[Allen, Keith. 2014. Hallucination and imagination. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 93(2): 287-302.10.1080/00048402.2014.984312]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernstein, Sara. 2016. Grounding is not causation. Philosophical Perspectives 30(1): 21-38.10.1111/phpe.12074]Search in Google Scholar
[Campbell, John. 2002. Reference and Consciousness. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199243816.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Céspedes, Esteban. 2016. Causal Overdetermination and Contextualism. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-33801-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Chalmers, David J. 2006. Perception and the fall from Eden. In Perceptual Experience, ed. by Tamar S. Gendler and John Hawthorne, 49-125. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Conduct, M. D. 2011. Naïve realism and extreme disjunctivism. Philosophical Explorations 13(3): 201-221.10.1080/13869795.2010.501900]Search in Google Scholar
[Conduct, M. D. 2012. Naïve realism without disjunctivism about experience. Consciousness and Cognition 21(2): 727-736.10.1016/j.concog.2011.02.009]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Dokic, Jérôme, and Martin, Jean-Rémy. 2012. Disjunctivism, hallucination and metacognition. WIREs Cognitive Science 3: 533-543.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dokic, Jérôme. and Martin, Jean-Rémy. 2017. Felt reality and the opacity of perception. Topoi 36(2): 299-309.10.1007/s11245-015-9327-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Dowe, Phil. 2008. Causal processes. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by Edward N. Zalta, Fall 2008. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/causation-process/.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fish, William. 2008. Disjunctivism, indistinguishability, and the nature of hallucination. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, ed. by Adrian Haddock and Fiona Macpherson. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0006]Search in Google Scholar
[Fish, William. 2009. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195381344.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Fish, William. 2013. Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion: reply to my critics. Philosophical Studies 163(1): 57-66.10.1007/s11098-012-0072-8]Search in Google Scholar
[French, Craig. 2014. Naive realist perspectives on seeing blurrily. Ratio 27(4): 393-413.10.1111/rati.12079]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Ganis, Giorgio; Thompson, William L.; and Kosslyn, Stephen M. 2004. Brain areas underlying visual mental imagery and visual perception: an fMRI study. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research 20(2): 226-241.10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.02.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Hellie, Benj. 2013. The multidisjunctive conception of hallucination. In Hallucination, ed. by Fiona Mapherson. Cambridge: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262019200.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnston, Mark. 2004. The obscure object of hallucination. Philosophical Studies 120(1-3): 113-183.10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033753.64202.21]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnston, Mark. 2006. Better than mere knowledge? The function of sensory awareness. In Perceptual Experience, ed. by T. S. Gendler and John Hawthorne. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199289769.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Johnston, Mark. 2011. On a neglected epistemic virtue. Philosophical Issues 21(1): 165-218.10.1111/j.1533-6077.2011.00201.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kennedy, Matthew. 2009. Heirs of nothing: the implications of transparency. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 79(3): 574-604.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2009.00294.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Logue, Heather. 2010. Getting acquainted with naïve realism: critical notice of Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion. Philosophical Books 51(1): 22-38.10.1111/j.1468-0149.2010.00499.x]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Logue, Heather. 2012a. What should the naïve realist say about total hallucinations? Philosophical Perspectives 26(1): 173-199.10.1111/phpe.12012]Search in Google Scholar
[Logue, Heather. 2012b. Why naive realism? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112(2pt2): 211-237.10.1111/j.1467-9264.2012.00332.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, Michael G. F. 2002. The transparency of experience. Mind and Language 4(4): 376-425.10.1111/1468-0017.00205]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Martin, Michael G. F. 2004. The limits of self-awareness. Philosophical Studies 120(1-3): 37-89.10.1023/B:PHIL.0000033751.66949.97]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, Michael G. F. 2006. On being alienated. In Perceptual Experience, ed. by Tamar S. Gendler and John Hawthorne. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin, Michael G. F. 2013. Shibboleth: some comments on William Fish’s Perception, Hallucination and Illusion. Philosophical Studies 163(1): 37-48.10.1007/s11098-012-0075-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Nanay, Bence. 2016. Hallucination as mental imagery. Journal of Consciousness Studies 23(7-8): 65-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niikawa, Takuya. 2016. Naïve realism and the explanatory role of visual phenomenology [Special Issue]. Argumenta-Journal of Analytic Philosophy 1(2): 219-231.]Search in Google Scholar
[Palmer, Stephen E. 1999. Vision Science: Photons to Phenomenology. 1st edition. Cambridge: The MIT Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pautz, Adam. 2010. Why explain visual experience in terms of content? In Perceiving the World, ed. by Bence Nanay. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195386196.003.0010]Search in Google Scholar
[Pautz, Adam . 2013. Do the benefits of naïve realism outweigh the costs? Comments on Fish, Perception, Hallucination and Illusion. Philosophical Studies 163(1): 25-36.10.1007/s11098-012-0080-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Raleigh, Thomas. 2011. Visual experience and demonstrative thought. Disputatio 4(30): 69-91.10.2478/disp-2011-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Ratcliffe, Matthew. 2009. Belonging to the world through the feeling body. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 16(2): 205-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reiss, Julian. 2013. Contextualising causation part II. Philosophy Compass 8(11): 1076-1090.10.1111/phc3.12073]Search in Google Scholar
[Silins, Nicholas. 2012. Judgment as a guide to belief. In Introspection and Consciousness, ed.by Declan Smithies and Daniel Stoljar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.003.0011]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, A. D. 2008. Disjunctivism and discriminability. In Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge, ed. by Adrian Haddock and Fiona Macpherson, 181-204. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199231546.003.0008]Search in Google Scholar
[Smithies, Declan. 2012. A simple theory of introspection. In Introspection and Consciousness, ed. by Declan Smithies and Daniel Stoljar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[Soteriou, Matthew. 2016. Disjunctivism. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9781315636832]Search in Google Scholar
[Zimmerman, Aaron. 2012. Introspection, explanation, and perceptual experience: resisting metaphysical. In Introspection and Consciousness, ed. by Declan Smithies and Daniel Stoljar. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199744794.003.0013]Search in Google Scholar