1. bookVolume 11 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2228-0987
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Metaphor and Metonymy in Ancient Dream Interpretation: the Case of Islamic-Iranian Culture

Published Online: 27 Jan 2018
Volume & Issue: Volume 11 (2017) - Issue 2 (December 2017)
Page range: 69 - 83
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2228-0987
First Published
16 Apr 2016
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This paper aims to investigate the relevance of metaphor and metonymy to ancient dream interpretation in Islamic-Iranian culture. To this end, a most-referenced book of dream interpretation is analysed according to the conceptual metaphor theory. The results show that metaphor and metonymy play an important role in this ancient discourse. The metaphorical dream is based either on a resemblance between the dream as the source domain and its interpretation as the target domain, or on some symbolic metaphors arising from cultural conventions. The metonymic dream is formed by a contiguous relationship between the dream as the vehicle entity and its interpretation as the target entity. Concerning metaphorical dream interpretation, it can be argued that the overt content of the dream is mapped onto the latent content by resemblance or cultural convention. As regards metonymic dream interpretation, it can be said that the overt content of the dream is mapped onto the latent content by a conceptual metonymy based on socio-physical context. In addition, there are two other procedures of dream interpretation based on realistic representation and the technique of reversion. These cases do not apply figurative devices like metaphor and metonymy. Also, the dreamer’s personal knowledge of his or her life does not play a significant role in the discourse of dream interpretation in Islamic-Iranian culture.

Keywords

Akbari, Mohammad-Reza. 1991. Tabiire Xabe Moaberane Iranii va Ghere Irani. Tehran: Ordibehesht.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Suhrawardi, Shihab al-Din. 2001. Hikmat al-Ishraq. Tehran: Hekmat.Search in Google Scholar

Ebne Sirin, M. 2002. Dream Interpretation. Qom: Lahiji.Search in Google Scholar

Freeman, Margaret. 2003. Poetry and the Scope of Metaphor: Toward a Cognitive Theory of Literature. – Metaphor and Metonymy at the Cross-Road: A Cognitive Perspective, edited by Antonio Barcelona. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, 253–281.Search in Google Scholar

Freud, Sigmund. 2010 [1955]. The Interpretation of Dreams, translated by James Strachey. New York, NY: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Grady, Joseph. 1999. A Typological Motivation for Conceptual Metaphor: Correlation vs. Resemblance. – Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, edited by Raymond Gibbs and Gerard Steen. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company, 79–100.10.1075/cilt.175.06graOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hiraga, Masako K. 2005. Metaphor and Iconicity. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmilan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510708.10.1057/9780230510708Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Holyoak, Keith J. and Paul Thagard. 1995. Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/4549.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman. 2002. The Metaphor and Metonymic Poles. – Linguistics and Literary Critisism, edited by Farzän Sojudi and Maryam Khuzan. Tehran: Ney Publishers, 39–46.Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford; New Yord, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Ecrits, translated by Bruce Fink, Heloise Fink and Russell Grigg. New York, NY; London: W. W. Norton and Company.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 1992. Metaphor, The Language of the Unconscious, The Theory of Conceptual Metaphor Applied to Dream Interpretation. Santa Cruz, CA: University of California, Santa Cruz.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George. 2007. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. – The Cognitive Linguistic Reader, edited by Vyvyan Evans, Benjamin Bergen and Jörg Zinken. London; Oakville: Equinox, 267–315.Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, George and Mark Johnson. 2003 [1980]. Metaphors We Live By. London: University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001.10.7208/chicago/9780226470993.001.0001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Merrell, Floyd. 2001. Charles Sandres Peirce’s Concept of the Sign. – The Routledge Copanion to Semiotics and Linguistics, edited by Paul Cobley. London; New York, NY: Routledge, 28–39.Search in Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1998. Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 2. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Search in Google Scholar

Pragglejaz Group. 2007. MIP: A Method for Identifying Metaphorically Used Words in Discourse. – Metaphor and Symbol 22 (1), 1–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752.10.1080/10926480709336752Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Richards, Ivor Armstrong. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London; Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sheykholeslami, Ali. 2011. Khyal, Mesal va Jamal dar Erfane Eslami. Tehran: Matn.Search in Google Scholar

Short, Thomas L. 2007. Peirce’s Theory of Signs. Cambridge; New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511498350.10.1017/CBO9780511498350Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tabatabai, Muhammad Husayn. 1971. Almizan fi Tafsir, translated by Mohammad Baqer Musavi. Tehran: Mohammadi.Search in Google Scholar

Teflisi, Abolfazl Kamaladdin Habishe Ebne Ebrahim Ben Mohhammad. 1992. Kamelo Tabiir. Qom: Rauf.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo