1. bookVolume 65 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Effect of the Rearing System on the Establishment of Different Functional Groups of Microorganism in the Rumen of Kid Goats / Uticaj Sistema Uzgoja Na Uspostavljanje Različitih Funkcionalnih Grupa Mikroorganizama U Buragu Jaradi

Published Online: 23 Jun 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 65 (2015) - Issue 2 (June 2015)
Page range: 175 - 190
Received: 13 Jun 2014
Accepted: 12 Feb 2015
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

This study was aimed to determine the effect of the rearing system on the establishment and development of different functional groups of microorganisms in the rumen of kid goats. Fifty kids were fed on goat milk until weaning at 45 (TR, traditional rearing system, n = 25) and 30 days of age (alternative rearing system, AR, n = 25). In addition, only AR group was offered with rumen starter from birth. Both groups consumed alfalfa hay and ground corn between 30 and 90 days of age. Five kids from each group were slaughtered at 21, 30, 45, 70 and 90 days old. It was determined the total number of protozoa, anaerobic, amylolytic and cellulolytic bacteria present in the rumen. Kids of AR were lighter in weight than TR kids between 42 and 56 days old. In both rearing systems, anaerobic and amylolytic bacteria were found at 21 days of age, while cellulolytic and protozoa were not found until 45 days of age. Kids of AR had higher quantities of anaerobic and amylolytic bacteria until 30 and 45 days of age, respectively. These results demonstrate the rearing system does not affect the sequence and time in which the functional groups of microorganisms are established in the rumen. However, the alternative rearing system with early intake of solid food allowed the establishment of greater amount of bacteria and protozoa. Nevertheless, the effect of weaning on growth rate was more marked in kids from alternative rearing system, despite its greater microbiological rumen development.

Keywords

1. Baldwin RL, McLeod KR, Klotz JL, Heitmann, RN: Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and post-weaning ruminant. J Dairy Sci 2004, 87:E55-E65.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70061-2Search in Google Scholar

2. Dehority BA: Rumen Microbiology. Nottingham, United Kindom: Nottingham University Press, 2003, 372 p.Search in Google Scholar

3. Flint H, Bayer E: Plant cell wall breakdown by anaerobic microorganisms from the mammalian digestive tract. Ann NY Acad Sci 2008, 1125:280-288.10.1196/annals.1419.022Search in Google Scholar

4. Relling A, Mattioli G: Fisiología digestiva y metabólica de los rumiantes. Buenos Aires, Argentina: EDULP ed, 2002, 4-72.Search in Google Scholar

5. Grilli DJ: Selection of fibrolytic strictly anaerobic rumen bacteria in Criollo goats and identification of genes encoding for glycosyl hydrolases. PhD Thesis, Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, Mendoza, Argentina. 2013, 156 p.Search in Google Scholar

6. Rotger CA: Fermentación ruminal, degradación proteica y sincronización energía proteína en terneras en cebo intenso. Ph D Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España. 2005, 196 p.Search in Google Scholar

7. Suárez BJ, Van Reenen CG, Stockhofe N, Dijkstra J, Gerrits WJJ: Effect of roughage source and roughage to concentrate ratio on animal performance and rumen development in veal calves. J Dairy Sci 2007, 90:2390-2403.10.3168/jds.2006-524Search in Google Scholar

8. Wang YH, Xu M, Wang FN, Yu ZP, Yao JH, Zan LS, Yang FX: Effect of dietary starch on rumen and small intestine morphology and digesta pH in goats. Livest Sci 2009, 122:48-52.10.1016/j.livsci.2008.07.024Search in Google Scholar

9. Khan MA, Weary DM, von Keyserlingk MAG: Hay intake improves performance and rumen development of calves fed higher quantities of milk. J Dairy Sci 2011, 94:3547-3553.10.3168/jds.2010-3871Search in Google Scholar

10. Tamate H, McGilliard AD, Jacobson NL, Getty, R: Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf. J Dairy Sci 1962, 45:408-420.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(62)89406-5Search in Google Scholar

11. Anderson KL, Nagaraja TG, Morrill JL: Ruminal metabolic development in calves weaned conventionally or early. J Dairy Sci 1987, 70:1000-1005.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(87)80105-4Search in Google Scholar

12. Bryant M, Small N, Bouma C, Robinson, I: Studies on the composition of the ruminal flora and fauna of young calves. J Dairy Sci 1958, 41:1747-1767.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(58)91160-3Search in Google Scholar

13. Hungate R: The rumen and its microbes. New York, USA: Academic Press Inc, 1966, 533 p.Search in Google Scholar

14. Grilli D, Cerón M, Paez Lama S, Egea V, Schnittger L, Cravero S, Sosa Escudero M, Allegretti L, Arenas GN: Isolation of Pseudobutyrivibrio ruminis and Pseudobutyrivibrio xylanivorans from rumen of Creole goats fed native forage diet. Folia Microbiol 2013, 58:367-73.10.1007/s12223-012-0219-1Search in Google Scholar

15. Dehority BA, Grifo AP, Tirabasso PA, Fluharty FL: Relationship between rumen bacterial concentrations and total numbers. J Dairy Sci 1992, 75:3452-3454.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(92)78120-XSearch in Google Scholar

16. Tamate H: The anatomical studies of the stomach of the goat II. The post-natal changes in the capacities and the relative sizes of the four divisions of the stomach. J Agric Res 1957, 8:65-77.Search in Google Scholar

17. FASS. Federal of Animal Science Societies. Guide for the care and use of agricultural animals in research and teaching. Champaign, IL, USA. (3rd edition) 2010, 177 p.Search in Google Scholar

18. Hadjipanayiotou M, Louca A: The effects of partial suckling on the lactation performance of Chios sheep and Damascus goats and the growth rate of the lambs and kids. J Agric Sci 1976, 87:15-20.10.1017/S0021859600026526Search in Google Scholar

19. Lesmeister KE, Tozer PR, Heinrichs, AJ: Development and analysis of a rumen tissue sampling procedure. J Dairy Sci 2004, 87:1336-1344.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73283-XSearch in Google Scholar

20. InfoStat, 2011. FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.Search in Google Scholar

21. Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW: InfoStat versión 2011. Grupo InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina.Search in Google Scholar

22. Baldwin RL, Jesse BW: Developmental changes in glucose and butyrate metabolism by isolated sheep ruminal cells. J Nutr 1992, 122:1149-1153.10.1093/jn/122.5.1149Search in Google Scholar

23. Luo J, Sahlu T, Cameron M, Goetsch AL: Growth of Spanish, Boer × Angora, and Boer × Spanish goat kids fed milk replacer. Small Ruminant Res 2000, 36:189-194.10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00163-7Search in Google Scholar

24. Terré M, Devant M, Bach A: Effect of level of milk replacer fed to Holstein calves on performance during pre-weaning period and starter digestibility at weaning. Livest Sci 2007, 110:82-88.10.1016/j.livsci.2006.10.001Search in Google Scholar

25. Raeth-Knight M, Chester-Jones H, Hayes S, Linn J, Larson R, Ziegler D, Ziegler B, Broadwater N: Impact of conventional or intensive milk replacer programs on Holstein heifer performance through six months of age. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:799-809.10.3168/jds.2008-1470Search in Google Scholar

26. Goetsch AL, Detweiler G, Sahlu T, Dawson LJ: Effects of different management practices on preweaning and early postweaning growth of Alpine Kids. Small Ruminant Res 2001, 41:109-116.10.1016/S0921-4488(01)00207-3Search in Google Scholar

27. Ugur F, Savas T, Dosay M, Karabayır A, Atasoglu C: Growth and behavioral traits of Turkish Saanen kids weaned at 45 and 60 days. Small Ruminant Res 2004, 52:179-184.10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00253-0Search in Google Scholar

28. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2007, 362 p. Search in Google Scholar

29. Sanz Sampelayo MR, Allegretti L, Ruiz Mariscal I, Gil Extremera F, Boza J: Dietary factors affecting the maximum feed intake and the body composition of pre-ruminant kid goats of the Granadina breed British. J Nutr 1995, 74:335-345.10.1079/BJN19950139Search in Google Scholar

30. Paez Lama S, Egea V, Grilli D, Fucili M, Allegretti L, Guevara, JC: Growth and economic performance of kid production under different rearing systems and slaughter ages in arid areas of Argentina. Small Ruminant Res 2013, 110:9-14.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.08.005Search in Google Scholar

31. Morand-Fehr P, Hervieu J, Bas P, Sauvant D: Feeding of young goat. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Goat Production and Disease, Tucson, AZ. USA; 1982, 90-104.Search in Google Scholar

32. Yambayamba ESK, Price MA, Foxcroft GR: Hormonal status, metabolic changes, and resting metabolic rate in beef heifers undergoing compensatory growth. J Anim Sci 1996, 74:57-69.10.2527/1996.74157xSearch in Google Scholar

33. Hornick JL, Van Eenaeme C, Gerrard O, Dufrasne I, Istasse, L: Mechanisms of reduced and compensatory growth. Domest Anim Endocrin 2000, 19:121-132.10.1016/S0739-7240(00)00072-2Search in Google Scholar

34. Fluharty FL, Loerch SC, Turner TB, Moeller SJ, Lowe GD: Effects of weaning age and diet on growth and carcass characteristics in steers. J Anim Sci 2000, 78:1759-1767.10.2527/2000.7871759xSearch in Google Scholar

35. Sanz Sampelayo MR, Allegretti L, Gil Extremera F, Boza, J: Growth, body composition and energy utilisation in pre-ruminant goat kids: Effect of dry matter concentration in the milk replacer and animal age. Small Ruminant Res 2003, 49:61-67.10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00072-5Search in Google Scholar

36. Minato H, Otsuka M, Shirasaka S, Itabashi H, Mitsumori M: Colonization of microorganisms in the rumen of young calves. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1992, 38:447-456.10.2323/jgam.38.447Search in Google Scholar

37. Fonty G, Gouet Ph, Jouany JP, Senaud J: Establishment of the microflora and anaerobic fungi in the rumen of lambs. J Gen Microbiol 1987, 133:1835-1843.10.1099/00221287-133-7-1835Search in Google Scholar

38. Fonty G, Senaud J, Jouany JP, Gouet, Ph: Establishment of ciliate protozoa in the rumen of conventional and conventionalized lambs: influence of diet and management conditions. Can J Microbiol 1988, 34:235-241.10.1139/m88-0443138013Search in Google Scholar

39. Yang WZ, Beauchemin, KA: Increasing physically effective fiber content of dairy cow diets through forage proportion versus forage chop length: Chewing and ruminal pH. J Dairy Sci 2009, 92:1603-1615.10.3168/jds.2008-137919307642Search in Google Scholar

40. Ziolecki A, Briggs, CAE: The microflora of the rumen of the young calf: II Source, nature and development. J Appl Bacteriol 1961, 24:148-163.10.1111/j.1365-2672.1961.tb00247.xSearch in Google Scholar

41. Orskov ER: Protein Nutrition in Ruminants. New York, USA: Academic Press; 1992, 160 p.Search in Google Scholar

42. Poe SE, Ely DG, Mitchell Jr GE, Glimp HA, Deweese WP: Rumen development in lambs: II Rumen metabolite changes. J Animal Sci 1971, 32:989-993.10.2527/jas1971.325989x5571590Search in Google Scholar

43. Noro M, Sepúlveda P, Cárdenas F, Chihuailaf RH, Wittwer F: Rumenocentesis dorsomedial: un procedimiento seguro para la obtención de líquido ruminal en vacas lecheras a pastoreo. Arch Med Vet 2013, 45:25-31.10.4067/S0301-732X2013000100005Search in Google Scholar

44. Popović Z, Đorđević N, Đorđević M, Gruvić G, Stojanović, B: Estimation of the quality of the nutrition of roe deer based on chemical composition of the rumen content. Acta Vet-Beograd 2009, 59: 653-663.10.2298/AVB0906653PSearch in Google Scholar

45. Nsahlai IV, Goetsch AL, Luo J, Johnson ZB, Moore JE, Sahlu T, Ferrell CL, Galyean ML, Owens, FN: Metabolizable energy requirements of lactating goats Small Ruminant Res 2004, 53:253-273.10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.04.007Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo