Validation of the method for determination of plutonium isotopes in urine samples and its application in a nuclear facility at Otwock

1. Qiao, J., Xu, Y., Hou, X., & Miro, M. (2014). Comparison of sample preparation methods for reliable plutonium and neptunium urinalysis using automatic extraction chromatography. Talanta, 128, 75–82.10.1016/j.talanta.2014.04.007Search in Google Scholar

2. Voelz, G. L. (2000). Plutonium and health – how great is the risk? Los Alamos Science, 26, 74–89.Search in Google Scholar

3. ICRP. (1997). Individual monitoring for internal exposure of workers. ICRP Publication 78. Ann. ICRP, 27(3/4).Search in Google Scholar

4. Vajda, N., & Kim, C.-K. (2009). Determination of Pu isotopes by alpha spectrometry: a review of analytical methodology. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 283, 203–223.10.1007/s10967-009-0342-xSearch in Google Scholar

5. Lecoix, G., & Chevalier, C. (2013). Actinides in urine. PROCORAD Radiotoxicological Intercomparison Exercises, 19–21 June 2013, Bucharest, Romania, Retrieved September 11, 2014 from https://procorad.mysps.net/SiteAssets/SitePages/en/News/Lecoix_actinides_urines.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

6. Alvarez, A., & Navarro, N. (1996). Method for actinides and Sr-90 determination in urine samples. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 47, 869–873.10.1016/S0969-8043(96)00077-2Search in Google Scholar

7. Arginelli, D., Berton, G., Bortoluzzi, S., Canuto, G., Groppi, F., Montalto, M., Nocente, M., Ridone, S., & Vergo, M. (2008). Purification and separation of Pu and Am in biological samples by anion-exchange and extraction chromatography for high resolution alpha-spectrometry analyses. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 277, 65–71.10.1007/s10967-008-0710-ySearch in Google Scholar

8. Robredo, L. M., Navarro, T., & Sierra, I. (2000). Indirect monitoring of internal exposure in decomissioning of a nuclear power plant in Spain. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 53, 345–350.10.1016/S0969-8043(00)00151-2Search in Google Scholar

9. Hallstadius, L. (1984). A method for the electrodeposition of actinides. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., 223, 266–267.10.1016/0167-5087(84)90659-8Search in Google Scholar

10. EURACHEM-Guide. (1998). The fitness for purpose of analytical methods – a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics.Search in Google Scholar

11. Shakhashiro, A., Fajgelj, A., & Sansone, U. (2007). Comparison of different approaches to evaluate proficiency test data. In: A. Fajgelj, A. Belli & U. Sansone (Eds.), Combining and reporting analytical results (pp. 220–228). Cambridge: RSC Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

12. Kumar, R., Yadav, J. R., Rao, D. D., & Chand, L. (2010). Determination of plutonium isotopes in urine samples from radiation workers using ²³⁶Pu tracer, anion exchange resin and alpha spectrometry. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 283, 785–788.10.1007/s10967-009-0419-6Search in Google Scholar

13. American National Standards Institute. (1996). Performance criteria for radiobioassay. ANSI N 13.30. New York.Search in Google Scholar