[Aires, N. 2000a. “Comparisons Between Conditional Poisson Sampling and Pareto πps sampling designs.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 82: 115.10.1016/S0378-3758(99)00205-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Aires, N. 2000b. Techniques to Calculate Exact Inclusion Probabilities for Conditional Poisson Sampling and Pareto πps Sampling Designs. Doctoral thesis. Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University, Sweden. Available at: http://www.math.chalmers.se/Stat/Research/Preprints/Doctoral/2000/1.pdf (accessed October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Arthnari, T. and Y. Dodge. 1981. Mathematical Programming in Statistics. New York: Wiley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berger, Y. 1998. “Rate of Convergence for Asymptotic Variance for the Horvitz-Thompson Estimator.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 74: 149–168. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(98)00107-4.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bondesson, L., I. Traat, and A. Lundqvist. 2006. “Pareto Sampling Versus Sampford and Conditional Poisson Sampling.” Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 33: 699–720.10.1111/j.1467-9469.2006.00497.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Brewer, K., L. Early, and S. Joyce. 1972. “Selecting Several Samples From a Single Population.” Australian Journal of Statistics 3: 231–239. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-842X.1972.tb00899.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[Broström, G. and L. Nilsson. 2000. “Acceptance-Rejection Sampling From the Conditional Distribution of Independent Discrete Random Variables, Given Their Sum.” Statistics 34: 247–257. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02331880008802716.]Search in Google Scholar
[Causey, B.D., L.H. Cox, and L.R. Ernst. 1985. “Application of Transportation Theory to Statistical Problems.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 80: 903–909. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1985.10478201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, S., A. Dempster, and J. Liu. 1994. “Weighted Finite Population Sampling to Maximize Entropy.” Biometrika 81: 457–469. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/81.3.457.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chen, S. and J. Liu. 1997. “Statistical Applications of the Poisson-Binomial and Conditional Bernoulli Distributions.” Statistica Sinica 7: 875–892. Available at: http://www3.stat.sinica.edu.tw/statistica/oldpdf/A7n44.pdf (accessed October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cotton, F. and C. Hesse. 1992. Tirages Coordonnés d’Échantillons. Technical Report E9206, Direction des Statistiques Économiques, INSEE, Paris, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deville, J.-C. 2000. Note Sur l’Algorithme de Chen, Dempster et Liu. Technical Report, CREST-ENSAI, Rennes, France.]Search in Google Scholar
[Deville, J.-C. and Y. Tillé. 2004. “Efficient Balanced Sampling: The Cube Method.” Biometrika 91: 893–912. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/91.4.893.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dupacová, J. 1979. “A Note on Rejective Sampling.” In Contributions to Statistics: Jaroslav Hájek Memorial Volume, edited by J. Jurecková, 71–78. Prague: Academia.10.1007/978-94-009-9362-4_9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, L.R. 1996. “Maximizing the Overlap of Sample Units For Two Designs With Simultaneous Selection.” Journal of Official Statistics 12: 33–45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, L.R. 1998. “Maximizing and Minimizing Overlap When Selecting a Large Number of Units per Stratum Simultaneously For Two Designs.” Journal of Official Statistics 14: 297–314.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, L.R. 1999. “The Maximization and Minimization of Sample Overlap Problems: a Half Century of Results.” Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, Proceedings, Tome LVIII, Book 2, 293–296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, L.R. and M.M. Ikeda. 1995. “A Reduced-size Transportation Algorithm For Maximizing the Overlap Between Surveys.” Survey Methodology 21: 147–157.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ernst, L.R. and S.P. Paben. 2002. “Maximizing and Minimizing Overlap When Selecting Any Number of Units Per Stratum Simultaneously For Two Designs With Different Stratications.” Journal of Official Statistics 18: 185–202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fattorini, L. 2006. “Applying the Horvitz-Thompson Criterion In Complex Designs: a Computer-intensive Perspective for Estimating Inclusion Probabilities.” Biometrika 93: 269–278. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/93.2.269.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fattorini, L. 2009. “An Adaptive Algorithm For Estimating Inclusion Probabilities and Performing the Horvitz-Thompson Criterion In Complex Designs.” Computational Statistics 24: 623–639. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00180-009-0149-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[Grafström, A. 2010. “Entropy of Unequal Probability Sampling Designs.” Statistical Methodology 7: 84–97. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stamet.2009.10.005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hájek, J. 1964. “Asymptotic Theory of Rejective Sampling With Varying Probabilities From a Finite Population.” Annals of Mathematical Statistics 35: 1491–1523.10.1214/aoms/1177700375]Search in Google Scholar
[Hájek, J. 1981. Sampling from a Finite Population. New York: Marcel Dekker.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haziza, D., F. Mecatti, and J.N.K. Rao. 2008. “Evaluation of Some Approximate Variance Estimators Under the Rao-Sampford Unequal Probability Sampling Design.” METRON - International Journal of Statistics LXVI: 91–108. Available at: http://www.research-gate.net/profile/Fulvia_Mecatti/publication/227458252_Evaluation_of_some_approximate_variance_estimators_under_the_Rao-Sampford_unequal_probability_sampling_design/links/00b7d5268caea36e5d000000.pdf (accessed October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Keytz, N. 1951. “Sampling With Probabilities Proportional to Size: Adjustment For Changes In the Probabilities.” Journal of American Statistics Association 46: 105–109. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1951.10500773.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kish, L., and A. Scott. 1971. “Retaining Units After Changing Strata and Probabilites.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 66: 461–470. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1971.10482286.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mach, L., P.T. Reiss, and I. Schiopu-Kratina. 2006. “Optimizing the Expected Overlap of Survey Samples Via the Northwest Corner Rule.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 101: 1671–1679. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/016214506000000320.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matei, A. and C. Skinner. 2009. “Optimal Sample Coordination Using Controlled Selection.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 139: 3112–3121. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2009.02.012.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matei, A. and Y. Tillé. 2005a. “Evaluation of Variance Approximations and Estimators In Maximum Entropy Sampling With Unequal Probability and Mixed Sample Size.” Journal of Official Statistics 21: 543–570.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matei, A. and Y. Tillé. 2005b. “Maximal and Minimal Sample Co-ordination.” Sankhyā 67: 590–612.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nedyalkova, D., J. Pea, and Y. Tillé. 2008. “Sampling Procedures For Coordinating Stratified Samples: Methods Based On Microstrata.” International Statistical Review 76: 368–386. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2008.00057.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[Nedyalkova, D., L. Qualité, and Y. Tillé. 2009. “General Framework For the Rotation of Units In Repeated Survey Sampling.” Statistica Neerlandica 63: 269–293. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2009.00423.x.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlsson, E. 1995. “Coordination of Samples Using Permanent Random Numbers.” In Business Survey Methods, edited by B.G. Cox, D.A. Binder, B.N. Chinnapa, A. Christianson, M.J. Colledge, and P.S. Kott. 153–169. New York: Wiley.10.1002/9781118150504.ch9]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlsson, E. 1998. “Sequential Poisson Sampling.” Journal of Official Statistics 14: 149–162.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ohlsson, E. 2000. Coordination of PPS Samples Over Time. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Establishment Surveys, June 17–21, 2000 Buffalo, New York. 255–264. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Raj, D. 1968. Sampling Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosén, B. 1991. Variance estimation for systematic pps-sampling. Technical Report 1991:15, Statistics Sweden.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosén, B. 1997a. “Asymptotic Theory For Order Sampling.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 62: 135–158. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(96)00185-1.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosén, B. 1997b. “On Sampling With Probability Proportional To Size.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 62: 159–191. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(96)00186-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosén, B. 2000. “On Inclusion Probabilties For Order πps Sampling.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 90: 117–143. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00104-X.]Search in Google Scholar
[Saavedra, P. 1995. “Fixed Sample Size PPS Approximations With a Permanent Random Number.” In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, August 13–17, 1995, Orlando, Florida. 697–700. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schiopu-Kratina, I., J.M. Fillion, L. Mach, and P.T. Reiss. 2014. “Maximizing the Conditional Overlap in Business Surveys.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 149: 98–115. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2014.02.002.]Search in Google Scholar
[Särndal, C.-E., B. Swensson, and J. Wretman. 1992. Model Assisted Survey Sampling. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-4378-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Thompson, M.E. and C. Wu. 2008. “Simulation-based Randomized Systematic PPS Sampling Under Substitution of Units.” Survey Methodology 34: 3–10. Available at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228887421_Simulation-based_randomized_systematic_PPS_sampling_under_substitution_of_units (assessed October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillé, Y. 2006. Sampling Algorithms. New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillé, Y. and D. Haziza. 2010. “An Interesting Property of the Entropy of Some Sampling Designs.” Survey Methodology 36: 229–231. Available at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228454231_An_Interesting_Property_of_the_Entropy_of_Some_Sampling_Designs (accessed October 2015).]Search in Google Scholar
[Traat, I., L. Bondesson, and K. Meister. 2004. “Sampling Design and Sample Selection Through Distribution Theory.” Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 123: 395–413. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3758(03)00150-2.]Search in Google Scholar
