Skip to content
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Library Services
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Journal Matcher
Blog
Contact
Search
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
International and Comparative Law Review
Volume 15 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
Open Access
Previous witness testimony as immediate or urgent action and its admissibility in court
Veronika Pochylá
Veronika Pochylá
Faculty of Law, Palacký University Olomouc,
Olomouc, Czech Republic
Search for this author on
Sciendo
|
Google Scholar
Pochylá, Veronika
Jan 24, 2018
International and Comparative Law Review
Volume 15 (2015): Issue 2 (December 2015)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Download Cover
Published Online:
Jan 24, 2018
Page range:
145 - 159
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/iclr-2016-0041
Keywords
Adversarial principle
,
contradictory
,
fair trial
,
testimony
,
witness
,
urgent or unrepeatable act
,
admissibility of evidence
,
read testimony
,
absent witness
,
Hearsay rule
© 2018
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
