Open Access

“Do the Germans Really Work Six Weeks More than the French?” – Measuring Working Time with the Labour Force Survey in France and Germany


Cite

Biemer, P. and L. Lyberg. 2003. Introduction to Survey Quality. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/0471458740Search in Google Scholar

Blanke, K. and A. Luiten. 2014. Query on Data Collection for Social Surveys. ESSnet Project “Data Collection for Social Surveys using Multiple Modes”. Available at: http://www.cros-portal.eu/content/data-collection (accessed 18 December 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Coe-Rexecode. 2012. La durée effective du travail en France et en Europe. Document de Travail no. 29. Paris: Coe-Rexecode. Available at: http://www.coe-rexecode.fr/public/content/download/32364/323546/version/2/file/Document-de-travail-Coe-Rexecode-Duree-effective-du-travail-Fance-Europe-2012-29.pdf (accessed 8 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Coe-Rexecode. 2014. La durée effective du travail en France et en Europe. Résultats de 2013 et mise à jour de l’étude de 2012. Document de Travail no. 49. Paris: Coe-Rexecode. Available at: http://www.coe-rexecode.fr/public/content/download/34852/351622/version/3/file/Doc-trav-49-Duree-du-travail-France-et-Europe-2013-Juin-2014.pdf (accessed 8 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Eurofound. 2013. Developments in Collectively Agreed Working Time 2012. Dublin: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. Available at: http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/docs/eiro/tn1305017s/tn1305017s.pdf (accessed 8 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2009. ESS Handbook for Quality Reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available at: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/EconStatKB/Attachment286.aspx?AttachmentType=1 (accessed 8 April 2016).Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2013. Labour Force Survey in the EU, Candidate and EFTA countries. Main Characteristics of National Surveys, 2012. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/product_details/publication?p_product_code=KS-TC-13-003 (accessed 13 August 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2014a. Interim Report of the Task Force on Measurement of Absences and Working Time. Working Group on Labour Market Statistics (LAMAS), June 2014. Document Eurostat/F3/LAMAS/07/14. Luxembourg: Eurostat.Search in Google Scholar

Eurostat. 2014b. Quality Report of the European Union Labour Force Survey 2013. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3888793/6194252/KS-TC-14-010-EN-N.pdf/39a79a33-4442-49b6-b83f-f0a5e81b02ef (accessed 29 June 2015).Search in Google Scholar

Fleck, S. 2009. “International Comparisons of Hours Worked: an Assessment of the Statistics.” Monthly Labor Review 5: 3–31.Search in Google Scholar

Frazis, H. and J. Stewart. 2004. “What Can Time-Use Data Tell Us About Hours of Work?” Monthly Labor Review 127: 3–9.Search in Google Scholar

Groll, T. 2014. “Arbeitszeit: Deutsche arbeiten vergleichsweise wenig.” Zeit Online Beruf 13 May 2014. Available at: http://www.zeit.de/karriere/2014-05/arbeitszeit-oecd-infografik (24 October 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R. 1989. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.10.1002/0471725277Search in Google Scholar

Groves, R. et al. 2009. Survey Methodology, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Search in Google Scholar

IAB. 2014. Durchschnittliche Arbeitszeit und Ihre Komponenten in Deutschland. Nuremberg: Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung (IAB). Available at: http://doku.iab.de/arbeitsmarktdaten/AZ_Komponenten.xlsx (accessed 21 October 2014).Search in Google Scholar

International Labour Organization (ILO). 2008. Resolution Concerning the Measurement of Working Time. Adopted by the Eighteenth International Conference of Labour Statisticians, November-December 2008. Geneva: International Labour Organization. Available at: http://www.ilo.org/global/statistics-and-databases/standards-and-guidelines/resolutions-adopted-by-international-conferences-of-labour-statisticians/WCMS_112455/lang–en/index.htm (accessed 11 August 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Körner, T. 2012. “Measuring the Labour Status in Official Statistics: The Labour Force Concept of the International Labour Organisation and its Implementation in the Labour Force Survey.” In Demographic Standards for Surveys and Polls: National and European Dimensions, edited by J. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik and U. Warner, 123–138. Cologne: GESIS 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Körner, T. 2014. “Report on the Definition, Identification and Analysis of Mode Effects.” Deliverable for Work Package III of the ESSnet on Data Collection for Social Surveys Using Multiple Modes, Wiesbaden: Federal Statistical Office Germany. Available at: http://www.cros-portal.eu/content/data-collection (accessed 18 December 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Körner, T. and A. Liersch. 2014. “Case Study on Mode Effects in the Germany Labour Force Survey.” Deliverable for Work Package III of the ESSnet on Data Collection for Social Surveys Using Multiple Modes. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. Available at: http://www.cros-portal.eu/content/data-collection (accessed 18 December 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Körner, T. and K. Puch. 2011. Coherence of German Labour Market Statistics. Vol. 19 of Statistics and Science. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Search in Google Scholar

Lefèvre, L. J. Rakotomalala, and F. Toutlemonde. 2012. “Méthodologie des comptes annuels de l’emploi, des heures travaillées et de la durée du travail dans la base 2005 de la comptabilité nationale.” Note méthodologique des comptes nationaux, Insee.Search in Google Scholar

Loriga, S. and A. Spizzichino. 2013. “Working hours: Analysis of Italian LFS Results versus Administrative Data and Business Survey.” Paper presented at the 8th Workshop on Labour Force Survey Methodology, Gdansk, Poland, 23–24 May 2013. Available at: http://old.stat.gov.pl/lfs2013/papers/F3_Silvia_Loriga,Andrea_Spizzichino_IT.pdf (accessed 24 October 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Massarelli, N. 2011. “Harmonisation Issues for the Measurement of Employment and Unemployment.” Paper presented at the 6th Workshop on LFS Methodology, Wiesbaden, Germany, 12–13 May 2011. Available at https://www.destatis.de/EN/AboutUs/Events/LFS/PapersP/G1_HarmonisationIssues_Massarelli.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (accessed 24 October 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Mata Greenwood, A. 2001. “The Hours that We Work: The Data We Need, the Data We Get.” ILO Bulletin of Labour Statistics 2001-1Search in Google Scholar

Nebel, S. et al. 2013. Implementation Study of the Model Questionnaire for the Measurement of Employment and Unemployment and the Variables of the ad hoc Module 2015 on Work Organisation and Working Time Arrangements. Final report, European Commission Grant Agreement No. 10201.2012.001-2012.961, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Search in Google Scholar

Niemi, I. 1993. “Systematic Error in Behavioural Measurement.” Social Indicators Research 30: 229–244.10.1007/BF01078729Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2004. OECD Measures of Total Hours Worked. The OECD Production Database, March 2004. Available at www.oecd.org/std/productivity-stats/29867131.pdf (accessed 10 August 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, J. et al. 2011. “The Overestimated Workweek Revisited.” Monthly Labor Review 134: 43–53.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson, J. and A. Bostrom. 1994. “The Overestimated Workweek? What Time Diary Measures Suggest.” Monthly Labor Review August 1994: 11–23.Search in Google Scholar

Spitznagel, E. 2003. “Hours and Volume of Work in Germany The IAB Concept of Measurement.” Paper presented at the Paris Group Meeting, 4–5 September 2003, London. Available at: http://www.insee.fr/en/insee-statistique-publique/colloques/citygroup/pdf/Germany-Session2.pdf (accessed August 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Statistisches Bundesamt. 2010. Ergebnisse des Projektes Q-MED/LFS. Quantifizierung von Methodeneffekten unterschiedlicher Erhebungsinstrumente auf die Datenqualitä t im Labour Force Survey. Ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt der Statistischen Ämter des Bundes und der Länder zur Qualitätssicherung im Mikrozensus/Labour Force Survey. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Search in Google Scholar

Statistisches Bundesamt. 2014. Verdienste und Arbeitskosten. Index der Tarifverdienste und Arbeitszeiten 2. Vierteljahr 2014. Fachserie 16 Reihe 4.3, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt. Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/VerdiensteArbeitskosten/Tarifverdienste/Tarifverdienst2160430143224.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (accessed September 2014).Search in Google Scholar

Tourangeau, R., L. Rips, and K. Rasinski. 2000. The Psychology of Survey Response. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511819322Search in Google Scholar

Vallé, J. et al. 2014. Implementation Study of the Model Questionnaire for the Measurement of Absences and Working Time and the ad hoc Module 2016 on Young People on the Labour Market. Final report, European Commission Grant Agreement no. 07131.2013.001-2013.372, Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.Search in Google Scholar

Villund, O. 2009. Measuring Working Hours in the Norwegian Labour Force Survey: A Pilot Study of Data Quality Using Administrative Registers. Report 2009/3, Oslo–Kongsvinger: Statistisk sentralbyrå.Search in Google Scholar

Wanger, S. 2013. “Arbeitszeit und Arbeitsvolumen in Deutschland – Methodische Grundlagen und Ergebnisse der Arbeitszeitrechnung.” Wirtschafts- und Sozialstatistisches Archiv 7: 31–69.10.1007/s11943-013-0127-0Search in Google Scholar

Williams, R. 2002. “Hours Worked: A Comparison of Estimates from the Labour Force and New Earnings Survey.” Labour Market Trends 110: 429–441.Search in Google Scholar

Williams, R. 2004. “Investigating hours worked measurements.” Labour Market Trends 112: 71–80.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2001-7367
Language:
English
Publication timeframe:
4 times per year
Journal Subjects:
Mathematics, Probability and Statistics