1. bookVolume 5 (2018): Issue 2 (December 2018)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Creativity’s Need for Relevance in Research and Real Life: Let’s Set a New Agenda for Positive Outcomes

Published Online: 03 Jan 2019
Volume & Issue: Volume 5 (2018) - Issue 2 (December 2018)
Page range: 124 - 137
Received: 08 Jul 2018
Accepted: 30 Aug 2018
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Despite an ongoing surge of interest in creativity (both in academia and the public eye), it is essential that researchers focus on why creativity matters. Studies that empathize variables that help increase creativity are absolutely valuable, but I argue that need more work on how creativity can lead to positive outcomes. Much of the existing literature examines how creativity can improve school or work performance – which it does. Yet when these studies are compared with similar ones on conscientiousness, it is hard to argue that increasing creativity is the best way to succeed in school or work (at least using traditional metrics). I argue that as a field, we need to expand our ideas about how creativity can be beneficial. I end with an open call for suggestions.

Keywords

Adobe (2016). State of Create. Retrieved from /http://www.adobe.com/content/dam/acom/en/max/pdfs/AdobeStateofCreate_2016_Report_Final.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Aleksić, D., Černe, M., Dysvik, A., & Škerlavaj, M. (2016). I want to be creative, but … preference for creativity, perceived clear outcome goals, work enjoyment, and creative performance. European Journal Of Work And Organizational Psychology, 25, 363-383.10.1080/1359432X.2015.1077809Search in Google Scholar

Aljughaiman, A., & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 17-34.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2005.tb01247.xSearch in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Schatzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 5-32.10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003Search in Google Scholar

Adarves-Yorno, I., Haslam, S. A, & Postmes, T. (2008). And now for something completely different? The impact of group membership on perceptions of creativity. Social Influence, 3, 248-266.10.1080/15534510802341124Search in Google Scholar

Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2007). Creative innovation or crazy irrelevance? The contribution of group norms and social identity to creative behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 410-416.10.1016/j.jesp.2006.02.013Search in Google Scholar

Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Schimel, J. (1999). Creativity and terror management: The effects of creative activity on guilt and social projection following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 19-32.10.1037/0022-3514.77.1.19Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. Journal Of Creative Behavior, 46, 16-29.10.1002/jocb.002Search in Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2014). Teaching for creativity in the common core classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Search in Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A., Kaufman, J. C., & Baxter, J. (2011). Answering the unexpected questions: Exploring the relationship between students' creative self-efficacy and teacher ratings of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 342-349.10.1037/a0022834Search in Google Scholar

Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., Telander, K., & Tramayne, S. (2011). Social cognitive career theory, conscientiousness, and work performance: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 81-90.10.1016/j.jvb.2010.11.009Search in Google Scholar

Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 809-830.10.1037/a0027652Search in Google Scholar

Carter, N. T., Guan, L., Maples, J. L., Williamson, R. L., & Miller, J. D. (2016). The downsides of extreme conscientiousness for psychological well-being: The role of obsessive compulsive tendencies. Journal of Personality, 84, 510-522.10.1111/jopy.12177Search in Google Scholar

Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Reyes, J. S., Salanga, M. C., Miramontes, L. A., & Adams, N. B. (2008). Prediction and cross-situational consistency of daily behavior across cultures: Testing trait and cultural psychology perspectives. Journal of Research in Personality, 42, 1199-1215.10.1016/j.jrp.2008.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Cropley, A. J. (1992). More ways than one: Fostering creativity. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., & Cropley, A. J. (2008). Malevolent creativity: A functional model of creativity in terrorism and crime. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 105-115.10.1080/10400410802059424Search in Google Scholar

Cropley, D. H., Kaufman, J. C., White, A.E., & Chiera, B. A. (2014). Layperson perceptions of malevolent creativity: The good, the bad, and the ambiguous. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 400-412.10.1037/a0037792Search in Google Scholar

DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Cybernetic Big Five theory. Journal of Research in Personality, 56, 33-58.10.1016/j.jrp.2014.07.004Search in Google Scholar

Dunning, D., Johnson, K., Ehrlinger, J., & Kruger, J. (2003). Why people fail to recognize their own incompetence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 83-86.10.1111/1467-8721.01235Search in Google Scholar

Eidelman, S. & Crandall, C. S. (2012). Bias in favor of the status quo. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6, 270-281.10.1111/j.1751-9004.2012.00427.xSearch in Google Scholar

Eidelman, S., Crandall, C.S., & Pattershall, J. (2009). The existence bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 765-775.10.1037/a0017058Search in Google Scholar

Eidelman, S., Pattershall, J., & Crandall, C. S. (2010). Longer is better. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 993-998.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.07.008Search in Google Scholar

Eschleman, K.J., Madsen, J., Alarcon, G. M., & Barelka, A. (2014). Benefiting from creative activity: The positive relationships between creative activity, recovery experiences, and performance-related outcomes. Journal Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87, 579-598.10.1111/joop.12064Search in Google Scholar

Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (Eds.) (2017). Cambridge handbook of creativity and personality research. New York: Cambridge University Press. Florida, R. (2014). The rise of the creative class – revisited: Revised and expanded. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar

Forgeard, M. J. C., & Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Who cares about imagination, creativity, and innovation, and why? A review. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 250-269.10.1037/aca0000042Search in Google Scholar

Freund, P. A., & Holling, H. (2008). Creativity in the classroom: A multilevel analysis investigating the impact of creativity and reasoning ability on GPA. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 309-318.10.1080/10400410802278776Search in Google Scholar

Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., & Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109, 269-299.10.1037/edu0000133Search in Google Scholar

Goncalo, J. A., Vincent, L. C., & Krause, V. (2015). The liberating consequences of creative work: How a creative outlet lifts the physical burden of secrecy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 59, 32-39.10.1016/j.jesp.2015.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., Diffley, R., Goodyear, J., Shanahan, E., & Sternberg, R. J. (2009). Are SATS and GPA enough? A theory-based approach to predicting academic success in secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 964-981.10.1037/a0015906Search in Google Scholar

Haslam, N. (2011). The return of the anal character. Review of General Psychology, 15, 351-360.10.1037/a0025251Search in Google Scholar

Haslam, S. A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17, 384-401.10.1177/1088868313498001Search in Google Scholar

Heidenreich, S., & Spieth, P. (2013). Why innovations fail - The case of passive and active innovation resistance. International Journal of Innovation Management, 17, 1-42.10.1142/S1363919613500217Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B.A. (2010). Intrinsic motivation and creativity in the classroom: Have we come full circle? In R. A. Beghetto & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), Nurturing creativity in the classroom (pp. 329-361). New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, D., & Salvendy, G. (2009). Measuring consumer perception of product creativity: Impact on satisfaction and purchasability. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 19, 223-240.10.1002/hfm.20150Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2015). Volitional personality trait change: Can people choose to change their personality traits? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 490-507.10.1037/pspp0000021Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, N. W., & Fraley, R. C. (2016). Changing for the better? Longitudinal associations between volitional personality change and psychological well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 603-615.10.1177/0146167216637840Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, N. W., & Roberts, B. W. (2014). Goals to change personality traits: Concurrent links between personality traits, daily behavior, and goals to change oneself. Journal of Research in Personality, 53, 68-83.10.1016/j.jrp.2014.08.008Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, N. W., & Roberts, B. W. (2016). Social investment in work reliably predicts change in conscientiousness and agreeableness: A direct replication and extension of Hudson, Roberts, and Lodi-Smith (2012). Journal of Research in Personality, 60, 12-23.10.1016/j.jrp.2015.09.004Search in Google Scholar

Hudson, N. W., Roberts, B. W., & Lodi-Smith, J. (2012). Personality trait development and social investment in work. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 334-344.10.1016/j.jrp.2012.03.002Search in Google Scholar

IBM. (2010). IBM 2010 Global CEO Study: Creativity selected as most crucial factor for future success [press release]. Retrieved from https://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/31670.wssSearch in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2010). Are creative students really welcome in the classroom? Implicit theories of “good” and “creative” student’ personality among Polish teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences Journal, 2, 1233-1237.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.179Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2011). It doesn’t hurt to ask... But sometimes it hurts to believe. Predictors of Polish students’ creative self-efficacy. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 5, 154-164.10.1037/a0021427Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (Ed.) (2014). Creativity and mental illness. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139128902Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., Czerwonka, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (in press). Does intelligence strengthen creative metacognition? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts.Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2015). Why creativity isn’t in IQ tests, why it matters, and why it won’t change anytime soon…. Probably. Journal of Intelligence 3, 59-72.10.3390/jintelligence3030059Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C. (2016). Creativity 101 (2nd Ed). New York: Springer.10.1891/9780826129536Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Agars, M. D. (2009). Being creative with the predictors and criteria for success. American Psychologist, 64, 280-281.10.1037/a0014926Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2002). Could Steven Spielberg manage the Yankees?: Creative thinking in different domains. Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 12, 5-15.Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2006). Intelligent testing with Torrance. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 99-102.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_11Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2013). In praise of Clark Kent: Creative metacognition and the importance of teaching kids when (not) to be creative. Roeper Review, 35, 155-165.10.1080/02783193.2013.799413Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Beghetto, R A., & Watson, C. (2016). Creative metacognition and self-ratings of creative performance: A 4-C perspective. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 394-399.10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.004Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Bromley, M. L., & Cole, J. C. (2006). Insane, poetic, lovable: Creativity and endorsement of the “Mad Genius” stereotype. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality, 26, 149-161.10.2190/J207-3U30-R401-446JSearch in Google Scholar

Kim, K. H. (2006). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57-66.10.4219/jsge-2005-473Search in Google Scholar

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121-1134.10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121Search in Google Scholar

Kuncel, N. R., Ones, D. S., & Sackett, P. R. (2010). Individual differences as predictors of work, educational, and broad life outcomes. Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 331-33610.1016/j.paid.2010.03.042Search in Google Scholar

Kyllonen, P. C., Walters, A. M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Noncognitive constructs and their assessment in graduate education. Educational Assessment, 10, 153-184.10.1207/s15326977ea1003_2Search in Google Scholar

Laukkanen, T., Sinkkonen, S., Kivijärvi, M. & Laukkanen, P. (2007). Innovation resistance among mature consumers. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24, 419-427.10.1108/07363760710834834Search in Google Scholar

Lee, K., Rho, S., Kim, S., & Jun, G. J. (2007). Creativity-innovation cycle for organizational exploration and exploitation: Lessons from Neowiz - A Korean Internet company. Long Range Planning: International Journal of Strategic Management, 40, 505-523.10.1016/j.lrp.2007.06.009Search in Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, J., Woock, C., & Wright, M. (2008). Ready to innovate: Are educators and executives aligned on the creative readiness of the U.S. (Conference Board Research Report No. R-1424-08-RR). New York: The Conference Board.Search in Google Scholar

Licuanan, B. F., Dailey, L. R., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Idea evaluation: Error in evaluating highly original ideas. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41, 1-27.10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01279.xSearch in Google Scholar

Long, H., Plucker, J. A., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Research productivity and performance of journals in creativity sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 353-360.10.1080/10400419.2014.929425Search in Google Scholar

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2008). The five-factor theory of personality. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (3rd ed., pp. 150–181). New York: Guilford Press.Search in Google Scholar

Madjar, N., Greenberg, E., & Chen, Z. (2011). Factors for radical creativity, incremental creativity, and routine, noncreative performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 730-743.10.1037/a0022416Search in Google Scholar

Martin-Rios, C., & Parga-Dans, E. (2016). The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese: Non-technological innovation in creative industries. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25, 6-1710.1111/caim.12131Search in Google Scholar

Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the Big Five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 90-10610.1037/0022-3514.89.1.90Search in Google Scholar

Metzl, E. S. (2009). The role of creative thinking in resilience after hurricane Katrina. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3, 112-123.10.1037/a0013479Search in Google Scholar

Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175-199.10.1002/job.237Search in Google Scholar

Miron-Spektor, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 740-760.10.5465/amj.2011.64870100Search in Google Scholar

Mueller, J. S., Goncalo, J. A., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Recognizing creative leadership: Can creative idea expression negatively relate to perceptions of leadership potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 494-498.10.1016/j.jesp.2010.11.010Search in Google Scholar

Mueller, J. S., Melwani, S., & Goncalo, J. A. (2012). The bias against creativity: Why people desire but reject creative ideas. Psychological Science, 23, 13-17.10.1177/0956797611421018Search in Google Scholar

Mullet, D. R., Willerson, A., Lamb, K. N., & Kettler, T. (2016). Examining teacher perceptions of creativity: A systematic review of the literature. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 21, 9-30.10.1016/j.tsc.2016.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Nicol, J. J., & Long, B. C. (1996). Creativity and perceived stress of female music therapists and hobbyists. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 1-10.10.1207/s15326934crj0901_1Search in Google Scholar

Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322–338.10.1037/a0014996Search in Google Scholar

Poropat, A. E. (2014). A meta-analysis of adult-rated child personality and academic performance in primary education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 239-252.10.1111/bjep.12019Search in Google Scholar

Pretz, J. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). Do traditional admissions criteria reflect applicant creativity? Journal of Creative Behavior, 51, 240-251.10.1002/jocb.120Search in Google Scholar

Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227-23610.1037/a0035597Search in Google Scholar

Priest, T. (2006). Self-evaluation, creativity, and musical achievement. Psychology of Music, 34, 47-61.10.1177/0305735606059104Search in Google Scholar

Ram, S., & Sheth, J. N. (1989). Consumer resistance to innovations: the marketing problem and its solutions. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 6, 5-14.10.1108/EUM0000000002542Search in Google Scholar

Roberts, B. W., Luo, J., Briley, D. A., Chow, P. I., Su, R., & Hill, P. L. (2017). A systematic review of personality trait change through intervention. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 117-141.10.1037/bul0000088Search in Google Scholar

Schieman, S., & Young, M. (2010). The demands of creative work: Implications for stress in the work-family interface. Social Science Research, 39, 246-259.10.1016/j.ssresearch.2009.05.008Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 262-274.10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (2012). Development of rationale and measures of noncognitive college student potential. Educational Psychologist, 47, 18-29.10.1080/00461520.2011.610680Search in Google Scholar

Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361-388.10.1080/10400410409534549Search in Google Scholar

Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel Psychology, 54, 845-874.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00234.xSearch in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York: Free Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., Pretz, J. E., & Kaufman, J. C. (2003). Types of innovations. In L. Shavinina (Ed.), The international handbook of innovation (pp. 158-169). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Search in Google Scholar

Tadmor, C. T., Satterstrom, P., Jang, S., & Polzer, J. T. (2012). Beyond individual creativity: The superadditive benefits of multicultural experience for collective creativity in culturally diverse teams. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43, 384-392.10.1177/0022022111435259Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1963). Education and the creative potential. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vock, M., Preckel, F., & Holling, H. (2011). Mental abilities and school achievement: A test of a mediation hypothesis. Intelligence, 39, 357-369.10.1016/j.intell.2011.06.006Search in Google Scholar

Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive Psychology, 27, 1-40.10.1006/cogp.1994.1010Search in Google Scholar

Ward, T. B., Dodds, R. A., Saunders, K. N., & Sifonis, C. M. (2000). Attribute centrality and imaginative thought. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1387–1397.10.3758/BF03211839Search in Google Scholar

Ward, T. B., & Sifonis, C. M. (1997). Task demands and generative thinking: What changes and what remains the same? Journal of Creative Behavior, 31, 245-259.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1997.tb00797.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wortman, J., Lucas, R. E., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Stability and change in the Big Five personality domains: Evidence from a longitudinal study of Australians. Psychology and Aging, 27, 867-874.10.1037/a0029322Search in Google Scholar

Yap, C., Chai, K., & Lemaire, P. (2005). An empirical study on functional diversity and innovation in SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 176–190.10.1111/j.1476-8691.2005.00338.xSearch in Google Scholar

Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current directions in psychological science, 10, 224-228.10.1111/1467-8721.00154Search in Google Scholar

Zell, E., & Krizan, Z. (2014). Do people have insight into their abilities? A metasynthesis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 111–125.10.1177/1745691613518075Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo