1. bookVolume 60 (2016): Issue 2 (June 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-7837
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Open Access

Interobserver Variation in Canine Hip Dysplasia Evaluation

Published Online: 06 Jul 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 60 (2016) - Issue 2 (June 2016)
Page range: 29 - 33
Received: 21 Mar 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2453-7837
First Published
30 Mar 2016
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Canine hip dysplasia (CHD) is a common disease representing an important problem for many dog breeds worldwide. The screening for CHD and breeding programs have been ongoing for many decades but the incidence of disease have failed to be reduced to the expected level. The early diagnosis of CHD is paramount in order to facilitate the early management strategies and to prevent the breeding of the affected individuals. Generally in this area, the emphasis is placed on the radiographic evaluation process, however this is partly a subjective process suggested to be influenced by the experience of the observers. This study was designed to evaluate the interobserver agreement in CHD evaluation based on the Federation Cynologique International system (FCI system). Ten original radiographs were sent to five different groups of observers, from students to certified veterinarians. They were asked to evaluate the ventro-dorsal radiographs according to the FCI system which is the most common system used in Europe to give the final grades (A, B, C, D, E). The grades were converted to numbers and the data were analysed using a one-way ANOVA test. The results showed that only in 20% of the cases, the interobserver agreement was statistically higher in the group of the most experienced observers when compared to the less experienced group of observers. This means that the level of experience does not always lead to a higher agreement. This could be a problem of widespread objective evaluations of CHD. In addition, there are several different systems of evaluation used in various countries. It is necessary to understand the intention of dog owners, who when buying a dog may be planning its first breeding. Therefore, the “correct” or “incorrect” assessment of the CHD radiographs may not always result in the elimination of affected individuals. We do not know exactly the situation of the development of the hip in some breeds, because scrutineers are receiving only “negative radiographs” for evaluation. Many owners are very educated about hip and elbow dysplasia. It is a time to tell the scientific truth.

Keywords

1. Brass, W., 1989: Hip-dysplasia in dogs. J. Small Anim. Pract., 30, 166-170.10.1111/j.1748-5827.1989.tb01525.xSearch in Google Scholar

2. Coopman, F., Verhoeven, G., Saunders, J., Duchateau, L., Van Bree, H., 2008: Prevalence of hip dysplasia, elbow dysplasia and humeral head osteochondrosis in dog breeds in Belgium. Vet. Rec., 163, 654-658.10.1136/vr.163.22.65419043090Search in Google Scholar

3. Flückiger, M., Lang, J., Binder, H., Busato, A., Boos J., 1995: The control of hip dysplasia in Switzerland. A retrospect of the past 24 years. Schweiz. Arch. Tierheilkd., 137, 243-250.Search in Google Scholar

4. Flückiger, M., 2007: Scoring radiographs for Canine Hip Dysplasia - The big tree organisations in the world. Europ. J. Comp. Anim. Pract., 17, 135-140.Search in Google Scholar

5. Fortrie, R., Verhoeven, G., Broeckx, B., Duchateau, L., Janssens, L., Samoy, Y., et al., 2015: Intra- and interobserver agreement on radiographic phenotype in the d iagnosis of Canine Hip Dysplasia. Vet. Surg., 44, 467-473.10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12309.x25414132Search in Google Scholar

6. Swenson, L., Audell, L., Hedhammar, A., 1997: Prevalence and inheritance of and selection for hip dysplasia in seven breeds of dogs in Sweden and benefit: cost analysis of a screening and control program. JAVMA, 210, 207-214.Search in Google Scholar

7. Janutta, V., Hamman, H., Distl, O., 2006: Complex segregation analysis of canine hip dysplasia in German shepherd dogs. J. Hered., 97, 13-20.10.1093/jhered/esi12816267165Search in Google Scholar

8. Keller, G., 2003: The Use of Health Databases and Selective Breeding: A Guide for Dog and Cat Breeders and Owners. 4th edn., Orthopaedic Foundation of Animals Inc., Columbia, MO, USA, 80 pp.Search in Google Scholar

9. Morgan, J. P., Wind, A., Davidson, A. T., 2000: Hip dysplasia. In Hereditary Bone and Joint Diseases in the Dogs. Schlutersche, Hannover, Germany. 131-171.Search in Google Scholar

10. Paster, E. R., Lafond, E., Biery, D. N., Iriye, A., Gregor, T. P., Shofer, F. S., Smith, G. K., 2005: Estimates of prevalence of hip dysplasia in Golden Retrievers and Rottweilers and the influence of bias on published prevalence figures. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 226, 387-392.10.2460/javma.2005.226.38715702688Search in Google Scholar

11. Powers, M. Y., Biery, D. N., Lawler, D. F., Evans, R. H., Shofer, F., Mayhew, P., et al., 2004: Use of the caudolateral curvilinear osteophytes as an early marker for future development of osteoarthritis associated with hip dysplasia in dogs. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 225, 233-237.10.2460/javma.2004.225.23315323379Search in Google Scholar

12. Saunders, J. H., Godefroid, T., Snaps, F. R., Francois, A., Farnir, F., Balligand, M., 1999: Comparison of ventrodorsal and dorsoventral radiographic projections for hip dysplasia diagnosis. Vet. Rec., 145, 109-110.10.1136/vr.145.4.10910461737Search in Google Scholar

13. Schnelle, G. B., 1935: Congenital subluxation of the coxofemoral joint in a dog. Univ. Pennsylv. Bulletin, 15.Search in Google Scholar

14. Smith, G. K., Biery, D. N., Rhodes, W. H., 1996: Between- and within-radiologist accuracy of subjective hip scoring of the ventrodorsal hipextended radiograph (Abstract). In Proc. Int. Symp. Hip Dysplasia and Osteoarthritis in Dogs. Cornell University, New York, USA, 20.Search in Google Scholar

15. Verhoeven, G., Coopman, F., Duchateau, L., Saunders, J. H., Van Russen, B., Van Bree, H., 2007: Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of canine hip dysplasia using the standard ventrodorsal hip-extended radiographic method. JSAP, 48, 387-393.10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00364.x17610468Search in Google Scholar

16. Verhoeven, G., Fortrie, R., Van Ryssen, B., Coopman, F., 2012: Worldwide Screening for Canine Hip Dysplasia: Where Are We Now ? Vet. Surg., 41, 10-19.10.1111/j.1532-950X.2011.00929.x23253035Search in Google Scholar

17. Willis, M. B., 1997: A review of the progress in canine hip dysplasia in Britain. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc., 210, 1480-1482. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo