1. bookVolume 65 (2015): Issue 2 (June 2015)
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
access type Open Access

Multiplication of the Enterocyte Mass by Serosal Patch Technique / Umnožavanje Enterocitne Mase Tehnikom Seroznog Patch-A

Published Online: 23 Jun 2015
Volume & Issue: Volume 65 (2015) - Issue 2 (June 2015)
Page range: 162 - 174
Received: 29 Sep 2014
Accepted: 03 Mar 2015
Journal Details
License
Format
Journal
eISSN
1820-7448
First Published
25 Mar 2014
Publication timeframe
4 times per year
Languages
English
Abstract

Damage to the small intestine and impairment of the intestinal epithelium occur in various diseases, resulting in a need for new epithelium. Therefore, bioengineering of the small intestine is becoming an attractive field of research where all contributions are highly appreciated.

The purpose of this study was to determine the possibility of the multiplication of the enterocyte mass using the technique of serosal patch with the application of hematopoietic stem cells, as well as the assessment of the quality of newly formed mucosa.

Sixty Mill Hill hooded rats were divided in 4 groups, 15 animals each. In the control group animals, the patch was not created. In the other three groups, the animals were operated on and in each group 8 parietal and 7 visceral patches have been created. One of the groups with operated animals (Group NS) was not postoperatively treated. The second group of operated animals (Group G) was stimulated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). The third group of operated animals (Group GM) was stimulated with recombined humane granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rHuGM-CSF).

In the group of animals that were not stimulated, epithelium proliferated slowly. In the group of animals stimulated with G-CSF stimulants, the epithelium initially proliferated rapidly, but appeared atrophic after eight weeks. Stimulation by rHuGM-CSF led to faster epithelization, and epithelium showed signs of advancing proliferation after eight weeks.

We confirmed the possibility of enterocyte mass multiplication by using the serosal patch technique, as well as that stimulation with rHuGM-CSF is more effective than stimulation with G-CSF.

Keywords

1. Orlando G, Garcia-Arraras JE, Soker T, Booth C, Sanders B, Ross CL, Coppi PD, Farney AC, Rogers J, Stratta RJ: Regeneration and bioengineering of the gastrointestinal tract: Current status and future perspectives. Digest Liver Dis 2012, 44:714-720.10.1016/j.dld.2012.04.005Search in Google Scholar

2. Chen MK, Beierle EA: Animal models for intestinal tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004, 25:1675-1681.10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00517-9Search in Google Scholar

3. Greca FH, Noronha L, Marcolini FRN, Verona A, Pereira IA, Bier RS: Small intestinal submucosa as a graft to increase rectum diameter. J Surg Res 2013, 183:503-508.10.1016/j.jss.2013.01.059Search in Google Scholar

4. Maemura T, Shin M, Kinoshita M: Tissue engineering of the stomach. J Surg Res 2013, 183:285-295.10.1016/j.jss.2013.02.032Search in Google Scholar

5. Wulkersdorfer B, Kao KK, Agopian VG, Dunn JC, Wu BM, Stelzner M: Growth factors adsorbed on polyglycolic acid mesh augment growth of bioengineered intestinal neomucosa. J Surg Res 2011, 169:169-178.10.1016/j.jss.2009.11.719Search in Google Scholar

6. Grebeldinger S, Marinković S: Short bowel syndrome-surgical aspects. Med Pregl 1998, 51(9-10):405-409.Search in Google Scholar

7. Kucuk C, Ozkan M, Akgun H, Muhtaroglu S, Sozuer E: The effect of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on bacterial translocation after administration of 5-fl uorouracil in rats. J Surg Res 2005, 128:15-20.10.1016/j.jss.2005.04.037Search in Google Scholar

8. Zylinska K, Komorowski J, Robak T, Mucha S, Stepien H: Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and granulocyte colony stimulating factor on melatonin secretion in rats in vivo and in vitro studies. J Neuroimmunol 1995,56:187-190.10.1016/0165-5728(94)00146-FSearch in Google Scholar

9. Rowland KJ, Choi PM, Warner BW: The role of growth factors in intestinal regeneration and repair in necrotizing enterocolotis. Semin Pediatr Surg 2013, 22:101-111.10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2013.01.007Search in Google Scholar

10. Benboubker L, Cartron G, Roingeard F, Delain M, Degenne M, Linassier C, Herault O, Truglio D, Bout M, Petiti A, Bremond JL, Desbois I, Colombat P, Binet C, Domenech J: Long-term marrow reconstitutive ability of autologous grafts in lymphoma patients using peripheral blood mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or granulocyte -macrophage colony-stimulating factor compared to bone marrow. Exp Hematol 2003, 31:89-97.10.1016/S0301-472X(02)01007-XSearch in Google Scholar

11. Wang ZQ, Watanabe Y, Toki A: Experimental assessment of small intestinal submucosa as a small bowel graft in a rat model. J Pediatr Surg 2003; 38(11): 1596-1601.10.1016/S0022-3468(03)00567-0Search in Google Scholar

12. Chang PCY, Mendoza J, Park J, Lam MM, Wu B, Atkinson JB, Dunn JCY: Sustainability of mechanically lengthened bowel in rats. J Pediatr Surg 2006, 41:2019-2022.10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.08.014Search in Google Scholar

13. Jones BA, Hull MA, McGuire MM, Kim HB: Autologous intestinal reconstruction surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg 2010, 19(1):59-67.10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2009.11.007Search in Google Scholar

14. Grebeldinger S, Marinković S, Belopavlović J: Rapid adaptation response after extensive resection of the small intestine: case report. Med Pregl 1999, 52(1-2): 67-70.Search in Google Scholar

15. Binnington HB, Siegel BA, Kissane JM, Ternberg JL: A technique to increase jejunal mucosa surface area. J Pediatr Surg 1973, 8:765-769.10.1016/0022-3468(73)90419-3Search in Google Scholar

16. Binnington HB, Sumner H, Lesker P, Alpers D, Ternberg JL: Functional characteristics of surgically induced jejunal neomucosa. Surgery 1974, 75:805-810.Search in Google Scholar

17. Erez I, Rode H, Cywes S: Enteroperitoneal anastomosis for short bowel syndrome. Harefuah 1992, 123:5-8.Search in Google Scholar

18. Thompson JS, Vanderhoof JA, Davis SJ, Grandjean CJ: Effect of intestinal location on growth and function of neomucosa. J Surg Res 1985, 39:68-75.10.1016/0022-4804(85)90163-5Search in Google Scholar

19. Vojvodic D, Miljanovic O, Djurdjevic D, Gataric S, Stanojevic I, Obradovic D, Surbatovic M, Francuski J: Effects of different anesthetic agents on GM-CSF, MCP1, IL1 and TNF levels in rat sepsis model. Acta Vet-Beograd 2013, 63(2-3):125-136.10.2298/AVB1303125VSearch in Google Scholar

20. Genter A, Capak H, Lipar M, Samadžija M, Harapin I, Bedrica Lj, Capak D: Antimicrobial prophylaxis in addition to premedication in gastrointestinal surgery. Acta Vet-Beograd 2014, 64(1):149-155.10.2478/acve-2014-0015Search in Google Scholar

21. Wright NA, Goodlad RA: Epithelial kinetics; control and consequences of alteration in disease. In Gastrointestinal and Oesophageal Pathology. Whitehead R (ed). Churchill Livingstone, New York 1995, 106-107. Search in Google Scholar

Recommended articles from Trend MD

Plan your remote conference with Sciendo