[
Beck, U., A. Giddens A. and S. Lash 1994 Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, London: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berger, P. L. and T. Luckmann 1967 The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, London: Allen Lane, Penguin.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bezemer, D. J. 2002a ‘Credit markets for agriculture in the Czech Republic’ Europe-Asia Studies 54: 1301–1317, doi: 10.1080/0966813022000025899.10.1080/0966813022000025899
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bika, Z. 2007 ‘The territorial impact of the farmers’ early retirement scheme’ Sociologia Ruralis 47: 246–272, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00436.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2007.00436.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bláha, A. I. 1925 Sociologie sedláka a dělníka: příspěvek k sociologii společenských vrstev, V Praze: Orbis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brandth, B. and G. Overrein 2013 ‘Resourcing Children in a Changing Rural Context: Fathering and Farm Succession in Two Generations of Farmers’ Sociologia Ruralis 53: 95–111, doi: 10.1111/soru.1200310.1111/soru.12003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Calus, M., Van Huylenbroeck, G. and D. Van Lierde 2008 ‘The relationship between farm succession and farm assets on Belgian farms’ Sociologia Ruralis 48: 38–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00448.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00448.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chiswell, H. M. 2016 ‘From Generation to Generation: Changing Dimensions of Intergenerational Farm Transfer’ Sociologia Ruralis 58(1): 104–125, doi: 10.1111/soru.12138.10.1111/soru.12138
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CZSO 2016 Regions – Yearbooks, https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/regional-year-books (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Duesberg, S., Bogue, P. and A. Renwick 2017 ‘Retirement farming or sustainable growth – land transfer choices for farmers without a successor’ Land Use Policy 61: 526–535, doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.007.10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dumas, C., Dupuis, J. P. and R.F. St.-Cyr. 1995 ‘Factors that influence the next generation’s decision to take over the family farm’ Family Business Review 8: 99–120.10.1111/j.1741-6248.1995.00099.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EC 2012 Generational Renewal in EU Agriculture: StatisticalBackground. EU Agricultural Economic Briefs No 6, June 2012, http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/rural-area-economics/briefs/pdf/06_en.pdf (13.032017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EC. 2013 Overview of the CAP Reform 2014–2020. Agricultural Policy Perspectives Brief DG Agriculture and Rural Development. http://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/agriculture/files/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05_en.pdf (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
EP 2014 CAP 2014–2020 Tools to Enhance Family Farming: Opportunities and Limits, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/note/join/2014/529051/IPOL-AGRI_NT(2014)529051_EN.pdf (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Errington, A. 2002 Handing Over the Reins: A Comparative Study of Intergenerational Farm Transfers in England, France and Canada’. Paper prepared for presentation at the X th EAAE Congress ‘Exploring Diversity in the European Agri-Food System’, Zaragoza (Spain), 28–31 August 2002.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat 2015a Farm Structure. Reference Metadata, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/cache/metadata/en/ef_esms.htm#unit_measure1476277716505 (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eurostat 2015b Farm Structure Statistics, http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Farm_structure_statistics (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, H. and R. J. F. Burton 2014 ‘Understanding Farm Succession as Socially Constructed Endogenous Cycles’ Sociologia Ruralis 54: 417–438, doi: 10.1111/soru.12055.10.1111/soru.12055
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Galla, K. and F. Udržal 1939 Dolní Roveň: sociologický obraz české vesnice. Praha: Spolek péče o blaho venkova.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gasson, R. and A. J. Errington 1993 The farm family business: CAB International.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haan, H. 1994 In the shadow of the tree: kinship, property, and inheritance among farm families. Thesis – Landbouwuniversiteit, Wageningen.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hudečková, H. 2004 ‘Dekolektivizace a rodinná tradice v zemědělském hospodaření’ in: J. Kandert (ed.) Jihomoravský venkov po socialism, Praha: Matfyzpress, pp. 258–280
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hudečková, H. and M. Lošťák 1995b ‘Social Cost of Transformation in the Czech Agriculture’ Eastern European Countryside 1: 81–90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hudečková, H. and M. Lošťák 1995a ‘Rozličné životaschopné modely a strategie pro český venkov’ Zemědělská ekonomika 41(10–11): 477–480.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hudečková, H. 1995 ‘Privatization in agriculture and rural regeneration’ Sociologicky Casopis 31: 449–462.10.13060/00380288.1995.31.4.04
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hudečková, H. and M. Lošťák 1992 ‘Privatization in Czechoslovak Agriculture. Results of a 1990 Sociological Survey’ Sociologia Ruralis 32(2–3): 287–304.10.1111/j.1467-9523.1992.tb00933.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hurtíková, I. 1996 Agrocenzus 1995: 1. část, Základní ukazatele za Českou republiku, Praha: Český statistický úřad.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hutson, J. 1987 ‘Fathers and sons – Family farms, Family Businesses and the Farming Industry’ Sociology-the Journal of the British Sociological Association 21: 215–229, doi: 10.1177/0038038587021002004.10.1177/0038038587021002004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keating, N. C. and B. Munro 1989 ‘Transferring the Family Farm – Process and Implications’ Family Relations 38: 215–218. doi: 10.2307/583678.10.2307/583678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keating, N. C. and H. M. Little 1994 ‘Getting into it – Farm Roles and Careers of New-Zeland Women’ Rural Sociology 59: 720–736.10.1111/j.1549-0831.1994.tb00557.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lobley, M., Baker, J. R. and I. Whitehead 2010 ‘Farm succession and retirement: some international comparisons’ Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development 1: 49–64.10.5304/jafscd.2010.011.009
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lošťák, M. 2004 ‘Proměny soudobého zemědělství (loklální a nadloklální v podobě českého zemědělství a v proměnách jeho podniků’ in: J. Kandert (ed.) Jihomoravský venkov po socialism, Praha: Matfyzpress, pp. 177–198.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lošťák, M., Hudečková, H. and S. Rikoon 1999 ‘Land Ownership and the Challenge of “Late Modernity” (New Institutional Settings and Behaviour of Czech Landowners)’ Zemědělská ekonomika 45 (11): 481–490.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majerová, V. 1993 ‘Reconstitution of private farm family households in the Czech Republic’ in: J. Cécora (ed.) Economic Behaviour of Family Households in an International Context (Resource Income and Allocation in Urban and Rural, in Farm and Nonfarm Households), Bonn: Society for Agricultural Policy Research and Rural Sociology e.V., pp. 100–108.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Majerová, V. 1991 ‘Pracovní síly v období transformace zemědělských podniků’ Sociologie zemědělství 27(2): 103–107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mann, S. 2007 ‘Tracing the process of becoming a farm successor on Swiss family farms’ Agriculture and Human Values 24: 435–443, doi: 10.1007/s10460-007-9087-8.10.1007/s10460-007-9087-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Matthews, A. 2013 Wasting money on young farmers?, http://www.iiea.com/blogosphere/wasting-money-on-young-farmers (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maurell, M-C. 1998 ‘Decollectivization Paths in Central Europe: Towards Which New Models?’ Eastern European Countryside 4: 19–36, http://www.eec.umk.pl/issues/eec-no-41998/ (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Meurs, M. 2001 The evolution of agrarian institutions: a comparative study of post-socialist Hungary and Bulgaria, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.10.3998/mpub.23026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MZe. 2016 Výroční zpráva o implementaci Programu rozvoje venkova ČR 2007–2013, http://eagri.cz/public/web/file/505515/VZ_2015.pdf (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
North, D.C. 1990 Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pospěch, P. 2014 ‘Discursive no man’s land: Analysing the discourse of the rural in the transitional Czech Republic’ Journal of Rural Studies 34: 96–107.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.01.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potter, C. and M. Lobley 1992 ‘The Conservations Status and potential of Elderly Farmers – results from a Survey in England and Wales’ Journal of Rural Studies 8: 133–143, doi: 10.1016/0743-0167(92)90072-e.10.1016/0743-0167(92)90072-E
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Potter, C. and M. Lobley 1996 ‘Unbroken threads? Succession and its effects on family farms in Britain’ Sociologia Ruralis 36: 286–&, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00023.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.1996.tb00023.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riley, M. 2014 ‘Interviewing fathers and sons together: Exploring the potential of joint interviews for research on family farms’ Journal of Rural Studies 36: 237–246, doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.09.003.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.09.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sottomayor, M., Tranter R. and L. Costa 2011 ‘‘Likelihood of succession and farmers’ attitudes towards their future behaviour: evidence from a survey in Germany, the United Kingdom and Portugal’ International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 18: 121–133.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silvasti, T. 2003 ‘The cultural model of “the good farmer” and the environmental question in Finland’ Agriculture and Human Values 20(2): 143–150.10.1023/A:1024021811419
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swain, N. 2014 ‘The Village and the Class War: Anti-Kulak Campaign in Estonia’ American Historical Review 119: 637–637, doi: 10.1093/ahr/119.2.637.10.1093/ahr/119.2.637
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swain, N. 2013 Green Barons, Force-of-Circumstance Entrepreneures, Impotent Mayors (Rural Change in the Early Years of Post-Socialist Capitalist Democracy, Budapest: Central European University Press.10.1515/9786155225710
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swain, N. 2007 ‘Decollectivization politics and rural change in Bulgaria, Poland and the former Czechoslovakia’ Social History 32: 1–26.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Swain, N. 1999 ‘Agricultural Restitution and Co-operative Transformation in the Czech Republic, Hungary and Slovakia’ Europe-Asia Studies 51(7): 1199–1219.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Szelényi, S., Szelényi, I. And I. Kovách 1995 ‘The making of the Hungarian postcommunist elite: Circulation in politics, reproduction in the economy’ Theory and Society 24: 697–722.10.1007/BF00993403
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, J. E., Norris J. E. and W. H. Howard 1998 ‘Succession patterns of farmer and successor in Canadian farm families’ Rural Sociology 63: 553–573.10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00692.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Villa, M. 1999 ‘Born to be farmers? Changing expectations in Norwegian farmers’ life courses’ Sociologia Ruralis 39: 328–342, doi: 10.1111/1467-9523.00111.10.1111/1467-9523.00111
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zagata, L. and L. A. Sutherland 2015 ‘Deconstructing the ‘young farmer problem in Europe’: Towards a research agenda’ Journal of Rural Studies 38: 39–51, doi: 10.1016/jjrurstud.2015.01.003.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zemědělec 2012 Jednodušší podmínky pro předávání farem/Simplifying requirements for farm succession, http://zemedelec.cz/jednodussi-podminky-pro--predavani-farem/ (13.04.2017).
]Search in Google Scholar
