 33
3 4281.5 7040 2497 2538 897 26
4 3779 4596.5 4292 4688 2416 243

Classification of the ecological status of water based on the Q index

Ecological status Q index value
Very good 4.0–5.0
Good 3.0–4.0
Medium 2.0–3.0
Poor 1.0–2.0
Bad 0–1.0
eISSN:
1897-3191
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Chemistry, other, Geosciences, Life Sciences