Login
Register
Reset Password
Publish & Distribute
Publishing Solutions
Distribution Solutions
Subjects
Architecture and Design
Arts
Business and Economics
Chemistry
Classical and Ancient Near Eastern Studies
Computer Sciences
Cultural Studies
Engineering
General Interest
Geosciences
History
Industrial Chemistry
Jewish Studies
Law
Library and Information Science, Book Studies
Life Sciences
Linguistics and Semiotics
Literary Studies
Materials Sciences
Mathematics
Medicine
Music
Pharmacy
Philosophy
Physics
Social Sciences
Sports and Recreation
Theology and Religion
Publications
Journals
Books
Proceedings
Publishers
Blog
Contact
Search
EUR
USD
GBP
English
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Cart
Home
Journals
Journal of Social Structure
Volume 25 (2024): Issue 1 (January 2024)
Open Access
An Analysis of Correlation and Comparisons Between Centrality Measures in Network Models
Javad Mohamadichamgavi
Javad Mohamadichamgavi
,
Mahdi Hajihashemi
Mahdi Hajihashemi
and
Keivan Aghababaei Samani
Keivan Aghababaei Samani
| Jan 20, 2024
Journal of Social Structure
Volume 25 (2024): Issue 1 (January 2024)
About this article
Previous Article
Next Article
Abstract
Article
Figures & Tables
References
Authors
Articles in this Issue
Preview
PDF
Cite
Share
Published Online:
Jan 20, 2024
Page range:
1 - 21
DOI:
https://doi.org/10-21307/joss-2024-001
Keywords
network models
,
centrality measures
,
Pearson correlation
,
Spearman correlation
© 2024 Javad Mohamadichamgavi et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Figure 1.
Correlations between centrality measures in ER network with size of 500 as a function of $p$. (a) Pearson correlation (b) Spearman correlation.
Figure 2.
Correlations between centrality measures in ER network with connection probability p=0.1 as a function of size of network. (a) Pearson correlation (b) Spearman correlation.
Figure 3.
Correlations between centrality measures in BA network N=500 as a function of m (2m is average degree). (a) Pearson correlation (b) Spearman correlation.
Figure 4.
Correlations between centrality measures in BA network m=1 as a function of N (network size).(a) Pearson correlation (b) Spearman correlation.
Figure 5.
Correlations between centrality measures in SW network with N=400 as a function of k (average degree). The rewiring probability is constant pWS=0.3. (a) Pearson correlation (b) Spearman correlation.
Figure 6.
Correlations between centrality measures in SW network with k=2 as a function of N (network size). The rewiring probability is constant pWS=0.3. (a) Pearson correlation (b) Spearman correlation.
Figure 7.
Correlations between centrality measures in SW network N=400 as a function of pWS (rewiring probability). The average degree is constant 10. (a) Pearson correlation (b) Spearman correlation.
Figure 8.
(Color online) The effect of global topological properties of network models on average Pearson correlation of centralities. The dots represent the average of six pairs of correlation between measures for a network with random parameters. Red is ER, Blue is BA, and Green is SW network.
Figure 9.
(Color online) The effect of global topological properties of network models on average Spearman correlation of centralities. The dots represent the average of six pairs of correlation between measures for a network with random parameters. Red is ER, Blue is BA, and Green is SW network.
Figure 10.
(Color online) The effect of construction parameters of network models on global topological properties of networks. Red is ER, Blue is BA, and Green is SW network.
Preview