1. bookVolume 7 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2543-831X
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

A Holistic Synthesis of the Organisation Theories

Published Online: 31 May 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 7 (2015) - Issue 4 (December 2015)
Page range: 5 - 19
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2543-831X
First Published
25 Apr 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Much literature exists on the topic of ‘organisation’. Many different academic disciplinary areas stake their claim to aspects of business organisation. The social sciences offer many different perspectives of the phenomena associated with it; as different lenses, through which the object is perceived very differently. According to social constructivists, the business organisation is socially constructed. For psychologists, it exists at the nexus of individual human needs. For economists, the business organisation operates as a mechanism responding to signals of supply and demand. In this paper the business organisation is re-imaged as an entity existing within, and comprised of, chaotic systems. On the basis of a synthesis of seminal theory this paper attempts to offer a holistic perspective of business organisations; that ‘pulls together’ these multidisciplinary perspectives. On the basis of this synthesis, it is argued that the organisational context is inherently endogenous, and that qualitative research methods might offer management scientists a more valid perspective of the relationships within organisations than empirical methods can.

Allen, P. M. (1998). Dynamic models of evolving systems. System Dynamics Review, 4: 109-130.Search in Google Scholar

Caterino, M. S., Cho, S., and Sperling, F. A. H. 2000. The Current State of Insect Molecular Systematics: A Thriving Tower of Babel. Annual Review of Entomolog y, 45: 1-54.Search in Google Scholar

Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386-405.10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.xSearch in Google Scholar

Grant, R. M. 1996. Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17:109-122.10.1002/smj.4250171110Search in Google Scholar

Hannan, M. T., and Freeman, J. 1977. The Population Ecology of Organizations. The American Journal of Sociolog y, 82(5):929-964.10.1086/226424Search in Google Scholar

Klein, K. J., Conn, A. B., Smith, D. B., & Sorra, J. S. (2001). Is Everyone in Agreement? An Exploration of Within-Group Agreement in Employee Perceptions of the Work Environment. Journal of Applied Psycholog y, 86(1), 2-16.10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.3Search in Google Scholar

Klein, K. J., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2000). From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 211- 236.10.1177/109442810033001Search in Google Scholar

Levy, D. 1994. Chaos Theory and Strategy: Theory, Application, and Managerial Implications. Strategic Management Journal, 15: 167-178.Search in Google Scholar

Mayer, K.J., and Sparrowe, R.T. 2013. Integrating theories in AMJ articles. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 917-922.Search in Google Scholar

Mills, A. 2010. Complexity Science. An introduction (and invitation) for actuaries. Available at: http://www.google.co.za/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CDAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.soa.org%2Ffiles%2Fresearch%2Fprojects%2Fresearch-complexity-report.pdf&ei=YwzQUZWjE4TcPZbIgdgB&usg=AFQjCNFfAM1LYUUJ3TBePDucLP_hj4R2qA&sig2=FSEuDQiC8jAKdlrpoAMehA&bvm=bv.48572450,d.ZWU (Accessed 30 June 2013)Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo