1. bookVolume 3 (2016): Issue 1 (June 2016)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Which Test of Divergent Thinking Is Best?

Published Online: 08 Jun 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 3 (2016) - Issue 1 (June 2016)
Page range: 4 - 18
Received: 22 Nov 2015
Accepted: 18 Feb 2016
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Divergent thinking (DT) tests are probably the most commonly used measures of creative potential. Several extensive batteries are available but most research relies on one or two specific tests rather than a complete battery. This may limit generalizations because tests of DT are not equivalent. They are not always highly inter-correlated. Additionally, some DT tests appear to be better than others at eliciting originality. This is critical because originality is vital for creativity. The primary purpose of the present study was to determine which test of DT elicits the most originality. Seven measures of DTwere administered on a sample of 611 participants in eight Arabic countries. The tests were Figural, Titles, Realistic Presented Problems, Realistic Problem Generation, Instances, Uses, and Similarities. The Quick Test of Convergent Thinking, Runco’s Ideational Behavior Scale, and a demographic questionnaire were also administered. A linear mixed model analysis confirmed that the originality scores in the DT tests differed by test. Post-hoc tests indicated that the Titles and Realistic Problem Generation tests produced the highest mean originality scores, whereas the Realistic Presented Problems test produced the lowest mean originality scores. These differences confirm that research using only one DT test will not provide generalizable results.

Keywords

Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 229-238.10.1080/10400419.2014.901095Search in Google Scholar

Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, And The Arts, 9, 41-53.10.1037/a0038501Search in Google Scholar

Alotaiby, F., Foda, S., & Alkharashi, I. (2014). Arabic vs. English: Comparative statistical study. Arabian Journal for Science & Engineering (Springer Science & Business Media B.V.), 39, 809-820.Search in Google Scholar

Ames, M., & Runco, M. A. (2005). Predicting entrepreneurship from ideation and divergent thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14, 311-315.10.1111/j.1467-8691.2004.00349.xSearch in Google Scholar

Anastasi, A. (1988). Explorations in human intelligence: Some uncharted routes. Applied Measurement In Education, 1, 207-213.10.1207/s15324818ame0103_2Search in Google Scholar

Beketayev, K., & Runco, M. A. (in press). Semantics-based algorithmic method for assessing divergent thinking. Europe's Journal of Psychology.Search in Google Scholar

Chand O’Neal, I., Paek, S. H., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Comparison of competing theories about ideation and creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications. 2(2), 145-165.10.1515/ctra-2015-0018Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Search in Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1989). Construct validation after thirty years. In R. L. Linn, R. L. Linn (Eds.), Intelligence: Measurement, theory, and public policy: Proceedings of a symposium in honor of Lloyd G. Humphreys (pp. 147-171). Champaign, IL, US: University of Illinois Press.Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Getzels, J. W. (1988). Creativity and problem finding. In F. G. Farley & R. W. Neperole (Eds.), The foundations of aesthetics, art, and art education (pp. 91–106). New York: Praeger.Search in Google Scholar

Guilford, J. P. (1968). Creativity, intelligence, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: EDITS/Knapp.Search in Google Scholar

Harrington, D. M. (1975). Effects of explicit instructions to 'be creative' on the psychological meaning of divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Personality, 43, 434-454.10.1111/j.1467-6494.1975.tb00715.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hocevar, D. (1979). Ideational fluency as a confounding factor in the measurement of originality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 191-196.10.1037/0022-0663.71.2.191Search in Google Scholar

Khaleefa, O. H., Erdos, G., & Ashria, I. H. (1996). Gender and creativity in an Afro-Arab Islamic culture: The case of Sudan. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 52-60.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00757.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. V., & Samadpour Motalleebi, S. N. (2008). The Impact of culture on the creative potential of American, Russian, and Iranian college students. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 404-411.10.1080/10400410802391835Search in Google Scholar

Kirk, R. E. (1996). Practical significance: A concept whose time has come. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 746–759.10.1177/0013164496056005002Search in Google Scholar

Milgram, R. M. (1990). Creativity: An idea whose time has come and gone? In M. A. Runco & R. S. Albert (Eds.), Theories of creativity (pp. 215–233). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Mumford M. D, Reiter-Palmon R, & Redmond M. R. (1994). Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. In: Runco M (ed.) Problem finding, problem solving, and creativity, pp. 3–39. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Okuda, S. M., Runco, M. A., & Berger, D. E. (1991). Creativity and the finding and solving of real-world problems. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 9, 45-53.10.1177/073428299100900104Search in Google Scholar

Plucker, J., Runco, M., & Lim, W. (2006). Predicting ideational behavior from divergent thinking and discretionary time on task. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 55-63.10.1207/s15326934crj1801_7Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (1991). Divergent thinking. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2008). Creativity and education. New Horizons in Education, 56, 107-115.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (Ed.). (2013). Divergent thinking and creative potential. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., &Acar, S. (2010). Do tests of divergent thinking have an experiential bias? Psychology of Art, Creativity, and Aesthetics, 4, 144-148.10.1037/a0018969Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (1985). The reliability and validity of ideational originality in the divergent thinking of academically gifted and nongifted children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 483-501.10.1177/001316448504500306Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Dow, G., & Smith, W. R. (2006). Information, experience, divergent thinking: An empirical test. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 269-277.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_4Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Illies, J. J., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (2005). Explicit instructions to be creative and original: A comparison of strategies and criteria as targets with three types of divergent thinking tests. Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 15, 5-15.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Okuda, S. M. (1988). Problem discovery, divergent thinking, and the creative process. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17, 211-20.10.1007/BF01538162Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Plucker, J. A., & Lim, W. (2000-2001). Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 393-400.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1334_16Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., Okuda, S. M., & Thurston, B. J. (1991). Environmental cues and divergent thinking. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Divergent thinking (pp. 79-85). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Search in Google Scholar

Torrance E. P. (1972) Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114–143.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00923.xSearch in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.10.1037/13134-000Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly? Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, M. A., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Xu, R. (2003). Measuring explained variation in linear mixed effects models. Statistics in medicine, 22, 3527-3541.10.1002/sim.1572Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo