Open Access

Psychological contract breach and turnover intention: the moderating effects of social status and local ties


Cite

Figure 1

Proposed model of study.
Proposed model of study.

Figure 2

Social status as a moderator of psychological contract breach and turnover intentions.
Social status as a moderator of psychological contract breach and turnover intentions.

Figure 3

Junior Officer-to-Senior Officer Connectedness as a moderator of psychological contract breach and turnover intentions. JO = Junior Officer; SO = Senior Officer.
Junior Officer-to-Senior Officer Connectedness as a moderator of psychological contract breach and turnover intentions. JO = Junior Officer; SO = Senior Officer.

Mean values, standard deviations (S.D.), and correlations of variables

MeanS.D.12345678910111213
1Age--1
2Gender--0.0531
3Current organisational level--0.263

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.0691
4Education on enlistment--0.166

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.134

p< 0.05(two-tailed).

-0.1231
5Rank--0.471

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.1240.385

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.317

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1
6Organisational tenure--0.613

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.0800.359

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.322

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.771

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1
7PCB3.280.66-0.0120.110-0.163

p< 0.05(two-tailed).

0.081-0.064-0.0621
8Transactional PCB2.900.870.1130.032-0.0110.129

p< 0.05(two-tailed).

-0.0350.0500.676

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1
9Relational PBC3.500.79-0.1070.113-0.196

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.0230.078-0.1200.888

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.298

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1
10Social status-0.380.710.183

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.0680.420

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.0450.256

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.196

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.352

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.055-0.428

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1
11Junior Officer-to-Junior Officer CSS3.650.70-0.187

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.114-0.081-0.011-0.247

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.182

p< 0.05(two-tailed).

-0.272

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.147-0.245

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.188

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1
12Junior Officer-to-Senior Officer CSS3.370.820.059-0.184

p< 0.05(two-tailed).

0.1140.124-0.0110.038-0.464

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.098-0.569

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.400

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.354

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1
13Turnover intentions3.281.050.0980.200

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.021-0.0340.259

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.229

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.325

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

0.0910.373

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.118-0.202

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

-0.329

p< 0.01 level (two-tailed);

1

Regression results testing the direct and moderation hypotheses

VariablesTurnover intentions
Model 1.2Model 1.2.1Model 1.3Model 1.4Model 2.3Model 2.4Model 3.3Model 3.4
1
Control variables
Age-0.1290.098-0.1180.094-0.175-0.164-0.157-0.134
Gender-0.145

p <0.05

-0.152

p <0.05

-0.147

p <0.05

0.1389

p <0.05

-0.153

p <0.05

-0.150

p <0.05

-0.137

p <0.05

-0.127

p <0.05

Level-0.0240.0010.0120.032-0.0700.0680.0130.015
Education0.1160.1350.1100.1130.1420.1400.161

p <0.05

0.150
Rank0.223

p <0.05

0.182

p <0.05

0.237

p <0.05

-0.242

p <0.05

-0.212-0.207-0.202

p <0.05

-0.201

p <0.05

Tenure0.1780.2090.1640.1610.1750.1720.225

p <0.05

0.212
2
Independent variable
PCB0.320

p <0.001

0.308

p <0.001

0.329

p <0.001

0.240

p <0.01

0.248

p <0.01

0.193

p <0.01

0.203

p <0.01

Transactional PCB0.029
Relational PCB0.395

p <0.001

Social status (SS)0.067-0.075
JOCSS0.099-0.115
socss0.234

p <0.01

-0.260

p <0.001

3
Moderators
PCB × SS0.135

p <0.05

PCB × JOCSS0.059
PCB × SOCSS0.133

p <0.05

R20.2120.2560.2210.2370.1790.1820.2520.268
Ad R2j0.1880.2300.1930.2070.1420.1400.2250.238
DR20.0980.1420.1060.0030.127
F8.847

p <0.001

9.987

p <0.001

7.995

p <0.001

7.767

p <0.001

4.848

p <0.001

4.374

p <0.001

9.228

p <0.001

8.865

p <0.001