[1. Singh VK, Romaine PL, Newman VL. Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? Expert Opin Biol Ther 2015;15:465-71. doi: 10.1517/14712598.2015.986453]Search in Google Scholar
[2. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation. Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. Vol. II Scientific Annex B New York: United Nations; 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Kovalchuk O, Ponton A, Filkowski J, Kovalchuk I. Dissimilar genome response to acute and chronic low-dose radiation in male and female mice. Mutat Res 2004;550:59-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.02.00710.1016/j.mrfmmm.2004.02.00715135641]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Fucic A, Gamulin M. Interaction between ionizing radiation and estrogen: what we are missing? Med Hypotheses 2011;77:966-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.08.021]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Suman S, Johnson MD, Fornace AJ Jr., Datta K. Exposure to ionizing radiation causes long-term increase in serum estradiol and activation of PI3K-Akt signaling pathway in mouse mammary gland. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84:500-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.033]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Hyodo H, Ishiguro H, Tomita Y, Takakura H, Koike T, Shimizu T, et al. Decreased serum testosterone levels in long-term adult survivors with fatty liver after childhood stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012;18:1119-27. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.01.004]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Fucic A, Gamulin M, Ferencic Z, Rokotov DS, Katic J, Bartonova A, Lovasic IB, Merlo DF. Lung cancer and environmental chemical exposure: a review of our current state of knowledge with reference to the role of hormones and hormone receptors as an increased risk factor for developing lung cancer in man. Toxicol Pathol 2010;38:849-55. doi: 10.1177/0192623310378136]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Okoh V, Deoraj A, Roy D. Estrogen-induced reactive oxygen species-mediated signalings contribute to breast cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta 2011;1815:115-33. PubMed doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.10.005]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Tanaka Y, Sasaki M, Kaneuchi M, Fujimoto S, Dahiya R. Estrogen receptor alpha polymorphisms and renal cell carcinoma: a possible risk. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2003;202:109-16. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(03)00071-6]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P. Epidemiology and risk factors for pancreatic cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2006;20:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2005.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Newman MR, Sykes PJ, Blyth BJ, Bezak E, Lawrence MD, Morel KL, Ormsby RJ. The methylation of DNA repeat elements is sex-dependent and temporally different in response to X radiation in radiosensitive and radioresistant mouse strains. Radiat Res 2014;181:65-75. doi: 10.1667/ RR13460.1]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Antwih DA, Gabbara KM, Lancaster WD, Ruden DM, Zielske SP. Radiation-induced epigenetic DNA methylation modification of radiation-response pathways. Epigenetics 2013;8:839-48. doi: 10.4161/epi.25498]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Imaoka T, Nishimura M, Iizuka D, Nishimura Y, Ohmachi Y, Shimada Y. Pre- and postpubertal irradiation induces mammary cancers with distinct expression of hormone receptors, ErbB ligands, and developmental genes in rats. Mol Carcinog 2011;50:539-52. doi: 10.1002/mc.20746]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Davis TA, Clarke TK, Mog SR, Landauer MR. Subcutaneous administration of genistein prior to lethal irradiation supports multilineage, hematopoietic progenitor cell recovery and survival. International journal of radiation biology. 2007;83:141-51. doi: 10.1080/09553000601132642]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Grebeniuk AN, Bykov VN, Miasnikov VA, Zatsepin VV, Aksenova NV. [The experimental evaluation of antiradiation effectiveness of beta-estradiol on survival rates and bone marrow hemopoiesis of X-ray irradiated mice, in Russian]. Radiats Biol Radioecol 2012;52:175-80. PMID: 22690580.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Salama S, Diaz-Arrastia C, Patel D, Botting S, Hatch S. 2-Methoxyestradiol, an endogenous estrogen metabolite, sensitizes radioresistant MCF-7/FIR breast cancer cells through multiple mechanisms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;80:231-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.080]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Shao C, Folkard M, Held KD, Prise KM. Estrogen enhanced cell-cell signalling in breast cancer cells exposed to targeted irradiation. BMC Cancer 2008;8:184. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-184]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Polkinghorn WR, Parker JS, Lee MX, Kass EM, Spratt DE, Iaquinta PJ, Arora VK, Yen WF, Cai L, Zheng D, Carver BS, Chen Y, Watson PA, Shah NP, Fujisawa S, Goglia AG, Gopalan A, Hieronymus H, Wongvipat J, Scardino PT, Zelefsky MJ, Jasin M, Chaudhuri J, Powell SN, Sawyers CL. Androgen receptor signaling regulates DNA repair in prostate cancers. Cancer Discov 2013;3:1245-53. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0172.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Filchenkov GN, Popoff EH, Naumov AD. The low dose gamma ionising radiation impact upon cooperativity of androgen-specific proteins. J Environ Radioact 2014;127:182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2013.02.002]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Bruheim K, Svartberg J, Carlsen E, Dueland S, Haug E, Skovlund E, Tveit KM, Guren MG. Radiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with reduced serum testosterone and increased FSH and LH. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008;70:722-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.043]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Mantovani A, Fucic A. Puberty dysregulation and increased risk of disease in adult life: possible modes of action. Reprod Toxicol 2014;44:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.06.002]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Fucic A, Brunborg G, Lasan R, Jezek D, Knudsen LE, Merlo DF. Genomic damage in children accidentally exposed to ionizing radiation: a review of the literature. Mutat Res 2008;658:111-23. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2007.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Tang J, Fernandez-Garcia I, Vijayakumar S, Martinez-Ruis H, Illa-Bochaca I, Nguyen DH, Mao JH, Costes SV, Barcellos-Hoff MH. Irradiation of juvenile, but not adult, mammary gland increases stem cell self-renewal and estrogen receptor negative tumors. Stem Cells 2014;32:649-61. doi: 10.1002/stem.1533]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Dygalo NN, Sakharov DG, Shishkina GT. Kortikosteron i testosteron v krovi vzroslykh krys: effekty nizkikh doz i sroka deistviia ioniziruiushchei radiatsii v period vnutriutrobnogo razvitiia [Corticosterone and testosterone in the blood of adult rats: the effects of low doses and the times of the action of ionizing radiation during intrauterine development, in Russian]. Radiats Biol Radioecol 1997;37:377-81. PMID: 9244526.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Baquedano MS, Saraco N, Berensztein E, Pepe C, Bianchini M, Levy E, Goñi J, Rivarola MA, Belgorosky A. Identification and developmental changes of aromatase and estrogen receptor expression in prepubertal and pubertal human adrenal tissues. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:2215-22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-2329]Search in Google Scholar
[26. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). Radiogenic Cancer Risk Models and Projections for the U.S. Population. Washington: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air; 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Hayashi M, Tice RR, MacGregor JT, Anderson D, Blakey DH, Kirsh-Volders M, Oleson FB Jr, Pacchierotti F, Romagna F, Shimada H, Sutou S, Vannier B. In vivo rodent erythrocyte micronucleus assay. Mutat Res 1994;312:293-304. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(94)90039-6]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Liu L, Liu Y, Ni G, Liu S. Flow cytometric scoring of micronucleated reticulocytes as a possible high-throughput radiation biodosimeter. Environ Mol Mutagen 2010;51:215-21. doi: 10.1002/em.20523]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Li MJ, Wang WW, Chen SW, Shen Q, Min R. Radiation dose effect of DNA repair-related gene expression in mouse white blood cells. Med Sci Monit 2011;17:BR290-7. doi: 10.12659/ MSM.881976]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Maurya DK, Devasagayam TP. Ferulic acid inhibits gamma radiation-induced DNA strand breaks and enhances the survival of mice. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2013;28:51-7. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2012.1263]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Mackova NO, Fedorocko P. Recovery of peripheral blood cells in irradiated mice pretreated with bacterial extract IRS-19. Physiol Res 2000;49:703-10. PMID: 11252537]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Linden MW JM, Cherina S. Haematopoietic and lymphoid tissues, comparative anatomy and histology. In: Treuting PM, Dintzis SM, Liggitt D, Frevert CW, editor. Comparative Anatomy and Histology A Mouse and Human Atlas. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Dertinger SD, Tsai Y, Nowak I, Hyrien O, Sun H, Bemis JC, Torous DK, Keng P, Palis J, Chen Y. Reticulocyte and micronucleated reticulocyte responses to gamma irradiation: dose-response and time-course profiles measured by flow cytometry. Mutat Res 2007;634:119-25. doi: 10.1016/j. mrgentox.2007.06.010]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Nair GG, Nair CK. Radioprotective effects of gallic acid in mice. Biomed Res Int 2013;2013:953079. doi: 10.1155/2013/953079]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Hudson D, Kovalchuk I, Koturbash I, Kolb B, Martin OA, Kovalchuk O. Induction and persistence of radiation-induced DNA damage is more pronounced in young animals than in old animals. Aging (Albany NY) 2011;3:609-20. doi: 10.18632/aging.100340]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Utsuyama M, Hirokawa K. Radiation-induced-thymic lymphoma occurs in young, but not in old mice. Exp Mol Pathol 2003;74:319-25. doi: 10.1016/S0014-4800(03)00026-1]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Grande T, Bueren JA. Involvement of the bone marrow stroma in the residual hematopoietic damage induced by irradiation of adult and young mice. Exp Hematol 1994;22:1283-7. PMID: 7957714]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Nikkels PG, de Jong JP, Ploemacher RE. Radiation sensitivity of hemopoietic stroma: long-term partial recovery of hemopoietic stromal damage in mice treated during growth. Radiat Res 1987;109:330-41. PMID: 380940210.2307/3576958]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. New Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Sorensen KJ, Zetterberg LA, Nelson DO, Grawe J, Tucker JD. The in vivo dose rate effect of chronic gamma radiation in mice: translocation and micronucleus analyses. Mutat Res 2000;457:125-36. doi: 10.1016/S0027-5107(00)00136-6]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Pogribny I, Raiche J, Slovack M, Kovalchuk O. Dosedependence, sex- and tissue-specificity, and persistence of radiation-induced genomic DNA methylation changes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;320:1253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.06.081]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Ilnytskyy Y, Zemp FJ, Koturbash I, Kovalchuk O. Altered microRNA expression patterns in irradiated hematopoietic tissues suggest a sex-specific protective mechanism. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;377:41-5. doi: 10.1016/j. bbrc.2008.09.080]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Dobrzynska MM. DNA damage in organs of female and male mice exposed to nonylphenol, as a single agent or in combination with ionizing irradiation: a comet assay study. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 2014;772:14-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2014.07.003]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Davis TA, Mungunsukh O, Zins S, Day RM, Landauer MR. Genistein induces radioprotection by hematopoietic stem cell quiescence. Int J Radiat Biol 2008;84:713-26. doi: 10.1080/09553000802317778]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Zhou Y, Mi MT. Genistein stimulates hematopoiesis and increases survival in irradiated mice. J Radiat Res 2005;46:425-33. PMID: 1639463310.1269/jrr.46.425]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Lebedev VG, Moroz BB, Vorotnikova TV, Deshevoi Iu B. Issledovanie mekhanizma formirovaniia radiorezistentnogo sostoianiia sistemy krovetvoreniia pod deistviem dietilstill’bstrola [Mechanism of radioresistance of the hematopoietic system after treatment with diethylstilbestrol in Russian]. Radiats Biol Radioecol 1994;34:565-71. PMID: 7951885]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Ricoul M, Dutrillaux B. Hyper-radiosensibilite chromosomique des souris en fin de gestation [Chromosome hyper-radiosensitivity in mice at the end of pregnancy, in French]. C R Acad Sci III 1991;312:635-9. PMID: 1913237]Search in Google Scholar
[48. MacLusky NJ, Chaptal C, McEwen BS. The development of estrogen receptor systems in the rat brain and pituitary: postnatal development. Brain Res 1979;178:143-60. PMID: 49785710.1016/0006-8993(79)90094-5]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Azria D, Larbouret C, Cunat S, Ozsahin M, Gourgou S, Martineau P, Evans DB, Romieu G, Pujol P, Pèlegrin A. Letrozole sensitizes breast cancer cells to ionizing radiation. Breast Cancer Res 2005;7:R156-63. doi: 10.1186/bcr969]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Zhao X, Zhang Q. [Clinical efficacy of letrozole in boys with idiopathic central precocious puberty, in Chinese]. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2014;16:397-400. doi: 10.7499/j. issn.1008-8830.2014.04.018]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Ankarberg C, Norjavaara E. Diurnal rhythm of testosterone secretion before and throughout puberty in healthy girls: correlation with 17beta-estradiol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. J Clinl Endocrinol Metab 1999;84:975-84. doi: 10.1210/jcem.84.3.5524]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Khairullah A, Klein LC, Ingle SM, May MT, Whetzel CA, Susman EJ, Paus T. Testosterone trajectories and reference ranges in a large longitudinal sample of male adolescents. PLoS One 2014;9(9):e108838. doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0108838]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Courant F, Aksglaede L, Antignac JP, Monteau F, Sorensen K, Andersson AM, Skakkebaek NE, Juul A, Bizec BL. Assessment of circulating sex steroid levels in prepubertal and pubertal boys and girls by a novel ultrasensitive gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010;95:82-92. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-1140]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Belgorosky A, Rivarola MA. Progressive increase in nonsex hormone-binding globulin-bound testosterone and estradiol from infancy to late prepuberty in girls. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1988;67:234-7. doi: 10.1210/jcem-67-2-234 ]Search in Google Scholar