[Bayram, K., Ganikhodjaev, N. 2013. On pricing futures options on random binomial tree. – Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 435(1), 1–10.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J., Grebner, D. 2009. Forest management and planning. Academic Press, California. 331 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Black, F., Scholes, M. 1973. The Pricing of Options and Corporate Liabilities. – Journal of Political Economy, 8(3), 637–659.10.1086/260062]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Brandão, L.E., Dyer, J.S., Hahn, W.J. 2005. Using binomial decision trees to solve real options valuations problems. – Journal of Decision Analysis, 2(2), 69–88.]Search in Google Scholar
[Broz, D., Rossit, D.A., Rossit, D.G., Cavallin, A. 2018. The Argentinian forest sector: opportunities and challenges in supply chain management. Uncertain Supply Chain Management. (In press).10.5267/j.uscm.2018.1.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Broz, D.R., Woitschach, G.B., Milanesi, G. 2014. Real Options in determining the optimal forest harvesting. (Opções reais na determinação da idade ótima de colheita para dois manejos florestais). – Cerne, 20(1), 89–96. (In Portuguese).10.1590/S0104-77602014000100012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Caprio, G. 2012. The evidence and impact of financial globalization. Academic Press, New York. 781 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chidiak, M., Moreyra, A., Greco, C. 2003. Carbon capture and sustainable forest development in Patagonia Argentina: synergies and challenges. (Captura de carbono y desarrollo forestal sustentable en la Patagonia Argentina: Sinergias y Desafíos). CEPAL, Buenos Aires. 118 pp. (In Spanish).]Search in Google Scholar
[COIFORM. Colegio de Ingenieros Forestales de Misiones, Argentina. 2017. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.coiform.com.ar [Accessed 19 November 2017]. (In Spanish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Colcombet, L., Crechi, E., Keller, A., Pachas, N., Fassola, H., Lacorte, S., Esquivel, J. 2010. Preliminary comparison of financial and economic results of forestry, livestock and silvopastoral projects in Misiones. (Comparación preliminar de resultados financieros y económicos de proyectos forestales, ganaderos y silvopastoriles en Misiones). Acta 14, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria. [WWW document]. – URL http://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta-resultadosfinancieros-economicos.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Spanish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Cox, J., Ross, S., Rubinstein, M. 1979. Option pricing: A simplified approach. – Journal of Financial Economics, 7(3), 229–263.10.1016/0304-405X(79)90015-1]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Duku-Kaakyire, A., Nanang, D.M. 2004. Application of real options theory to forestry investment analysis. – Forest Policy and Economics, 6(6), 539–552.10.1016/S1389-9341(03)00003-0]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Fama, E., French, K. 2004. The capital asset pricing model: Theory and evidence. – Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(3), 25–46.10.1257/0895330042162430]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Feenstra, R.C., Taylor, A.M. 2007. International Macroeconomics. Worth Publishers. 548 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Manley, B. 2013. How does real option value compare with Faustmann value in the context of the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme? – Forest Policy and Economics, 30, 14–22.10.1016/j.forpol.2013.02.001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Markowitz, H. 1991. Portfolio selection: Efficient diversification of investments. John Wiley & Sons, Massachusetts. 400 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Merton, R. 1973. The theory of rational options princing. – The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141–183.10.2307/3003143]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Milanesi, G., Woitschach, G., Broz, D. 2012. Application of the theory of real options to the determination of the optimal time of forest harvest. (Aplicación de la teoría de opciones reales a la determinación del momento óptimo de cosecha forestal). – Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 44, 65–78. (In Portuguese).]Search in Google Scholar
[Monicault, L.A., Delvalle, P. 2009. Economic-financial evaluation of a silvopastoral system (SSP). National Institute of Agricultural Technology. (Evaluación Económico–Financiero de un Sistema Silvopastoril (SSP). Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria). [WWW document]. – URL http://inta.gob.ar/sites/default/files/script-tmp-inta_evaluacin_econmicofinanciero_de_un_sist.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Spanish).]Search in Google Scholar
[Mun, J. 2002. Real options analysis: Tools and techniques for valuing strategic investment and decisions. John Wiley & Sons, Massachusetts. 386 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Olivera, E.B. 2011. Softwares for management and economic analysis of forest plantations. (Softwares para manejo e análise econômica de plantações florestais). Documento 216, Empresa Brasi leira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. [WWW document]. – URL http://www.infoteca.cnptia.embrapa.br/bitstream/doc/898050/1/Doc216.pdf [Accessed 19 March 2016]. (In Portuguese).]Search in Google Scholar
[Peltola, J., Knapp, K.C. 2001. Recursive preferences in forest management. – Forest Science, 47(4), 455–465.]Search in Google Scholar
[Petrasek, S., Perez-Garcia, J.M. 2010. Valuation of timber harvest contracts as American call options with modified least-squares Monte Carlo algorithm. – Forest Science, 56(5), 494–504.]Search in Google Scholar
[Plantinga, A.J. 1998. The optimal timber rotation: An option value approach. – Forest Science, 44(2), 192–202.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rubinstein, M. 1994. Implied Binomial Trees. – Journal of Finance, 49(3), 771–818.10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00079.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Sant’Anna, A.C., Nogueira, J.M. 2010. Economic valuation of environmental services of national forests. (Valoração econômica dos serviços ambientais de florestas nacionais). – Revista de Administração e Negócios da Amazônia, 2(2), 82–108. (In Portuguese).]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, J. 2005. Alternative approach for solving real options problems. – Decision Analysis, 2(2), 89–102.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sun, C., Zhang, D. 2001. Assessing the financial perfor mance of forestry-related investment vehicles: Capital asset pricing model vs. arbitrage pricing theory. – American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3), 617–628.10.1111/0002-9092.00182]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Thomson, T.A. 1992. Optimal forest rotation when stumpage prices follow a diffusion process. – Land Economics, 68(3), 329–342.10.2307/3146380]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Trifonov, Y., Yashin, S., Koshelev, E. 2013. Upgrading corporate equipment as an Asian real option with constant business volatility. – International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(4), 76–89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Trigeorgis, L. 1995. Real options in capital investment: Models, strategies and applications. Praeger Publishers, California. 386 pp.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yao, W, Mei, B. 2015. Assessing forestry-related assets with the intertemporal capital asset pricing model. – Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 192–199.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yemshanov, D., McCarney, G.R., Hauer, G., Luckert (Marty), M.K., Unterschultz, J., McKenney, D.W. 2015. A real options-net present value approach to assessing land use change: A case study of afforestation in Canada. – Forest Policy and Economics, 50, 327–336.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yin, R. 2001. Combining forest-level analysis with options valuation approach – A new framework for assessing forestry investment. – Forest Science, 47(4), 475–483.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yin, R., Newman, D. 1997. When to cut a stand of trees? – Natural Resource Modeling, 10(3), 251–261.]Search in Google Scholar