[Alach, Z. 2017. “Towards a Standard Conceptual Typology of Public Sector Performance Measurement.” Kotuitui 12(1), 56 - 69.]Search in Google Scholar
[Arndt, C., S. Hermanutz, C. Kauffmann and R. Schultz. 2016. “Building Regulatory Policy Systems in OECD Countries.” OECD Regulatory Policy Working Paper 5. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/dbb1a18f-en10.1787/dbb1a18f-en]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Barbato, G. and M. Turri. 2017. “Understanding Public Performance Measurement through Theoretical Pluralism.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 30(1), 15 - 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blanc, F. 2009. Measuring Business Inspections: A Quick Guide to Surveys and Other Methodologies. IFC. Available at http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2011/02/23/000356161_20110223035404/Rendered/PDF/597910WP02009111public10BOX358294B0.pdf (last accessed October 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Blanc, F. 2012. Inspection Reforms: Why, How, and with What Results. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at http://www.oecd.org/regreform/Inspection%20reforms%20-%20web%20-F.%20Blanc.pdf (last accessed October 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouckaert, G. and J. Halligan. 2008. Managing Performance: International Comparisons. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203935958]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyne, G., P. Day and R. Walker. 2002. “Th e Evaluation of Public Service Inspection: A Theoretical Framework.” Urban Studies 39(7), 1197 - 1212.10.1080/00420980220135563]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Charlebois, S. and S. Hielm. 2014. “Empowering the Regulators in the Development of National Performance Measurements in Food Safety.” British Food Journal 116(2), 317 - 336.]Search in Google Scholar
[Choong, K. K. 2013. “Understanding the Features of Performance Measurement System: A Literature Review.” Measuring Business Excellence 17(4), 102 - 121.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, T. and P. Lægreid. 2015. “Performance and Accountability: A Theoretical Discussion and an Empirical Assessment.” Public Organization Review 15(2), 207 - 225.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christie, C. A. and M. C. Alkin. 2008. “Evaluation Theory Tree Re-Examined.” Studies in Educational Evaluation 34(3), 131 - 135. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Coglianese, C. 2012. Measuring Regulatory Performance: Evaluating the Impact of Regulation and Regulatory Policy. Paris: OECD Publishing. Available at https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/1_coglianese%20web.pdf (last accessed October 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cordes, J. J. 2017. “Using Cost-Benefit Analysis and Social Return on Investment to Evaluate the Impact of Social Enterprise: Promises, Implementation, and Limitations.” Evaluation and Program Planning 64, 98 - 104.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dan, S. and C. Pollitt. 2015. “NPM can Work: An Optimistic Review of the Impact of New Public Management Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe.” Public Management Review 17(9), 1305 - 1332.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobrolyubova, E. I. 2016. “International Experience in Evaluating Effectiveness of Public Control in Occupational Safety.” Public Administration Issues (2), 96 - 110.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dobrolyubova, E. I., N. V. Zybunovskaya, A. N. Pokida and V. N. Yuzhakov. 2017. “Evaluating Impact of Enforcement and Inspections on Business Activity.” Public Administration Issues 2, 7 - 25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Doroshenko, S. V. 2012. “Assessment of Environment Protection Activity Impact in Russian Regions.” Economy of Region 2, 116 - 128.]Search in Google Scholar
[FSIS. 2016. Th e Food Safety and Inspection Service Strategic Plan for 2017 - 2021. Available at https://www.fsis.usda.gov/wps/portal/informational/aboutfsis/strategic-planning/fy-2017-2021-strategic-plan (last accessed October 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Gao, J. 2015. “Performance Measurement and Management in the Public Sector: Some Lessons from Research Evidence.” Public Administration and Development 35(2), 86 - 96.]Search in Google Scholar
[Greiling, D. 2006. “Performance Measurement: A Remedy for Increasing the Efficiency of Public Services ?” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 55(6), 448 - 465.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grossi, G., M. B. Hansen, J. Johanson, J. Vakkuri and M. J. Moon. 2016. “Introduction: Comparative Performance Management and Accountability in the Age of Austerity.” Public Performance and Management Review 39(3), 499 - 505.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hammerschmid, G. and L. Löffl er. 2015. “Th e Implementation of Performance Management in European Central Governments: More a North-South than an East-West Divide.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 8(2), 49 - 68.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hampton, P. 2005. Reducing Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/bud-05hampton_150305_640.pdf (last accessed May 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[HSE. 2016. Annual Report and Accounts 2015 - 16. Available at http://www.hse.gov.uk/aboutus/reports/ara-2015-16.pdf (last accessed May 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton. 1992. “Th e Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review 70(1), 71 - 79.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kravchuk, R. S. and R. W. Schack. 1996. “Designing Effective Performance-Measurement Systems under the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993.” Public Administration Review 56(4), 348 - 358.10.2307/976376]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Lewis, J. M. 2015. “Th e Politics and Consequences of Performance Measurement.” Policy and Society 34(1), 1 - 12.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ma, S., G. Chen and B.-K. Tan. 2015. “Aspects of the Health Inspection Authority in the People’s Republic of China Health Policies, Systems and Management.” BMC Public Health 15(1), Art. No. 499.]Search in Google Scholar
[Magd, H. and A. Curry. 2003. “Benchmarking: Achieving Best Value in Public-Sector Organisations.” Benchmarking 10(3), 261 - 286.]Search in Google Scholar
[Monk, J. 2012. Reform of Regulatory Enforcement and Inspections in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Moore, M. H. 2000. “Managing for Value: Organizational Strategy in For-Profi t, Nonprofi t, and Governmental Organizations.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 29 (SUPPL.), 183 - 204.10.1177/0899764000291S009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Moynihan, D. P., S. K. Pandey and B. E. Wright. 2012. “Prosocial Values and Performance Management Th eory: Linking Perceived Social Impact and Performance Information Use.” Governance 25(3), 463 - 483.10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01583.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Northcott, D. and T. Ma’amora Taulapapa. 2012. “Using the Balanced Scorecard to Manage Performance in Public Sector Organizations: Issues and Challenges.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 25(3), 166 - 191.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2013. Governing Eff ective Prevention and Mitigation of Disruptive Shocks. Risk Management Police Issues Paper. Paris: OECD Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2014. Regulatory Enforcement and Inspections. Paris: OECD Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plaksin, S. M., S. V. Semenov and E. V. Klimovskaya. 2015. Onsnovnye tendentsii I itogi kontrol’no-nadzornoj dejatelnosti v Rossiiskoj Federacii v 2011 - 2014 gg [Main trends and results of control and oversight activities in the Russian Federation in 2011 - 2014]. Moscow: HSE.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reichborn-Kjennerud, K. and S. I. Vabo. 2017. “Performance Audit as a Contributor to Change and Improvement in Public Administration.” Evaluation 23(1), 6 - 23.]Search in Google Scholar
[Safe Work Australia. 2013. Th e Eff ectiveness of Work Health and Safety Interventions by Regulators: A Literature Review. Available at http://www.safeworkaustralia.gov.au/sites/SWA/about/Publications/Documents/768/Effectiveness-WHS-interventions-by-regulators-literature-review.pdf (last accessed May 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Salais, R. 2010. “La donnée n’est pas un donné pour une analyse critique de l’évaluation chiff rée de la performance” [Statistics do not stand alone: Critical analysis of the quantitative assessment of public sector performance]. Revue Francaise d’Administration Publique 135(3), 497 - 515.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schwartz, R. and J. Mayne. 2005. “Assuring the Quality of Evaluative Information: Th eory and Practice.” Evaluation and Program Planning 28(1), 1 - 14.]Search in Google Scholar
[Speklé, R. F. and F. H. M. Verbeeten. 2014. “Th e Use of Performance Measurement Systems in the Public Sector: Eff ects on Performance.” Management Accounting Research 25(2), 131 - 146.10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ter Bogt, H. J., G. Jan Van Helden and B. Van Der Kolk. 2015. “Challenging the NPM ideas about Performance Management: Selectivity and Differentiation in Outcome-Oriented Performance Budgeting.” Financial Accountability and Management 31(3), 287 - 315.]Search in Google Scholar
[Virtanen, P. and J. Vakkuri. 2015. “Searching for Organizational Intelligence in the Evolution of Public-Sector Performance Management.” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 8(2), 89 - 99.]Search in Google Scholar
[WEF. 2016. Th e Global Competitiveness Report 2016 - 2017. Available at https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2016-2017-1 (last accessed October 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[Williams, D. 2014. “Th e Evolution of the Performance Model from Black Box to the Logic Model Th rough Systems Th inking.” International Journal of Public Administration 37(13), 932 - 944.10.1080/01900692.2014.944989]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[World Bank. 2006. Good Practices for Business Inspections: Guidelines for Reformers. Available at https://www.wbginvestmentclimate.org/uploads/Bus%20Inspect%20Toolkit.pdf (last accessed May 30, 2017).]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. 2011. How to Reform Business Inspections: Design, Implementation, Challenges. Washington D.C.: World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar
[World Bank. 2016. Doing Business Report 2017. Washington D.C.: World Bank.]Search in Google Scholar