This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Andreoni, James, and John Miller. 2002. “Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism.” Econometrica 70(2): 737−753.AndreoniJames,JohnMiller.2002“Giving according to GARP: An experimental test of the consistency of preferences for altruism.”702737−75310.1111/1468-0262.00302Search in Google Scholar
Andreoni, J., and Bernheim, B. D. 2009. “Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects.” Econometrica 77(5): 1607–1636.AndreoniJ.BernheimB. D.2009“Social image and the 50–50 norm: A theoretical and experimental analysis of audience effects.”7751607163610.3982/ECTA7384Search in Google Scholar
Atzmüller, Christiane, and Peter M. Steiner. 2010. “Experimental vignette studies in survey research.” Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences 6(3): 128.AtzmüllerChristiane,PeterM. Steiner.2010“Experimental vignette studies in survey research.”6312810.1027/1614-2241/a000014Search in Google Scholar
Becker, M., McElvany, N., and Kortenbruck, M. 2010. “Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study.” Journal of Educational psychology 102(4): 773.BeckerM.McElvanyN.KortenbruckM.2010“Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study.”102477310.1037/a0020084Search in Google Scholar
Bolton, Gary E., and Axel Ockenfels. 2000. “ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition.” American Economic Review 90(1): 166−193.BoltonGary E.AxelOckenfels.2000“ERC: A theory of equity, reciprocity, and competition.”901166−19310.1257/aer.90.1.166Search in Google Scholar
Chandrashekaran, R. and Jagpal, H., 1995. Is there a well-defined internal reference price?. ACR North American Advances available at: http://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference-proceedings.aspx?Id=7706ChandrashekaranR.JagpalH.1995Is there a well-defined internal reference price?available athttp://www.acrwebsite.org/search/view-conference-proceedings.aspx?Id=7706Search in Google Scholar
Chandrashekaran, Rajesh, and Dhruv Grewal. 2006. “Anchoring effects of advertised reference price and sale price: The moderating role of saving presentation format.” Journal of Business Research 59(10): 1063−1071.ChandrashekaranRajesh,DhruvGrewal.2006“Anchoring effects of advertised reference price and sale price: The moderating role of saving presentation format.”59101063−107110.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.006Search in Google Scholar
Dohmen, Thomas J., Armin Falk, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde, Jürgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner. 2005. “Individual risk attitudes: New evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey.” IZA Discussion Paper No. 1730, available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=807408 (accessed 20 April 2016).DohmenThomas J.ArminFalkDavidHuffmanUweSundeJürgenSchuppGertG. Wagner.2005IZA Discussion Paper No. 1730, available athttp://ssrn.com/abstract=807408(accessed 20 April 2016)10.2139/ssrn.807408Search in Google Scholar
Dohmen, Thomas J., Armin Falk, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde, Jürgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner. 2011. “Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences.” Journal of the European Economic Association 9(3): 522−550.DohmenThomas J.ArminFalkDavidHuffmanUweSundeJürgenSchuppGertG. Wagner.2011“Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences.”93522−55010.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.xSearch in Google Scholar
Fehr, Ernst, and Klaus M. Schmidt. 1999. “A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114(3): 817−868.FehrErnst,KlausM. Schmidt.1999“A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation.”1143817−86810.2307/j.ctvcm4j8j.14Search in Google Scholar
Gautier, Pieter A., and Bas van der Klaauw. 2012. “Selection in a field experiment with voluntary participation.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 27(1): 63−84.GautierPieter A.Basvan der Klaauw2012“Selection in a field experiment with voluntary participation.”27163−8410.1002/jae.1184Search in Google Scholar
Gneezy, Ayelet, Uri Gneezy, Leif D. Nelson, and Amber Brown. 2010. “Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving.” Science 329(5989): 325−327.GneezyAyelet, Uri Gneezy, Leif D. Nelson,AmberBrown.2010“Shared social responsibility: A field experiment in pay-what-you-want pricing and charitable giving.”3295989325−32710.1126/science.1186744Search in Google Scholar
Gneezy, Ayelet, Uri Gneezy, Gerhard Riener, and Leif D. Nelson. 2012. “Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(19): 7236−7240.GneezyAyeletUriGneezyGerhardRienerLeifD. Nelson.2012“Pay-what-you-want, identity, and self-signaling in markets.”109197236−724010.1073/pnas.1120893109Search in Google Scholar
Gołębiewski, Łukasz, and Paweł Waszczyk. 2016. “Rynek książki w Polsce, 2016”. Warszawa: Biblioteka Analiz.GołębiewskiŁukaszPawełWaszczyk2016WarszawaBiblioteka AnalizSearch in Google Scholar
Greiff, M., and Egbert, H. 2016. “A survey of the empirical evidence on PWYW pricing.” Available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/129295/1/845675966.pdfGreiffM.EgbertH.2016available athttps://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/129295/1/845675966.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Hainmueller, J., Hangartner, D., and Yamamoto, T. 2015. “Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(8): 2395–2400.HainmuellerJ.HangartnerD.YamamotoT.2015“Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior.”11282395240010.1073/pnas.1416587112Search in Google Scholar
Heyman, James, and Dan Ariely. 2004. “Effort for payment: A tale of two markets.” Psychological Science 15(11): 787−793.HeymanJames,DanAriely.2004“Effort for payment: A tale of two markets.”1511787−79310.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00757.xSearch in Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., Shachat, K., and Smith, V. 1994. “Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.” Games and Economic Behavior 7(3): 346–380.HoffmanE.McCabeK.ShachatK.SmithV.1994“Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games.”7334638010.1017/CBO9780511528347.008Search in Google Scholar
Hoffman, E., McCabe, K., and Vernon, L. S. 1996. “Social distance and other regarding behavior in dictator games.” The American Economic Review 86(3): 653–660.HoffmanE.McCabeK.VernonL. S.1996“Social distance and other regarding behavior in dictator games.”86365366010.1017/CBO9780511528347.009Search in Google Scholar
Johnson, Jennifer Wiggins, and Annie Peng Cui. 2013. “To influence or not to influence: External reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing.” Journal of Business Research 66(2): 275−281.JohnsonJennifer Wiggins,AnniePeng Cui.2013“To influence or not to influence: External reference price strategies in pay-what-you-want pricing.”662275−28110.1016/j.jbusres.2012.09.015Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Ju-Young, Martin Natter, and Martin Spann. 2009. “Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism.” Journal of Marketing 73(1): 44−58.KimJu-Young, Martin Natter,MartinSpann.2009“Pay what you want: A new participative pricing mechanism.”73144−5810.1509/jmkg.73.1.044Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Ju-Young, Katharina Kaufmann, and Manuel Stegemann. 2014. “The impact of buyer–seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism”, Marketing Letters 25(4): 409−423.KimJu-Young, Katharina Kaufmann,ManuelStegemann.2014“The impact of buyer–seller relationships and reference prices on the effectiveness of the pay what you want pricing mechanism”254409−42310.1007/s11002-013-9261-2Search in Google Scholar
Kunter, Marcus. 2015. “Exploring the pay-what-you-want payment motivation.” Journal of Business Research 68(11): 2347−2357.KunterMarcus.2015“Exploring the pay-what-you-want payment motivation.”68112347−235710.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.044Search in Google Scholar
León, F. J., Noguera, J. A., and Tena-Sánchez, J. 2012. “How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in El trato.” Social Science Information 51(3): 389–417.LeónF. J.NogueraJ. A.Tena-SánchezJ.2012“How much would you like to pay? Trust, reciprocity and prosocial motivations in El trato.”51338941710.1177/0539018412441756Search in Google Scholar
Lynn, Michael, Sean Masaki Flynn, and Chelsea Helion. 2013. “Do consumers prefer round prices? Evidence from pay-what-you-want decisions and self-pumped gasoline purchases.” Journal of Economic Psychology 36: 96−102.LynnMichaelSeanMasaki FlynnChelseaHelion.2013“Do consumers prefer round prices? Evidence from pay-what-you-want decisions and self-pumped gasoline purchases.”3696−10210.1016/j.joep.2013.01.010Search in Google Scholar
Mak, Vincent, Rami Zwick, and Akshay R. Rao. 2010. “Pay what you want as a profitable pricing strategy: Theory and experimental evidence.” Unpublished Manuscript, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, available at: http://rady.ucsd.edu/faculty/seminars/2010/papers/zwick.pdf (accessed 30 May 2017).MakVincent, Rami Zwick,AkshayR. Rao.2010Unpublished Manuscript, University of CambridgeCambridge, UKavailable athttp://rady.ucsd.edu/faculty/seminars/2010/papers/zwick.pdf(accessed 30 May 2017)Search in Google Scholar
Natter, Martin, and Katharina Kaufmann. 2015. “Voluntary market payments: Underlying motives, success drivers and success potentials.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 57: 149–157.NatterMartin,KatharinaKaufmann.2015“Voluntary market payments: Underlying motives, success drivers and success potentials.”5714915710.1016/j.socec.2015.05.008Search in Google Scholar
Regner, Tobias, and Gerhard Riener. 2012. “Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the internet: A natural field experiment”, DICE Discussion Paper, No. 82, available at: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/68231/1/734357842.pdf (accessed 30 May 2017).RegnerTobias,GerhardRiener.2012“Voluntary payments, privacy and social pressure on the internet: A natural field experiment”82available athttps://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/68231/1/734357842.pdfaccessed 30 May 2017Search in Google Scholar
Regner, Tobias, and Javier A. Barria. 2009. “Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music”, Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 71(2): 395–406.RegnerTobias,JavierA. Barria.2009“Do consumers pay voluntarily? The case of online music”71239540610.1016/j.jebo.2009.04.001Search in Google Scholar
Rossi, P.H., 1979. 14. Vignette analysis: uncovering the normative structure of complex judgments. Qualitative and quantitative social research: Papers in honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld p.176.RossiP.H.197914. Vignette analysis: uncovering the normative structure of complex judgments176Search in Google Scholar
Schaffner, E., and Schiefele, U. 2016. “The contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation to the development of reading competence over summer vacation.” Reading Psychology 37(6): 917–941.SchaffnerE.SchiefeleU.2016“The contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation to the development of reading competence over summer vacation.”37691794110.1080/02702711.2015.1133465Search in Google Scholar
Steiner, Peter M., Christiane Atzmüller, and Dan Su. 2016. “Designing Valid and Reliable Vignette Experiments for Survey Research: A Case Study on the Fair Gender Income Gap.” Journal of Methods and Measurement in the Social Sciences7(2).SteinerPeter M.ChristianeAtzmüllerDanSu.2016“Designing Valid and Reliable Vignette Experiments for Survey Research: A Case Study on the Fair Gender Income Gap.”7210.2458/jmm.v7i2.20321Search in Google Scholar
Wason, K. D., Polonsky, M. J., and Hyman, M. R. 2002. “Designing vignette studies in marketing.” Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) 10(3): 41–58.WasonK. D.PolonskyM. J.HymanM. R.2002“Designing vignette studies in marketing.”103415810.1016/S1441-3582(02)70157-2Search in Google Scholar