[1. Noam, N., T. Roughgarden, E. Tardos, V. V. Vazirani, Eds. Algorithmic Game Theory. New York, USA, Cambridge University Press, 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Roughgarden, T., É. Tardos. How Bad is Selfish Routing? - J. ACM, Vol. 49, March 2002, No 2, pp. 236-259.10.1145/506147.506153]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Parkes, D. C. Online Mechanisms. - In: [1], pp. 411-439.10.1017/CBO9780511800481.018]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Albers, S. Online Algorithms in Interactive Computation: The New Paradigm. D. Q. Goldin, S.A. Smolka and P. Wegner, Eds. Springer, 2006, pp. 143-164.10.1007/3-540-34874-3_7]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Galstyan, A., S. Kolar, K. Lerman. Resource Allocation Games with Changing Resource Capacities. - In: Proc. of International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS-2003), 2003, Melbourne, Australia, pp. 145-152.10.1145/860575.860599]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bazzan, A. L. C., F. Klügl. Case Studies on the Braess Paradox: Simulating Route Recommendation and Learning in Abstract and Microscopic Models. - Transportation Research, Part C. Emerging Technologies, Vol. 13, 2005, No 4, pp. 299-319.10.1016/j.trc.2005.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Claes, R., T. Holvoet, D. Weyns. A Decentralized Approach for Anticipatory Vehicle Routing Using Delegate Multi-Agent Systems. - IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 12, 2011, No 2, pp. 364-373.10.1109/TITS.2011.2105867]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Dynamic Traffic Assignment: A Primer, Transportation Research Circular Number E-C153, Transportation Research Board, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Dallmeyer, J., R. Schumann, A. D. Lattner, I. J. T i m m. Don’t Go with the Ant Flow: Ant-Inspired Traffic Routing in Urban Environments. - In: 7th International Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation (ATT 2012) Held at AAMAS 2012, 2012, pp. 59-68.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Wahle, J., A. L. C. Bazzan, F. Klügl, M. Schreckenberg. Decision Dynamics in a Traffic Scenario. - Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Vol. 287, 2000, Issues 3-4, pp. 669-681.10.1016/S0378-4371(00)00510-0]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Braess, D. Über ein Paradoxon aus der Verkehrsplanung. - Unternehmensforschung, Vol. 12, 1968, p. 258.10.1007/BF01918335]Search in Google Scholar
[12.Galafassii, C., A. L. C.Bazzan. Evolving Mechanisms in Boolean Games. - In: Proc. of Multiagent System Technologies, 11th German Conference, MATES 2013, Koblenz, Germany, 2013, pp. 73-86.10.1007/978-3-642-40776-5_9]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Varga, L. Z. Online Routing Games and the Benefit of Online Data, in Eighth International Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation. - In: Proc. of 13th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2014), May 5-6, 2014, Paris, France, pp. 88-95.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Varga, L. Z. On Intention-Propagation-Based Prediction in Autonomously Self-Adapting Navigation. - In: Proc. of 2014 IEEE 8th International Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshops, 8 September, 2014, London, UK, pp. 38-44.10.1109/SASOW.2014.17]Search in Google Scholar