1. bookVolume 16 (2016): Issue 3 (July 2016)
Journal Details
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
access type Open Access

Motivation, Stress and Learning – Critical Characteristics that Influence the Horses’ Value and Training Method – A Review

Published Online: 02 Aug 2016
Volume & Issue: Volume 16 (2016) - Issue 3 (July 2016)
Page range: 641 - 652
Received: 10 Jul 2015
Accepted: 12 Jan 2016
Journal Details
First Published
25 Nov 2011
Publication timeframe
4 times per year

Equine husbandry is carried out in an environment unnatural to horses, which enforces their adaptation to artificial conditions. Besides housing conditions, the management and human-horse relationship is very important for both human safety and a high level of animal welfare and performance. This would not be possible if horses were not able to learn. For equestrians, independently of the horse’s use (sport, work, recreation, therapy etc.) the performance is of the highest importance. Deep knowledge about learning mechanisms is essential to maintain high level of horses’ welfare and to achieve effective training. Cognition can be influenced by motivation and stress. Motivational mechanisms are based on positive or negative reinforcement but still it is not known what motivates horses more and how food motivation influences learning. It was already shown that a low level of motivation decreases animal performance. The effect of stress is an increasingly popular research topic. It has been shown that acute stress decreases horses’ learning performance, but the exact standard is still unknown. The Yerkes-Dodson law claims that low and too high arousal decreases learning. What is more, the relation between learning and sex, breed and some temperamental traits has been shown in several studies.


Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A., de Vries P. (2001). On the psychology of drinking: being thirsty and perceptually ready. Brit. J. Psychol., 92: 631–642.Search in Google Scholar

Adamczyk K., Górecka-Bruzda A., Nowicki J., Gumułka M., Molik E., Schwarz T., Earley B., Klocek C. (2015). Perception of environment in farm animals – a review. Ann. Anim. Sci., 15: 565–589.Search in Google Scholar

Ahrendt L.P., Christensen J.W., Ladewig J. (2012). The ability of horses to learn an instrumental task through social observation. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 139: 105–113.Search in Google Scholar

Ahrendt L.P., Labouriau R., Malmkvist J.N., Christine J., Christensen J.W. (2015). Development of a standard test to assess negative reinforcement learning in horses. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 169: 38–42.Search in Google Scholar

Berridge K.C. (2001). Reward learning: Reinforcement, Incentives and Expectations, Medin D.L. (ed.). Psychol. Learn. Motiv., 40: 223–278.Search in Google Scholar

Broom D.M., Fraser A.F. (2007). Domestic animal behaviour and welfare – 4th edition. CAB International, pp. 27–51.Search in Google Scholar

Buchanan T.W., Tranel D., Adolphs R. (2006). Impaired memory retrieval correlates with individual differences in cortisol response but not autonomic response. Learn. Memory, 13: 382–387.Search in Google Scholar

Cahill L., Gorski L., Le K. (2003). Enhanced human memory consolidation with post-learning stress: Interaction with the degree of arousal at encoding. Learn. Memory, 10: 270–274.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese E.J. (2008). Stress biology and hormesis: the Yerkes-Dodson law in psychology – a special case of the hormesis dose response. Crit. Rev. Toxicol., 38: 453–462.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen J.W. (2013). Object habituation in horses: the effect of voluntary versus negatively reinforced approach to frightening stimuli. Equine Vet. J., 45: 298–301.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen J.W., Zharkikh T., Chovaux E. (2011). Object recognition and generalisation during habituation in horses. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 129: 83–91.Search in Google Scholar

Christensen J.W., Ahrendt L.P., Lintrup R., Gaillard C., Palme R., Malmkvist J. (2012). Does learning performance in horses relate to fearfulness, baseline stress hormone, and social rank? Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 140: 44–52.Search in Google Scholar

Elzinga B.M., Bakker A., Bremner J.D. (2005). Stress-induced cortisol elevations are associated with impaired delayed, but not immediate recall. Psychiat. Res., 134: 211–223.Search in Google Scholar

Flagel S.B., Robinson T.E., Clark J.J., Clinton S.M., Watson S.J., Seeman P., Akil H. (2010). An animal model of genetic vulnerability to behavioral disinhibition and responsiveness to reward-related cues: implications for addiction. Neuropsychopharmacol., 35: 388–400.Search in Google Scholar

Freymond S.B., Briefer E.F., Zollinger A., Gindrat-von Allmen Y., Wyss C., Bachmann I. (2014). Behaviour of horses in a judgment bias test associated with positive or negative reinforcement. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 158: 34–45.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin D. (1999). The importance of ethology in understanding the behaviour of the horse. Equine Vet. J. Suppl., 28: 15–19.Search in Google Scholar

Gough M.R. (1999). A note on the use of behavioural modification to aid clipping ponies. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 63: 171–175.Search in Google Scholar

Hausberger M., Gautier E., Jego P., Mu C. (2007). Lower learning abilities in stereotypic horses. App. Anim. Behav., 107: 299–306.Search in Google Scholar

Hawson L.A., McLean A.N., McGreevy P.D. (2010). The roles of equine ethology and applied learning theory in horse-related human injuries. J. Vet. Behav., 5: 324–338.Search in Google Scholar

Held S., Cooper J.J., Mendl M.T. (2009). Advances in the Study of Cognition, Behavioural Priorities and Emotions. The Welfare of Pigs. Springer Netherlands, pp. 47–94.10.1007/978-1-4020-8909-1_3Search in Google Scholar

Hendriksen P., Elmgreen K., Ladewig J. (2011). Trailer-loading of horses: Is there a difference between positive and negative reinforcement concerning effectiveness and stress-related signs? J. Vet. Behavior., 6: 261–266.Search in Google Scholar

Hori Y., Ozaki T., Yamada Y., Tozaki T., Kim H.-S., Takimoto A., Fujita K. (2013). Breed differences in dopamine receptor D4 gene (DRD4) in horses. J. Equine Sci., 24: 31–36.Search in Google Scholar

Janczarek I., Stachurska A., Wilk I. (2014). Which horses are most susceptible to the initial natural training? Ann. Anim. Sci., 14: 637–648.Search in Google Scholar

Joëls M., Pu Z., Wiegert O., Oitzl M.S., Krugers H.J. (2006). Learning under stress: How does it work? Trends Cogn. Sci., 10: 152–158.Search in Google Scholar

Lansade L., Simon F. (2010). Horses’ learning performances are under the influence of several temperamental dimensions. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 125: 30–37.Search in Google Scholar

Lansade L., Neveux C., Levy F. (2012). A few days of social separation affects yearling horses’ response to emotional reactivity tests and enhances learning performance. Behav. Proc., 91: 94–102.Search in Google Scholar

Lansade L., Coutureau E., Marchand A., Baranger G., Valenchon M., Calandreau L. (2013). Dimensions of temperament modulate cue-controlled behavior: a study on Pavlovian to instrumental transfer in horses (Equus caballus). PloS One, 8(6), 64853.10.1371/journal.pone.0064853368298723798994Search in Google Scholar

Leiner L., Fendt M. (2011). Behavioural fear and heart rate responses of horses after exposure to novel objects: Effects of habituation. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 131: 104–109.Search in Google Scholar

Lindberg A., Kelland A., Nicol C. (1999). Effects of observational learning on acquisition of an operant response in horses. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 61: 187–199.Search in Google Scholar

Lorenz K. (1966). On Aggression. Methuen, London.Search in Google Scholar

Martin T.I., Zentall T.R., Lawrence L. (2006). Simple discrimination reversals in the domestic horse (Equus caballus): Effect of discriminative stimulus modality on learning to learn. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 101: 328–338.Search in Google Scholar

McCall C.A. (1990). A review of learning behavior in horses and its application in horse training. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 75–81.Search in Google Scholar

McClelland D.C. (1988). Human motivation. New York: Cambridge University Press, p. 4, 84, 553.10.1017/CBO9781139878289Search in Google Scholar

McGreevy P. (2004). Equine behaviour. A guide for veterinarians and equine scientists. Saunders, Elsevier Ltd., 369 pp.Search in Google Scholar

McGreevy P., McLean A. (2010). Equitation Science. Wiley-Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar

McLean A.N. (2008). Overshadowing: a silver lining to a dark cloud in horse training. J. Appl. Anim. Welf. Sci., 11: 236–248.Search in Google Scholar

Mendl M. (1999). Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 65: 221–244.Search in Google Scholar

Mengoli M., Pageat P., Lafont-Lecuelle C., Monneret P., Giacalone A., Sighieri C., Cozzi A. (2014). Influence of emotional balance during a learning and recall test in horses (Equus caballus). Behav. Proc., 106: 141–150.Search in Google Scholar

Mills D.S. (1998). Personality and individual differences in the horse, their significance, use and measurement. Equine Vet. J. Suppl, 27: 10–13.Search in Google Scholar

Mills D.S., Marchant-Forde J.N., McGreevy P.D., Morton D.B., Nicol C.J., Phillips C.J.C., Sandøe P., Swaisgood R.R. (2010). The Encyclopedia of Applied Animal Behaviour and Welfare. CAB International, UK, pp. 124–125, 512–513.10.1079/9780851997247.0000Search in Google Scholar

Murphy J., Hall C., Arkins S. (2009). What horses and humans see: a comparative review. Int. J. Zool., ID 721798: 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Nicol C. (2002). Equine learning: progress and suggestions for future research. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 78: 193–208.Search in Google Scholar

Nicol C.J. (2006). How animals learn from each other. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 100: 58–63.Search in Google Scholar

Ninomiya S., Mitsumasu T., Aoyama M., Kusunose R. (2007). A note on the effect of a palatable food reward on operant conditioning in horses. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 108: 342–347.Search in Google Scholar

Robinson T.E., Flagel S.B. (2009). Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences. Biol. Psychiat., 65: 869–873.Search in Google Scholar

Roozendaal B. (2000). Glucocorticoids and the regulation of memory consolidation. Psychoneuroendocrinol., 25: 213–238.Search in Google Scholar

Roozendaal B. (2002). Stress and memory: opposing effects of glucocorticoids on memory consolidation and memory retrieval. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 78: 578–595.Search in Google Scholar

Rørvang M.V., Ahrendt L.P., Christensen J.W. (2015). Horses fail to use social learning when solving spatial detour tasks. Anim. Cogn., 18: 847–854.Search in Google Scholar

Rothman J., Christensen O., Søndergaard E., Ladewig J. (2014). Behaviour observation during conformation evaluation at a field for Danish Warmblood horses and associations with rideability and performance traits. Equine Vet. J., 34: 288–293.Search in Google Scholar

Sandi C., Pinelo-Nava M.T. (2007). Stress and memory: behavioral effects and neurobiological mechanisms. Neural Plast., 2007: 1–20.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt A., Möstl E., Wehnert C., Aurich J., Müller J., Aurich C. (2010). Cortisol release and heart rate variability in horses during road transport. Horm. Behav., 57: 209–215.Search in Google Scholar

Schwabe L., Wolf O.T. (2010). Learning under stress impairs memory formation. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 93: 183–188.Search in Google Scholar

Schwabe L., Bohringer A., Chatterjee M., Schachinger H. (2008). Effects of prelearning stress on memory for neutral, positive and negative words: Different roles of cortisol and autonomic arousal. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem., 90: 44–53.Search in Google Scholar

Schwabe L., Joëls M., Roozendaal B., Wolf O.T., Oitzl M.S. (2012). Stress effects on memory: An update and integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. R, 36: 1740–1749.Search in Google Scholar

Toates F. (2004). Cognition, motivation, emotion and action: a dynamic and vulnerable interdependence. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 86: 173–204.Search in Google Scholar

Valenchon M., Lévy F., Fortin M., Leterrier C., Lansade L. (2013 a). Stress and temperament affect working memory performance for disappearing food in horses, Equus caballus. Anim. Behav., 86: 1233–1240.10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.09.026Search in Google Scholar

Valenchon M., Lévy F., Górecka-Bruzda A., Calandreau L., Lansade L. (2013 b). Characterization of long-term memory, resistance to extinction, and influence of temperament during two instrumental tasks in horses. Animal Cognition, 16: 1001–1006.10.1007/s10071-013-0648-523743707Search in Google Scholar

Valenchon M., Lévy F., Prunier A., Moussu C., Calandreau L., Lansade L. (2013 c). Stress modulates instrumental learning performances in horses (Equus caballus) in interaction with temperament. PloS One, 8(4), e62324.10.1371/journal.pone.0062324363389323626801Search in Google Scholar

Visser E., van Reenen C., Schilder M.B., Barneveld A., Blokhuis H. (2003). Learning performances in young horses using two different learning tests. Appl. Anim Behav. Sci., 80: 311–326.Search in Google Scholar

Von Lewinski M., Biau S., Erber R., Ille N., Aurich J., Faure J.-M., Aurich C. (2013). Cortisol release, heart rate and heart rate variability in the horse and its rider: different responses to training and performance. Vet. J., 197: 229–232.Search in Google Scholar

Wang X., Sánchez B.N., Golden S.H., Shrager S., Kirschbaum C., Karlamangla A.S., Diez Roux A.V. (2014). Stability and predictors of change in salivary cortisol measures over six years: MESA. Psychoneuroendocrinol., 49C: 310–320.Search in Google Scholar

Williams J.L., Friend T.H., Nevill C.H., Archer G. (2004). The efficacy of a secondary reinforcer (clicker) during acquisition and extinction of an operant task in horses. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 88: 331–341.Search in Google Scholar

Wolff A., Hausberger M. (1996). Learning and memorisation of two different tasks in horses: the effects of age, sex and sire. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 40: 137–143.Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo