1. bookVolume 65 (2014): Issue 2 (December 2014)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4287
First Published
05 Mar 2010
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Vzťah Prefixácie, Vidu a Valencie

Published Online: 13 Mar 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 65 (2014) - Issue 2 (December 2014)
Page range: 123 - 137
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1338-4287
First Published
05 Mar 2010
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Literature has pointed out to the existence of two kinds of aspectual prefixes in Slavic languages - external or superlexical and internal or lexical - which differ in the ability to mark telicity and alter argument structure. The study discusses the two kinds of prefixes in Slovak on the basis of scalarity underlying telicity. External prefixes are nonscalar, they express an event is bounded in time but not inherently delimited. They are ±telic and they do not alter argument structure. In contrast, internal prefixes are scalar, because they refer to a scale that measures the event. They are +telic because they denote a boundary on the scale. They can alter argument structure because the event participant measured by a scale must be obligatorily realized as subject or direct object. There are three cases of argument structure alternation: 1. an optionally transitive verb becomes an obligatorily transitive prefixed verb, 2. an intransitive verb becomes an obligatorily transitive prefixed verb with unselected direct object, 3. an intransitive verb becomes an obligatorily reflexive prefixed verb with unselected reflexive marker sa, which I consider a kind of direct object.

Keywords

BEAVERS, John: Scalar complexity and the structure of events. In: Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation. Eds. J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow a M. Schäfer. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter 2008, s. 245 - 265.10.1515/9783110925449.245Search in Google Scholar

DANEŠ, František: Věta a text. Studie ze syntaxe spisovné češtiny. Praha: Academia 1985. 236 s.Search in Google Scholar

DANEŠ, František: Větné vzorce v češtině. Praha: Academia 1987. 276 s.Search in Google Scholar

DEPRAETERE, Ilse: On the necessity of distinguishing between (un)boundedness and (a)telicity. In: Linguistics and Philosophy, 1995, roč.18, č. 1, s. 1 - 19.10.1007/BF00984959Search in Google Scholar

DUŠKOVÁ , Libuše - STRNA DOVÁ , Zdenka - KN ITTLOVÁ , Dagmar - PEPRNÍK, Jaroslav - TÁRNYIKOVÁ , Jarmila: Mluvnice současné angličtiny na pozadí češtiny. Praha: Academia 1988. 673 s.Search in Google Scholar

DE SWART, Henriette: Aspect shift and coercion. In: Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1998, roč. 16, č. 2, s. 347 - 385.10.1023/A:1005916004600Search in Google Scholar

DI SCIULLO , Anne Marie - SLA BAKOVA , Roumyana: Quantification and aspect. In: Perspectives on aspect. Eds. H. Verkuyl - H. de Swart - A . van Hout. Dordrecht: Springer 2005, s. 61 - 80.10.1007/1-4020-3232-3_4Search in Google Scholar

FILIP, Hana: Aspect, eventuality types and nominal reference. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group (Garland) 1999. 312 s.Search in Google Scholar

FILIP, Hana: Events and maximalization. In: Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect. Ed. S. Rothstein. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2008, s. 217 - 256.10.1075/la.110.10filSearch in Google Scholar

FRANKOVÁ , Monika: Vplyv formantu sa na intenčnú hodnotu slovies. In: Varia XV. Zborník materiálov z XV. kolokvia mladých jazykovedcov. Eds. A. Gálisová - A . Chomová. Bratislava: Slovenská jazykovedná spoločnosť pri SAV a FHV UMB 2008, s. 123 - 130.Search in Google Scholar

HAY, Jennifer - KENN EDY, Christopher - LEVIN, Beth: Scalar structure underlies telicity in “degree achievements”. In: Proceedings of SAL T [Semantics and Linguistic Theory] 9. Eds. T. Mathews - D. Strolovitch. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University 1999, s. 127 - 144.10.3765/salt.v9i0.2833Search in Google Scholar

HORECKÝ, Ján: Slovotvorná sústava slovenčiny. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo SAV 1959. 217 s.Search in Google Scholar

JACKENDOFF, Ray: The proper treatment of measuring out, telicity, and perhaps even quantification in English. In: Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 1996, roč. 14, č. 2, s. 305 - 354.10.1007/BF00133686Search in Google Scholar

JANOČKOVÁ , Nicol: O kosémii predponových slovies. In: Slovenská reč, 2002, roč. 67, č. 6, s. 321 - 329.Search in Google Scholar

JANOČKOVÁ , Nicol: Slovotvorné a sémantické súvislosti slovesného vidu v slovenčine. (K štatútu slovesného vidu v slovenčine). In: Slovenská reč, 2004, roč. 69, č. 2, s. 65 - 84.Search in Google Scholar

JAROŠOVÁ , Alexandra: Vidová opozícia a vidová korelácia v slovenčine. In: Jazykovedný časopis, 2013, roč. 64, č. 1, s. 5 - 47.10.2478/jazcas-2013-0001Search in Google Scholar

KAČALA , Ján: Sloveso a sémantická štruktúra vety. Bratislava: VEDA 1989. 254 s.Search in Google Scholar

KAGAN , Olga: Degree semantics for Russian verbal prefixes: The case of pod- and do-. In: Oslo Studies in Language, 2012, roč. 4, č. 1, s. 207 - 243.10.5617/osla.144Search in Google Scholar

MILIĆEVIĆ, Nataša: The lexical and superlexical verbal prefix iz- and its role in the stacking of prefixes. In: Nordlyd, 2004, roč. 32, č. 2, s. 279 - 300. Morfológia slovenského jazyka. Ed. J. Ružička. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo SAV 1966. 895 s.10.7557/12.70Search in Google Scholar

OLSEN, Mari Broman: The semantics and pragmatics of lexical aspect features. In: Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 1994, roč. 24, č. 1 - 2, s. 361 - 375.Search in Google Scholar

PAULINY, Eugen: Slovenská gramatika. (Opis jazykového systému.). Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo 1981. 328 s.Search in Google Scholar

PECIAR, Štefan: O homonymii slovesných predpôn. In: Slovenská reč, 1962, roč. 27, č. 1, s. 3 - 22.Search in Google Scholar

PECIAR, Štefan: Obmedzovací význam predpony po- v slovenčine. In: Slovenská reč, 1963, roč. 28, č. 2, s. 65 - 77.Search in Google Scholar

RAPPAPORT HOVAV , Malka - LEVIN, Beth: Reflections on manner/result complementarity. In: Syntax, lexical semantics, and event structure. Eds. M. Rappaport Hovav - E. Doron - I. Sichel. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010, s. 21 - 38.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199544325.003.0002Search in Google Scholar

RAPPAPORT HOVAV , Malka: Lexicalized meaning and the internal temporal structure of events. In: Theoretical and crosslinguistic approaches to the semantics of aspect. Ed. S. Rothstein. Amsterdam - Philadelphia: John Benjamins 2008, s. 13 - 42.10.1075/la.110.03hovSearch in Google Scholar

SEKAN INOVÁ , Ella: Sémantická analýza predponového slovesa v ruštine a slovenčine. Bratislava: Veda 1980. 199 s.Search in Google Scholar

SMITH, Carlota S.: The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer 1997. 349 s.10.1007/978-94-011-5606-6Search in Google Scholar

SOKOLOVÁ , Miloslava: Kapitolky zo slovenskej morfológie. Prešov: Slovacontact 1995. 180s.Search in Google Scholar

SOKOLOVÁ , Miloslava: Sémantika slovesa a aspektové formy. In: Aspektuálnosť a modálnosť v slovenčine. Ed. M. Ivanová. Prešov: Prešovská univerzita v Prešove 2009, s. 22 - 37.Search in Google Scholar

SOUČKOVÁ , Kateřina: There is only one po-. In: Nordlyd, 2004, roč. 32, č. 2, s. 403 - 419.10.7557/12.74Search in Google Scholar

SVENONIUS, Peter: Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. In: Nordlyd, 2004, roč. 32, č. 2, s. 194 - 242.10.7557/12.68Search in Google Scholar

TENNY, Carol: Aspectual roles and the syntax-semantics interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer 1994. 260 s.10.1007/978-94-011-1150-8Search in Google Scholar

TUROČEKOVÁ , Monika: Zmena intenčnej hodnoty prefixáciou (na príklade pohybových slovies). Martin: Matica slovenská 2012. 281 s.Search in Google Scholar

UHER, František: Slovesné předpony. Brno: Univerzita J. E. Purkyně 1987. 212 s.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo