1. bookVolume 2 (2015): Issue 1 (June 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

A Commentary on the Social Perspective on Creativity

Published Online: 26 May 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 2 (2015) - Issue 1 (June 2015)
Page range: 21 - 31
Received: 03 Dec 2014
Accepted: 21 Dec 2014
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
2354-0036
First Published
16 Apr 2015
Publication timeframe
2 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This commentary examines the social perspective on creativity, as presented in the featured article. There are several attractive aspects to the social perspective, but serious limitations as well, which are detailed in this commentary. The assumptions of the social perspective are also discussed. The most questionable of these assumes that social recognition and impact are inherent parts of creativity. The parsimonious alternative is to define creativity such that it includes only what is related to creativity per se and to recognize that social recognition may follow creation and is certainly extricable from it. A defence of this parsimonious view is presented. A brief discussion of possible crises in the field of creativity studies is also presented, with one suggestion being that the diverse approaches used in the field represent a kind of divergent thinking and as such represent progress, even though it is not linear. This commentary concludes with a discussion about creativity being vital for quality of life. That perspective differs dramatically from the product view of creativity which is often tied to a social perspective.

Keywords

Albert, R. S. (1995). Madison Avenue Comes to Academe. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 427-429.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_11Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1995). Attributions of Creativity: What Are the Consequences? Creativity Research Journal 8, 423-426.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_10Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1985). Motivation and creativity: Effects of motivational orientation on creative writers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 393-399.10.1037/0022-3514.48.2.393Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. (2010). What really motivates workers. Harvard Business Review, 88, 1, 44-45.Search in Google Scholar

Barron, F. (1995). No rootless flower: An ecology of creativity. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Search in Google Scholar

Eisenberger, R., & Shanock, L. (2003). Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 121-130.10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_02Search in Google Scholar

Glăveanu, V. P. (2014). The psychology of creativity: A critical reading. Creativity. Theories – Research – Applications, 1, 10-32; DOI: 10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02.10.15290/ctra.2014.01.01.02Search in Google Scholar

Gruber, H. E. (1988). The evolving systems approach to creative work. Creativity Research Journal, 1, 27-51.10.1080/10400418809534285Search in Google Scholar

Kasof, J. (1995). Explaining creativity: The attributional perspective. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 311-366.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_1Search in Google Scholar

Kharkhurin, A. (2014). Creativity four-in-one: Four Criterion Construct of Creativity Creativity Research Journal, 26, 338–352.10.1080/10400419.2014.929424Search in Google Scholar

Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, R. (1991). A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: Chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 41, 59–95.10.1177/0022167801412006Search in Google Scholar

Richards, R. (2007). Everyday creativity and new views of human nature. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Search in Google Scholar

Rogers, C. R. (1959). Toward a theory of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation (pp. 69-82). New York: Harper & Row.Search in Google Scholar

Rothenberg, A. (1999). Janusian processes. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 103-108). San Diego, CA: Academic.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1989). The creativity of children’s art. Child Study Journal, 19, 177-189.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1995). Insight for creativity, expression for impact. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 377-390.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_4Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (1999). Misjudgment of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 235-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2005). Self-actualization. In N. J. Salkind (Ed.). Encyclopedia of human development (pp. 1132-1133). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2010). Creative thinking may be simultaneous as well as blind [Comment on Creative thought as blind-variation and selective retention: Combinatorial models of exceptional creativity by Dean Keith Simonton] Physics of Life Reviews, 7, 184-185.10.1016/j.plrev.2010.04.011Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A. (2010). Products depend on creative potential: A comment on the productivist industrial model of knowledge production. Gifted and Talented International, 25, 81-87.10.1080/15332276.2010.11673554Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 92-96.10.1080/10400419.2012.650092Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., McCarthy, K. A., & Svensen, E. (1994). Judgments of the creativity of artwork from students and professional artists. Journal of Psychology, 128, 23-31.10.1080/00223980.1994.9712708Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M. A., & Smith, W. R. (1992). Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 295-302.10.1016/0191-8869(92)90105-XSearch in Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1995). If You Change Your Name to Mark Twain, Will You Be Judged As Creative? Creativity Research Journal, 8, 367-370.10.1207/s15326934crj0804_2Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously: A Quantitative Three-Criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 97-106.10.1080/10400419.2012.676974Search in Google Scholar

Wallach, M. A., & Wing, C. W. Jr. (1969). The Talent Student: A Validation of the Creativity Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo