<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This corpus-based study focuses on the graphemic realisations of several derivational suffixes in thirteen editions of the Kalender of Shepherdes, an early modern almanac published between 1506 and 1656. Morphological spelling, that is, the consistent representation of particular morphemes, is considered to be one of the most important criteria in research on the orthographic standardisation in English. The analysis of the graphomorphemic information available in the documents under consideration indicates that particular printing houses applied different combinations of spelling rules with regard to the variants of suffixes and were characterised by varying levels of consistency in the use of these graphemic representations. The new spelling variants of the suffixes were adopted partly as the printers’ own regularisation policy, and partly under the influence of normative writings.</abstract>

Towards Regularisation: Morphological Spelling in Several Editions of the Kalender of Shepherdes

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Semantic change is an important part of African American slang and involves two mechanisms: figuration and shifting. Both are enormously productive and account for numerous slang expressions based on standard English. This paper presents these processes in detail. Partially drawing from the author’s earlier publications, the presentation is based on lexical material from a sizable database of citations from contemporary African American sources collected through extensive fieldwork in the United States in recent years.</abstract>

Semantic Change in African American Slang

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> Although “Wakefield” opens as a leisurely mnemonic act, it turns into an intensely emotional affair. However, the stance of moral indignation and, indeed, condemnation adopted in many readings of this classic tale seems to be a monological trap, an interpretive ride along Einbahnstrasse. The present close re-reading draws on the combined appreciation of perversity as (i) formal figuration in which the bearings of the original are reversed, (ii) attitudinal disposition to proceed against the weight of evidence (the so-called ‘being stubborn in error’). Building on this logic, the paper offers a transcriptive anti-type response to Hawthorne’s title. It is meant as a detour of understanding and a reclamation of a seemingly obvious relational and denotative proposition. Inasmuch as “Wakefield” is a distinctive rhetorical performance, foundationally a story about story-telling, its title can be naturalized as identifying the story-teller. Even if this does not come across as lucius ordo, it is argued that the order of reappropriative and be-longing signification is that of Mrs. rather than - as is commonly believed - that of Mr. Wakefield. Informed by object permanence and a peculiar looking bias, “Wakefield” proves to be her-tale rather than his-story. As a secret sharer and a would be-speaking gaze, the wife turns out to be a structural and existential pivot of the narrative. More broadly, Mrs. Wakefield can be appreciated as coarticulator of a ventriloquistic logos and choreographer of a telescopic parallactic vision. Unintentional challenge to both the heresy of paraphrase and the aesthetics of astonishment, this is ultimately to proffer a radical Shakespearean/Kantian re-cognition that in certain spheres there obtains nothing absolutely ‘moral’ or ‘immoral’, and it is only a particular perspectival discourse that may make it so.</abstract>

Hawthorne’s Perspectival Perversity: What if “Wakefield” Were (About) a Woman?; or, Credo Quia Absurdum

<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> This article seeks to explore representations of theatrical anger in William Shakespeare and Thomas Middleton’s Timon of Athens (1606?) and a play written by students from one of the Inns of Court, the Inner Temple, entitled Timon, written and performed at the Inn circa 1602. The article is concerned with two types of violence exhibited in both plays; rhetorical violence and ritualistic violence. Early modern rhetorical violence is self-consciously performative and manipulative compared to ritualistic violence which is unbridled and emasculating; a bodily performance that cannot be controlled via self-regulation. By exploring cultural perceptions of anger, this article attempts to account for the range of violence performed by the two Timons.</abstract>

Timon of Athens (1606?) and Timon (1602?): Rhetorical and Ritualistic Violence

AHEAD OF PRINT

Volume 58 (2023): Issue 1 (January 2023)

Volume 57 (2022): Issue 1 (January 2022)

Volume 56 (2021): Issue s1 (December 2021)

Volume 56 (2021): Issue 1 (December 2021)

Volume 55 (2020): Issue s2 (December 2020) Special issue: Dialogues, reinterpretations, critical repositionings in literary and cultural discourses of 21st century Canada

Volume 55 (2020): Issue s1 (December 2020) Special Issue: Multimodal Patterns in Cognition and Communication

Volume 55 (2020): Issue 1 (March 2020)

Volume 54 (2019): Issue s1 (December 2019) Special issue on Change from above in the history of English. Edited by Nikolaos Lavidas

Volume 54 (2019): Issue 1 (March 2019)

Volume 53 (2018): Issue 1 (March 2018)

Volume 53 (2018): Issue s1 (December 2018) Special issue on Native American indigenous studies

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 4 (December 2017)

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 3 (December 2017)

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 2 (December 2017)

Volume 52 (2017): Issue 1 (March 2017)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 4 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 3 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 2 (December 2016)

Volume 51 (2016): Issue 1 (March 2016)

Volume 50 (2015): Issue 4 (December 2015)

Volume 50 (2015): Issue 2-3 (December 2015)

Volume 50 (2015): Issue 1 (March 2015)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 4 (December 2014)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 3 (December 2014)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 2 (June 2014)

Volume 49 (2014): Issue 1 (March 2014)

Volume 48 (2013): Issue 4 (December 2013)

Volume 48 (2013): Issue 2-3 (December 2013)

Volume 48 (2013): Issue 1 (June 2013)

Volume 47 (2012): Issue 4 (December 2012)

Volume 47 (2012): Issue 2-3 (June 2012)

Volume 47 (2012): Issue 1 (April 2012)

Volume 46 (2011): Issue 4 (January 2011)

Volume 46 (2011): Issue 3 (June 2011)

Volume 46 (2010): Issue 2 (January 2010)

Volume 46 (2010): Issue 1 (January 2010)

Volume 45 (2009): Issue 2 (January 2009)

Volume 45 (2009): Issue 1 (June 2009)

Studia Anglica Posnaniensia

 Studia Anglica Posnaniensia: An international Review of English Studies, was established in 1968 by the eminent Polish anglicist Jacek Fisiak and has been published continuously ever since by Adam Mickiewicz University Poznañ (Faculty of English). It is devoted to publishing high-quality research in English linguistics, literatures in English, and broadly understood culture of anglophone countries. It carries original studies in all the above areas, both devoted solely to English and those of a comparative natures, as well as book reviews and thematic issues. New contributions appear continuously throughout the year on the online-first basis, while the yearbook is closed and printed in late December. The primary mode of publication is on-line, with printed copies reserved in principle for the authors alone. The journal welcomes contributions on all aspects on English studies as defined above, theoretical as well as applied. The language of the journal is English. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia is a Gold Open Access journal and as such it does not have any article processing charges (APCs) nor article submission charges. Rejection Rate   65%   Archiving  Sciendo archives the contents of this journal in Portico - digital long-term preservation service of scholarly books, journals and collections.  Plagiarism Policy  The editorial board is participating in a growing community of Similarity Check System's users in order to ensure that the content published is original and trustworthy. Similarity Check is a medium that allows for comprehensive manuscripts screening, aimed to eliminate plagiarism and provide a high standard and quality peer-review process. 