[
Allen, J. (2003). Lost Geographies of Power. London: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470773321
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2000). Reflexive Methodology. New Vistas for Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Anastasi, C. (2018). Strategic Stakeholder Engagement. Oxon: Routledge.10.4324/9781315101453
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194436690897722510.1080/01944366908977225
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.10.2307/j.ctv12101zq
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonney, R., et al. (200). Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. Washington: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bouchard, N. (2016). The dark side of public participation: participative processes that legitimize elected officials’ values. Canadian Public Administration Publique du Canada, 59(4), 516-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.1219910.1111/capa.12199
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brackmann, S. M. (2015). Community engagement in a neoliberal paradigm. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 19(4), 115–146.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brouwer, H., Woodhill, J., Hemmati, M., Verhoosel, K., & van Vugt, S. (2016). The MSP Guide, How to Design and Facilitate Multi-stakeholder Partnerships. Wageningen: Wageningen University and Research, CDI, and Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.10.3362/9781780446691
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruner, J. (1993). The autobiographical process. In R. Folkenflik (Ed.), The Culture of Autobiography: Constructions of Self-Representation (pp. 38–56). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. (2011). Media and Participation. A Site of Ideological-Democratic Struggle. Bristol: Intellect.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. (2015). Differentiating between access, interaction and participation. Conjunctions: Transdisciplinary Journal of Cultural Participation, 2(2), 7-28. https://doi.org/10.7146/tjcp.v2i2.2311710.7146/tjcp.v2i2.23117
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the ladder of participation: An analytical toolkit for the critical analysis of participatory media processes. Javnost - The Public, 23(1), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2016.114976010.1080/13183222.2016.1149760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carpentier, N., & De Cleen, B. (2007). Bringing discourse theory into media studies: The applicability of discourse theoretical analysis (DTA) for the study of media practises and discourses. Journal of Language and Politics, 6(2), 265–293.10.1075/jlp.6.2.08car
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chauke, W. (2016). Community Mobilization and Stakeholder Participation for Development. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chambers, R. (1994). The origins and practice of participatory rural appraisal. World Development, 22(7), 953–969. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-410.1016/0305-750X(94)90141-4
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analysing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92-117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.950327199410.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (Eds.). (2001). Participation: The New Tyranny?. London: Zed.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornwall, A. (2004). Spaces for transformation? Reflections on issues of power and difference in participation in development. In S. Hickey & G. Mohan (Eds.), Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development (pp. 75–91). London: Zed.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cornwall, A., & Jewkes, R. (1995). What is participatory research? Social Science and Medicine, 41(12), 1667–1676. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S10.1016/0277-9536(95)00127-S
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dahl, R. A. (1968). Power. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (vol. 12, pp. 405-415). New York: Crowell, Collier and Macmillan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dickinson, J. L., & Bonney, R. E. Jr. (Eds.) (2012). Citizen Science: Public Participation in Environmental Research. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.10.7591/cornell/9780801449116.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, C. (2004). The Ethnographic I: A Methodological Novel about Autoethnography. Walnut Creek: AltaMira Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1). http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1589/3095
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Endres, D., Sprain, L., & Peterson, T. R. (2009). Social Movement to Address Climate Change: Local Steps for Global Action. Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fals Borda, O. (2006). The north-south convergence: a 30-year first-person assessment of PAR. Action Research, 4(3), 351–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/147675030606680610.1177/1476750306066806
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fals Borda, O., & Rahman, M. A. (Eds.). (1991). Action and Knowledge. Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action-Research. New York: Apex Press.10.3362/9781780444239
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality: An Introduction, volume I. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139192675
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freire, P. (2018/1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Green, A. O., & Hunton-Clarke, L. (2003). A typology of stakeholder participation for company environmental decision-making. Business strategy and the environment, 12(5), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.37110.1002/bse.371
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haraway, D. J. (1988). Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575-599. http://www.jstor.org/stable/317806610.2307/3178066
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Holloway, G. (2017). Stakeholder Management. New Worlds for Old Ideas. Xlibris.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joosse, S., Powell, S., Hanna Bergeå, H., Böhm, S., Calderón, C., … Westin, M. (2020). Critical, engaged and change- oriented scholarship in environmental communication. Six methodological dilemmas to think with. Environmental Communication, 14:6, 758-771. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.172558810.1080/17524032.2020.1725588
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jupp, E. (2007). Participation, local knowledge and empowerment: researching public space with young people. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(12), 2832-2844. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3820410.1068/a38204
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Singapore: Springer.10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kesby, M., Kindon, S., & Pain, R. (2010). Participation as a form of power. Retheorising empowerment and spatialising Participatory Action Research. In S. Kindon, R. Pain, & M. Kesby (Eds.), Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods (pp. 19-25). London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kindon, S., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (Eds). (2010). Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lang, D. J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., … Thomas, C. J. (2012). Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: Practice, principles, and challenges. Sustainability Science, 7(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lerner, D. (1962). The Passing of Traditional Society (2nd ed.). Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maréchal, G. (2010). Autoethnography. In A. J. Mills, G. Durepos & E. Wiebe (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Case Study Research (vol. 2, pp. 43–45). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miessen, M. (2010). The Nightmare of Participation. Berlin: Sternberg Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mody, B. (1988). From communication effects to communication contexts. Media Development, 3, 35-37.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mouffe, C. (2005). The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Parsons, T. (1967). Sociological Theory and Modern Society. New York: Free Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pohl, C. Rist, S., Zimmermann, A., Fry, P., Gurung, G. S., …. Wiesmann, U. (2010). Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: Experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Science and Public Policy, 37(4), 267–281. https://core.ac.uk/reader/8521207410.3152/030234210X496628
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raphael, C. (2019). Engaged communication scholarship for environmental justice: A research agenda. Environmental Communication, 13(8), 1087–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.159147810.1080/17524032.2019.1591478
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of Action Research: Concise Paperback Edition. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305-320. https://doi.org/10.1191/03091329767330212210.1191/030913297673302122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Russell, B. (2015). Beyond activism/academia: militant research and the radical climate and climate justice movement (s). Area, 47(3): 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.1208610.1111/area.12086
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruth, D. (2008). Being an academic: authorship, authenticity and authority. London Review of Education, 6(2), 99-109.10.1080/14748460802184998
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saldaña, J. (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. London: Sage.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scharioth, J., & Huber, M. (Eds.). (2008). Achieving Excellence in Stakeholder Management. Berlin: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schramm, W. (1964). Mass Media and National Development. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Servaes, J. (1999). Communication for Development. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Servaes, J., & Liu, S. (Eds). (2007). Moving Targets: Mapping the Paths Between Communication Technology and Social Change in Communities. Penang: Southbound.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Statzel, S. 2008. Cybersupremacy: The new face and form of white supremacist activism. In M. Boler (Ed.), Digital Media and Democracy. Tactics in Hard Times (pp. 405-428). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis: In Search of Meaning. London: Sage.10.4135/9780857024480
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Voorberg, W., Bekkers, V., & Tummers, L. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.93050510.1080/14719037.2014.930505
]Search in Google Scholar