1. bookVolume 9 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Effective Legal Protection against the Excessive Length of Administrative Decision-Making: The Cases of Slovenia and Croatia

Published Online: 02 Aug 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 9 (2016) - Issue 1 (June 2016)
Page range: 135 - 166
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4309
ISSN
1337-9038
First Published
03 Aug 2009
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

In administrative matters, the parties usually have a right of access to the court and to a fair trial within a reasonable time limit, as defined by constitutions, only after the exhaustion of appeals. Judicial review is performed in a majority of states by a specialised administrative court in accordance with Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Based on a comparative research analysis of supranational and national normative law and European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) case law, this paper provides insight into the extent to which administrative matters can be reviewed in administrative disputes as well as into the legal remedies available to the parties, especially when the authorities violate time limits, focusing on the compliance of the regulation in Slovenia and Croatia with the ECHR standards. The paper also illustrates a comparative perspective of regulation in other European countries, namely Austria and Estonia. Our findings show the importance of the awareness of the necessary interplay between acts on administrative procedure and acts on administrative disputes for an effective realisation of the parties’ rights and the public interest, with administrative justice ensuring a safety net by guaranteeing an effective legal remedy.

Keywords

Administrative Justice in Europe. 2014. Report for Estonia. Available at http://www.aca-europe.eu/index.php/en/tour-d-europe-en (last accessed 9 March 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Androjna, Vilko and Erik Kerševan. 2006. Upravno procesno pravo: upravni postopek in upravni spor [Administrative Procedural Law: The administrative procedure and administrative dispute]. Ljubljana: GV Založba.Search in Google Scholar

Auburn, Jonathan, Jonathan Moffett and Andrew Sharland. 2013. Judicial Review> Principles and Procedures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Auby, Jean-Bernard (ed.). 2014. Codification of Administrative Procedure. Bruxelles: Bruylant.Search in Google Scholar

Blomeyer and Sanz. 2012. “European Added Value Assessment on a Law of Administrative Procedure of the European Union, Annex III, Aspects Relating to the Efficiency of the EU Administration.” EAVA 1/2012, III-1-III-96. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2012/494457/IPOL-JOIN_ET(2012)494457(ANN03)_EN.pdf (last accessed 14 September 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Britvić Vetma, Bosiljka. 2012. “Europska konvencija za zaštitu ljudskih prava (čl. 6.) i Zakon o upravnim sporovima iz 2010” [European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights (Art. 6.) and the Administrative Disputes Act of 2010]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 49(2), 395–410.Search in Google Scholar

Cardona, Francisco. 2005. “Checklist for general law on administrative procedures.” SIGMA. Available at http://www.sigmaweb.org/publicationsdocuments/37890936.pdf (last accessed 1 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Đanić, Ana and Lana Ofak. 2014. “Djelotvornost žalbe u upravnom sporu kao jedno od temeljnih instituta zaštite ljudskih prava” [Effectiveness of Appeal in Administrative Dispute as one of the Institutes for Protection of Human Rights]. Pravni vjesnik 30(2), 167–183.Search in Google Scholar

Đerđa, Dario and Marko Šikić. 2012. Komentar Zakona o upravnim sporovima [Commentary on the Administrative Disputes Act]. Zagreb: Novi informator.Search in Google Scholar

Dubois, Eric, Christel Schurrer and Marco Velicogna. 2013. The Functioning of Judicial Systems and the Situation of the Economy in the European Union Member States, Compiled Report. Strasbourg: CEPEJ.Search in Google Scholar

European Court of Human Rights Case Law, HUDOC. Available at http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ (last accessed 15 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Galligan, Denis J., Richard H. Langan II and Constance S. Nicandrou. 1998. Administrative Justice in the New European Democracies: Case Studies of Administrative Law and Process in Bulgaria, Estonia, Hungary, Poland and Ukraine. Oxford: Open Society Institute, Constitutional and Legislative Policy Institute and the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, University of Oxford.Search in Google Scholar

Grafenauer, Božo and Janez Breznik. 2009. Upravno pravo: procesni del [Administrative Law: Procedural section]^. Ljubljana: Gospodarski vestnik.Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, Ivan. 2006. “Upravno sudovanje u svjetlu prilagodbe standardima EU-a” [Administrative adjudication in light of adjustments to EU standards]. In Jakša Barbić (ed.). Reforma upravnog sudstva i upravnog postupanja [Reform of administrative courts and administrative procedures]. Zagreb: Hrvatska akademija znanosti i umjetnosti (HAZU), 58–63.Search in Google Scholar

Koprić, Ivan (ed.). 2014. Europeizacija upravnog sudovanja [The Europeanisation of administrative adjudication]. Zagreb: Institut za javnu upravu.Search in Google Scholar

Kovač, Polonca. 2012. “Fighting Administrative Silence in European and Slovene Law and Practice.” In Dacian C. Dragoş, François Lafarge and Paulien Willemsen (eds). Permanent Study Group: Law and Public Administration: Proceedings/33rdAnnual Conference of the European Group for Public Administration. Bucharest: Economicǎ, 79–106.Search in Google Scholar

Künnecke, Martina. 2007. Tradition and Change in Administrative Law: An Anglo-German Comparison. Berlin, New York: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Medvedović, Dragan. 2002. “Upravno sudstvo u Hrvatskoj: prilog za povijesni pregled” [The Administrative Judiciary in Croatia: Contribution to a historic overview]. In Marija Kriletić (ed.). Zbornik odluka Upravnog suda Republike Hrvatske 1977.–2002. Zagreb: Narodne novine, 1–35.Search in Google Scholar

Omejec, Jasna. 2006. “Prilog reformi upravnog spora-odnosi između Upravnog i Ustavnog sudovanja u Republici Hrvatskoj” [Contribution to the reform of administrative dispute-relationships between administrative and constitutional adjudication in the Republic of Croatia]. In Marica Kuzmić and Ante Šumelj (eds). Upravno pravo i upravni postupak u praksi – aktualna pitanja i problemi [Administrative law and administrative procedure in practice – current questions and problems]. Zagreb: Inženjerski biro, 8–22.Search in Google Scholar

“Reforma sustava upravnog sudovanja u Hrvatskoj” [Reform of the system of administrative adjudication in Croatia]. 2008. Hrvatska i komparativna javna uprava 8(3), 567–586.Search in Google Scholar

Rostaš-Beroš, Lidija. 2013. “Dileme u primjeni novog Zakonu o upravnim sporovima” [Dilemmas in the application of the new Administrative Disputes Act]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 50(2), 473–481.Search in Google Scholar

Savi, Riin and Merlilin Metsma. 2013. Public Sector Reform in Estonia: Views and Experiences from Senior Executives. Country Report as part of the COCOPS Research Project. Available at http://www.cocops.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Estonia_WP3-Country-Report.pdf (last accessed 24 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Sever, Tina, Vedran Đulabić and Polonca Kovač. 2015. “Optimization of Administrative Capacity and Procedures of Constructing Permitting in Slovenia and Croatia.” Paper presented at NISPAcee conference: Insourcing and/or Outsourcing: How do they Contribute to the Public Administration Reform ? 21–23 May 2015, Tbilisi, Georgia.Search in Google Scholar

Sever, Tina, Iztok Rakar and Polonca Kovač. 2014. “Protecting Human Rights through Fundamental Principles of Administrative Procedures in Eastern Europe.” DANUBE, Law and Economics Review 5(4), 249–275.Search in Google Scholar

Sorin, Dan. 2015. “The New Public Management is not that Bad after all: Evidence from Estonia, Hungary and Romania.” Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 44 E, 57–73.Search in Google Scholar

Statskontoret. 2005. “Principles of Good Administration in the Member States of the European Union.” Available at http://www.statskontoret.se/upload/Publikationer/2005/200504.pdf (last accessed 23 January 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Study on the Functioning of Judicial Systems in the EU Member States, Facts and Figures from the CEPEJ questionnaires 2010–2012–2013, CEPEJ(2014)17final (v2.0–16 February 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Šikić, Marko. 2008a. “Pitanja uređenja i primjene pravne zaštite od šutnje uprave u Republici Hrvatskoj” [Questions on the planning and implementation of the legal protection of administrative silence in Croatia]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Rijeci 29(1), 491–521.Search in Google Scholar

Šikić, Marko. 2008b. “Primjena pravnih fikcija u institutu zaštite građana od šutnje uprave” [The application of the legal fiction of the institute of the protection of citizens regarding administrative silence]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 45(1), 149–174.Search in Google Scholar

Šikić, Marko. 2009. “Pravo na suđenje u razumnom roku u postupcima pred Upravnim sudom Republike Hrvatske” [The right to a trial within reasonable time in proceedings before the Administrative Court of the Republic of Croatia]. Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta u Rijeci 30(1), 333–372.Search in Google Scholar

2015 EU Justice Scoreboard, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Central Bank, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions COM(2015) 116 final, European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice.Search in Google Scholar

Tour of Europe, Contribution of Austria (as of 05/11/2015). Available at http://www.aca-europe.eu/en/eurtour/i/countries/austria/austria_en.pdf (last accessed 25 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Virant, Grega and Polonca Kovač. 2010. “Reducing Administrative Burdens as Part of the ‘Better Regulation’ Programme: The Case of Slovenia.” Lex localis 8(4), 369–390.Search in Google Scholar

Venice Commission – European Commission for Democracy through Law. 2011. “Stocktaking on the Notions of ‘Good Governance’ and ‘Good Administration’, Study No. 470/2008, CDL-AD(2001)009”. Available at http://www.eods.eu/library/VC.Stocktaking%20On%20The%20Notions%20Of%20%E2%80%9CGood%20Governance%E2%80%9D%20.pdf (last accessed 2 June 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Woehrling, Jean-Marie. 2009. “Protecting Legality: Public Administration and Judiciary in EU Countries, How to Conciliate Executive Accountability and Judicial Review ?” Paper presented at the Conference on Public Administration Reform and European Integration, 26–27 March 2009, Budva, Montenegro. http://www.sigmaweb.org/publications/42755351.pdf (last accessed 20 February 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Woehrling, Jean-Marie. 2014. “Javna uprava i upravno sudovanje u zemljama Europske unije: kako pomiriti odgovornost izvršne vlasti i sudski nadzor uprave” [Public Administration and Administrative Justice in EU Countries: How to Harmonise Executive Authority Responsibility and Judicial Control of Administration]. In Ivan Koprić (ed.). Europeizacija upravnog sudovanja [The Europeanisation of Administrative Adjudication]. Zagreb: Institut za javnu upravu, 21–34.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo