[1. Barton GR, Irvine L, Flather M, et al. Economic Evaluation of Complete Revascularization for Patients with Multivessel Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Value Health. 2017;20:745-751. doi: 10.101622.10.1016/j.jval.2017.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Dubey G, Verma SK, Bahl VK. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: Outcomes and determinants of outcomes: A tertiary care center study from North India. Indian Heart J. 2017;69:294-298. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2016.11.322.10.1016/j.ihj.2016.11.322]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, et al. Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2816-2821. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096.10.1016/j.jacc.2009.11.096]Search in Google Scholar
[4. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361.10.1056/NEJMoa1205361]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503-1516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070829.10.1056/NEJMoa070829]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Kwon JE, Lee WS, Mintz GS, et al. Multimodality Intravascular Imaging Assessment of Plaque Erosion versus Plaque Rupture in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome. Korean Circ J. 2016;46:499-506. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2016.46.4.499.10.4070/kcj.2016.46.4.499]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dong L, Mintz GS, Witzenbichler B, et al. Comparison of plaque characteristics in narrowings with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI/unstable angina pectoris and stable coronary artery disease (from the DAPTDES IVUS Substudy). Am J Cardiol. 2015;115:860-866. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.008.10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.008]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Zheng B, Mintz GS, McPherson JA, et al. Predictors of Plaque Rupture Within Nonculprit Fibroatheromas in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: The PROSPECT Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:1180-1187. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.014.10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.06.014]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Acharjee S, Teo KK, Jacobs AK et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention in women with stable coronary disease: A pre-specified subset analysis of the Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive druG Evaluation (COURAGE) trial. Am Heart J. 2016;173:108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.020.10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.020]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1503-1516. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa070829.10.1056/NEJMoa070829]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Andreini D, Pontone G, Mushtaq S, et al. A long-term prognostic value of coronary CT angiography in suspected coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5:690-701. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.00910.1016/j.jcmg.2012.03.009]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Cademartiri F, Seitun S, Clemente A, et al. Myocardial blood flow quantification for evaluation of coronary artery disease by computed tomography. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:129-150. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.22.10.21037/cdt.2017.03.22]Search in Google Scholar
[13. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, et al. Fractional flow reserveguided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa120536110.1056/NEJMoa1205361]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Mollet N, Maffei E, Martini C, et al. Coronary plaque burden in patients with stable and unstable coronary artery disease using multislice CT coronary angiography. Radiol Med. 2011;116:1174-1187. doi: 10.1007/s11547-011-0722-5.10.1007/s11547-011-0722-5]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Dalager MG, Bøttcher M, Thygesen J, Andersen G, Bøtker HE. Different Plaque Composition and Progression in Patients with Stable and Unstable Coronary Syndromes Evaluated by Cardiac CT. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:401357. doi: 10.1155/2015/401357.10.1155/2015/401357]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Peng K. Transluminal attenuation gradient and corrected models in coronary CT angiography for determining stenosis severity: a primary study using dual-source CT. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:508-516. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.003.10.1016/j.crad.2017.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Kim HJ, Kim SM, Choi JH, et al. Influence of scan technique on intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography using 128-slice dual source CT: multi-beat versus one-beat scan. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33:937-946. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1078-2.10.1007/s10554-017-1078-2]Search in Google Scholar
[18. De Cecco CN, Caruso D, Baumann S, et al. Coronary CT angiography derived morphological and functional quantitative plaque markers correlated with invasive fractional flow reserve for detecting hemodynamically significant stenosis. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016;10:199-206. doi: 0.1016/j.jcct.2016.03.002.10.1016/j.jcct.2016.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Choi JH, Min JK, Labounty TM, et al. Intracoronary transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary CT angiography for determining coronary artery stenosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4:1149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.006.10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.09.006]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Benedek T, Jako B, Benedek I. Plaque Quantification by Coronary CT and Intravascular Ultrasound Identifies a Low CT Density Core as a Marker of Plaque Instability in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Int Heart J. 2014;55:22-29.10.1536/ihj.13-213]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Benedek I, Bucur O, Benedek T. Intracoronary infusion of mononuclear bone marrow derived stem cells is associated with lower plaque burden after 4 years. J Atheroscler Thromb. 2014;21:217-229.10.5551/jat.19745]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Benedek T, Gyöngyösi M, Benedek I. Multislice computed tomographic coronary angiography for quantitative assessment of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes. Can J Cardiol. 2013;29:364-371. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.004.10.1016/j.cjca.2012.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Chow BJ, Kass M, Gagné O, et al. Can differences in corrected coronary opacification measured with computed tomography predict resting coronary artery flow? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1280-1288. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.07210.1016/j.jacc.2010.09.072]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Collet C, Onuma Y, Serruys PW, et al. Integration of noninvasive functional assessments with anatomical risk stratification in complex coronary artery disease: the noninvasive functional SYNTAX score. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2017;7:151-158. doi: 10.21037/cdt.2017.03.19.10.21037/cdt.2017.03.19]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Han D, Starikov A, Ó Hartaigh B, et al. Relationship Between Endothelial Wall Shear Stress and High-Risk Atherosclerotic Plaque Characteristics for Identification of Coronary Lesions That Cause Ischemia: A Direct Comparison With Fractional Flow Reserve. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5pii:e004186.10.1161/JAHA.116.004186]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Wong DT, Ko BS, Cameron JD, et al. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:1271-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.029.10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.029]Search in Google Scholar