1. bookVolume 2 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

The Status of the Social in Creativity Studies and the Pitfalls of Dichotomic Thinking*

Published Online: 26 May 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 2 (2015) - Issue 1 (June 2015)
Page range: 102 - 119
Received: 04 Feb 2015
Accepted: 14 Feb 2015
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Creativity studies seem to be a stronghold for individual-based psychological theories. The reasons for this are numerous and complex and, among them, we can identify certain limited or counter-productive ways of conceptualising the social. In this reply to comments I address both the status of the social in creativity studies and the dichotomies that follow from adopting an external view of society and culture. Among them, the separation between creative potential and achievement is particularly problematic, as it constructs a reified, static, and individual notion of potential, reflected in the measurement of divergent thinking. I propose, towards the end, a perspectival model of creativity that radically socialises divergent thinking by placing the social at the core rather than the periphery of creative production. Finally, I suggest that including time into our theory and research holds the key to overcoming many of the false dichotomies that underline creativity studies, at least in psychology. A thoroughly social perspective on creativity might seem like a daring or foolish endeavour but it is, in my view, also the most promising.

Keywords

Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Trans. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin and London: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Brown, V. R., & Paulus, P. B. (2002). Making group brainstorming more effective: Recommendations from an associative memory perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 208-212.10.1111/1467-8721.00202Search in Google Scholar

Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-KonsultitOy.Search in Google Scholar

Farr, R. M. (1983). Wilhelm Wundt (1832-1920) and the origins of psychology as an experimental and social science. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 4, 289-301.10.1111/j.2044-8309.1983.tb00596.xSearch in Google Scholar

Citko, K. (2015). “ And what is a beautiful poem” ? Reflections of a poet on Vlad Petre Glăveanu’s ‘The psychology of creativity: A critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 97-101; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0015.10.1515/ctra-2015-0015Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1998). Creativity and genius: A systems perspective. In A. Steptoe (Ed.) Genius and the mind: Studies of creativity and temperament (pp. 39-66). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Galton, F. (1874). English men of science: Their nature and nurture. London: MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2006a). Becoming other: From social interaction to self-reflection. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, A. (2006b). Games and the development of perspective taking. Human Development, 49, 87-92.10.1159/000091334Search in Google Scholar

Gillespie, A., & Martin, J. (2014). Position exchange theory: A socio-material basis for discursive and psychological positioning. New Ideas in Psychology, 32, 73-79.10.1016/j.newideapsych.2013.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2011). Creativity as cultural participation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 41, 1, 48-67.10.1111/j.1468-5914.2010.00445.xSearch in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). From dichotomous to relational thinking in the psychology of creativity: A review of great debates. Creativity and Leisure: An intercultural and crossdisciplinary journal, 1, 2, 83-96.Search in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (forthcoming). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior.Search in Google Scholar

Gralewski, J. (2015). The Psychology of Creativity: A Discussion Between Creative Potential and Its Realization. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 49-55; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0007.10.1515/ctra-2015-0007Search in Google Scholar

Graumann, C. F. (1986). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual: Floyd H. Allport’s contribution to social psychology. In C. F. Graumann & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Changing conceptions of crowd mind and behavior (pp. 97-116). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar

Harré, H. R., & van Langenhove, L. (Eds.) (1998). Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B. A. (2015). Comment on “ The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading” by Vlad Petre Glăveanu. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 32-37; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0004.10.1515/ctra-2015-0004Search in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Consensual assessment. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity, Vol. 1 (pp. 346–359). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The Dialogical Self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture Psychology, 7, 243-281.10.1177/1354067X0173001Search in Google Scholar

Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 147-160.10.1177/0959354302122001Search in Google Scholar

Hoff, E., & Carlsson, I. (2015). She, You and They – More actors on the creativity research stage! Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 38-43; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0005.10.1515/ctra-2015-0005Search in Google Scholar

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Search in Google Scholar

Hui, A. N. N. (2015). Commentary on ‘The psychology of creativity: A critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 56-63; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0008.10.1515/ctra-2015-0008Search in Google Scholar

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Jovchelovitch, S. (2007). Knowledge in context: Representations, community and culture. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203968895Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M. (2015). Notes on Creative Potential and Its Measurement. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 4-16; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0001.10.1515/ctra-2015-0001Search in Google Scholar

Knopf, A. A. (1924). Principles of psychology. New York, NY: Kantor, J. R.Search in Google Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. (2015). The Big Question in creativity research: The transcendental source of creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 90-96; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0014.10.1515/ctra-2015-0014Search in Google Scholar

Lohman, D. F., & Lakin, J. (2006). Nonverbal test scores as one component of an identification system: Integrating ability, achievement, and teacher ratings. In J. VanTassel-Baska (Ed.). Alternative assessments for identifying gifted and talented students. Austin, TX: Prufrock Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lubart, T. (2003). Psychologie de la créativité. Paris: Armand Colin.Search in Google Scholar

Lubart, T., & Caroff, X. (2015). Has creativity research become a trivial pursuit? Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 44-48; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0006.10.1515/ctra-2015-0006Search in Google Scholar

Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar

Min Tang, L. (2015). Revisiting the systems approach: Commentary on Glăveanu’s paper “ The Psychology of Creativity: A Critical Reading”. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 79-84; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0012.10.1515/ctra-2015-0012Search in Google Scholar

Montuori, A., & Purser, R. (1997). Social creativity: The challenge of complexity. Translation of Le dimensioni sociali della creatività. Pluriverso, 1, 2, 78-88.Search in Google Scholar

Moran, S. (2015). Creativity is a label for the aggregated, time-dependent, subjective judgments by creators and by adopters. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 64-69; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0009.10.1515/ctra-2015-0009Search in Google Scholar

Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nijstad, B., & Paulus, P. (2003). Group creativity: Common themes and future directions. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 326-339). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Persson, R. (2015). Erudite, insightful and immensely important: A commentary on V. P. Glǎveanu’s critical article ‘The psychology of creativity – a critical reading’. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 17-20; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0002.10.1515/ctra-2015-0002Search in Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., & Runco, M. A. (1998). The death of creativity measurement has been greatly exaggerated: Current issues, recent advances, and future directions in creativity assessment. Roeper Review, 21, 1, 36-39.10.1080/02783199809553924Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2015). A Commentary on the social perspective on creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 21-31; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0003.10.1515/ctra-2015-0003Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2003). Creative cultures, nations, and civilizations: Strategies and results. In P. Paulus & B. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration (pp. 304-325). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Tan, A.-G. (2015). Knowing creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 85-89; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0013.10.1515/ctra-2015-0013Search in Google Scholar

Tanggaard, L. (2015). Reaching out for everyday life creativity. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 75-78; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0011.10.1515/ctra-2015-0011Search in Google Scholar

Tanggaard, L. & Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). Creativity assessment as intervention: The case of creative learning. Akademisk Kvarter/Academic Quarter, 9(1), 18-30.Search in Google Scholar

Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and custom, 1. London: Murray.Search in Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (Ed.) (1986). The individual subject and scientific psychology. New York, NY: Plenum.10.1007/978-1-4899-2239-7Search in Google Scholar

Valsiner, J. (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.10.4135/9781473905986Search in Google Scholar

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Wagoner, B. (2015). From crisis to creativity: Towards a psychology of creating. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 2, 1, 70-74; DOI: 10.1515/ctra-2015-0010.10.1515/ctra-2015-0010Search in Google Scholar

Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological Review, 20, 2,158-177.10.1037/h0074428Search in Google Scholar

West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in work groups. Applied psychology: An international review, 51, 3, 355-424.10.1111/1464-0597.00951Search in Google Scholar

Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23, 1, 24-37.10.1080/10400419.2011.545713Search in Google Scholar

Zha, P., Walczyk, J. J., Griffith-Ross, D. A., Tobacyk, J. J., & Walczyk, D. F. (2006). The impact of culture and individualism–collectivism on the creative potential and achievement of American and Chinese adults. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3, 355-366.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_10Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo