1. bookVolume 19 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
access type Open Access

Self‐Assessment Quiz Taking Behaviour Analysis in an Online Course

Published Online: 06 Apr 2017
Volume & Issue: Volume 19 (2016) - Issue 2 (December 2016)
Page range: 15 - 31
Journal Details
First Published
11 Dec 2014
Publication timeframe
2 times per year

Self-assessment is vital for online learning since it is one of the most essential skills of distance learners. In this respect, the purpose of this study was to understand learners’ self-assessment quiz taking behaviours in an undergraduate level online course. We tried to figure out whether there is a relation between self-assessment quiz taking behaviours and final exam scores or not. In addition, we investigated how self-assessment quiz taking behaviour differs with respect to learner profile. In line with this purpose, 677 students’ 6092 test events across Project Culture course on Sakai CLE LMS were analyzed. For the analysis of the quantitative data, one-way ANOVA, Chi-Square test of independence, independent-samples t-test and descriptive statistics were utilized. The results revealed that learners who attended self-assessment quizzes regularly had higher final exam scores than others who did not attend those quizzes. Also, they were more satisfied with the course than others study field. In addition, learners who attended selfassessment quizzes regularly had a higher degree of perceived learning. However, number of attempts to those quizzes does not have an effect on final exam scores. On the other hand, a statistically significant relationship was found between attempt number and gender in favour of female learners.


1. Adams, T. L. (1998) Alternative assessment in elementary school mathematics. Childhood Education, 74(4), 220-224.10.1080/00094056.1998.10521938Search in Google Scholar

2. Andrade, H., & Boulay, B. (2003) Gender and the role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21-34.10.1080/00220670309596625Search in Google Scholar

3. Bälter, O., Enström, E., & Klingenberg, B. (2013). The effect of short formative diagnostic web quizzes with minimal feedback. Computers & Education, 60(1), 234-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012. in Google Scholar

4. Belski, I. (2010). The Impact of Self-Assessment and Reflection on Student Learning Outcomes. Proceedings of the 2010 AaeE Conference, Sydney, 216-221. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228460756_The_Impact_of_Self-Assessment_and_Reflection_on_Student_Learning_OutcomesSearch in Google Scholar

5. Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in Continuing Education, 22(2), 151-167. doi: 10.1080/713695728.Search in Google Scholar

6. Boud, D., & Brew, A. (1995). Developing a typology for learner self assessment practices. Research and development in Higher Education, 18, 130-135.Search in Google Scholar

7. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in highereducation: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18(5), 529-549. doi:10.1007/BF00138746Search in Google Scholar

8. Bourke, R. (2010). The chameleonic learner. Learning and self-assessment in context. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.Search in Google Scholar

9. Brown, G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367-393). CA: SAGE.Search in Google Scholar

10. Carter, J., Ala-Mutka, K., Fuller, U., Dick, M., English, J., Fone, W., et al. (2003). How shall we assess this? SIGCSE Bulletin, 35, 107-123.10.1145/960492.960539Search in Google Scholar

11. Claxton, G. (1995). What Kind of Learning does Self-assessment drive? Developing a ‘Nose’ for Quality: Comments on Klenowski. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 2(3), 339-343.Search in Google Scholar

12. Ćukušić, M., Garača, Z., & Jadrićr, M. (2014). Online self-assessment and students’ success in higher education institutions. Computers & Education, 72(2), 100-109.10.1016/j.compedu.2013.10.018Search in Google Scholar

13. Deutsch, T., Herrmann, K., Frese, T., & Sandholzer, H. (2012). Implementing computerbased assessment - a web-based mock examination changes attitudes. Computers & Education, 58, 1068-1075.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.013Search in Google Scholar

14. Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1997) Introduction: assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23(4), 279-298.10.1016/S0191-491X(97)86211-6Search in Google Scholar

15. Falchikov, N. & Boud, D. (1989) Student self-assessment in higher education: a metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 59(4), 395-430.10.3102/00346543059004395Search in Google Scholar

16. Frederiksen, J., & Collins, A. (1989) A systems approach to educational testing. Educational Researcher, 18(9), 27-32.10.3102/0013189X018009027Search in Google Scholar

17. Gagne, R. M., Briggs, L. S., & Wager, W. W. (1988). Principle of Instructional Design. Holt: Rinehart and Winston.Search in Google Scholar

18. Gale, J. (1984). Overview: Self-assessment and Self-remediation Strategies. In E. S. Henderson & M. B. Henderson (Eds.), Independent Learning in Higher Education. NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Search in Google Scholar

19. Garcia, J. A., & Floyd, C. E. (1999) Using single system design for student self-assessment: a method for enhancing practice and integrating curriculum. Journal of Social Work Education, 35(3), 451-461.10.1080/10437797.1999.10778981Search in Google Scholar

20. Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333-2351. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004Search in Google Scholar

21. Goodrich, H. (1996). Student self-assessment: at the intersection of metacognition and authentic assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University.Search in Google Scholar

22. Gretes, J. A., & Green, M. (2000). Improving undergraduate learning with computer-assisted assessment. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33(1), 46-54.10.1080/08886504.2000.10782299Search in Google Scholar

23. Heidi A., & Du, Y. (2007) Student responses to criteria-referenced self-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 159-181, doi:10.1080/02602930600801928Search in Google Scholar

24. Hanrahan, S. J., & Isaacs, G. (2001) Assessing self- and peer-assessment: the students’ views. Higher Educational Research and Development, 20(1), 53-70.10.1080/07294360123776Search in Google Scholar

25. Horner, S., & Shwery, C. (2002) Becoming an engaged, self-regulated reader. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 102-109. 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_6Search in Google Scholar

26. Ibabe, I., & Jauregizar, J. (2009). Online self-assessment with feedback and metacognitive knowledge. Higher Education, 59, 243-258.10.1007/s10734-009-9245-6Search in Google Scholar

27. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C.-L., & Bangert, R. L. (1984). Effects of practice on aptitude and achievement test scores. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 435-447.10.3102/00028312021002435Search in Google Scholar

28. Laurillard, D. (1993). Rethinking University Teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology. NY: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

29. McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational HORIZONS, 87(1), 40-49.Search in Google Scholar

30. Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2016). The impact of paper-based, computer-based and mobile-based self-assessment on students’ science motivation and achievement. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1241-1248. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.09.025Search in Google Scholar

31. Oscarson, M. (Ed.). (1978). Approaches to self assessment in foreign language learning. London: Pergamon Press.Search in Google Scholar

32. Oscarson, M. (1989). Self-assessment of language proficiency: Rationale and applications. Language Testing, 6(1), 1-13. doi:10.1177/026553228900600103Search in Google Scholar

33. Panadero, E. (2011). Instructional help for self-assessment and self-regulation: Evaluation of the efficacy of self-assessment scripts vs. rubrics. Ph.D. dissertation. Spain: Department of Educational and Developmental psychology, Universidad Autönoma de Madrid.Search in Google Scholar

34. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2013). Self-assessment: Theoretical and Practical Connotations. When it Happens, How is it Acquired and what to do to Develop it. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 551-576. doi:10.14204/ejrep.30.12200Search in Google Scholar

35. Paris, S. G., & Paris, A. H. (2001) Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36(2), 89-101.10.1207/S15326985EP3602_4Search in Google Scholar

36. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications (2nd ed.). N.J.: Merrill/Prentice Hall.Search in Google Scholar

37. Rolheiser, C., & Ross, J. A. (2013). Student Self-Evaluation: What Research Says and What Practice Shows. Retrieved from http://moodle.manistee.org/pluginfile.php/59439/course/section/16807/ STUDENT SELF-EVALUATION WHAT RESEARCH SAYS AND WHAT PRACTICE SHOWS.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

38. Rowntree, D. (1991). Teaching Through Self-instruction: How to Develop Open Learning Materials. NY: Nichols Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

39. Schunk, D. H. (2004). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. N.J.: Merrill Prentice/Hall.Search in Google Scholar

40. Saujani, R. (2016, February). Teach girls bravery, not perfection. [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.ted.com/talks/reshma_saujani_teach_girls_bravery_not_perfection#t-6027Search in Google Scholar

41. Snooks, M. K. (2004). Using practice tests on a regular basis to improve student learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 100, 109-113.10.1002/tl.178Search in Google Scholar

42. Stiggins, R. J. (2001). Student-involved classroom assessment (3rd ed.). NJ: Merrill/Prentice-Hall.Search in Google Scholar

43. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Search in Google Scholar

44. Taylor, J. A. (1998). Self Test: a flexible self assessment package for distance and other learners. Computers & Education, 31(3), 319-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00044-X10.1016/S0360-1315(98)00044-XSearch in Google Scholar

45. Taras, M. (2005). Assessment - summative and formative - some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 466-478.10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00307.xSearch in Google Scholar

46. Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Search in Google Scholar

47. Wilson, K., Boyd, C., Chen, L., & Jamal, S. (2011). Improving student performance in a first year geography course: examining the importance of computer-assisted formative assessment. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1493-1500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011. in Google Scholar

48. Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr. J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47, 75-79.10.1145/986213.986216Search in Google Scholar

49. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237065878_Becoming_a_Self-Regulated_Learner_An_Overview 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo