1. bookVolume 8 (2014): Edizione 4 (August 2014)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1875-855X
Prima pubblicazione
01 Jun 2007
Frequenza di pubblicazione
6 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: comparison between National Diabetes Data Group and Carpenter– Coustan criteria

Pubblicato online: 04 Feb 2017
Volume & Edizione: Volume 8 (2014) - Edizione 4 (August 2014)
Pagine: 505 - 509
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1875-855X
Prima pubblicazione
01 Jun 2007
Frequenza di pubblicazione
6 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

1. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus (Position Statement). Diabetes Care. 2009; 32(Suppl 1):S62-7.10.2337/dc09-S062Search in Google Scholar

2. Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997; 20:1183-97.920346010.2337/diacare.20.7.1183Search in Google Scholar

3. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion number 504: Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118:751-3.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182310cc3Search in Google Scholar

4. International Association of Diabetes in Pregnancy Groups Consensus Panel. International association of diabetes and pregnancy study groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33:676-82.2019029610.2337/dc09-1848Search in Google Scholar

5. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes. 1979; 28:1039-57.51080310.2337/diab.28.12.1039Search in Google Scholar

6. Carpenter MW, Coustan DR. Criteria for screening tests for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982; 144:768-73.10.1016/0002-9378(82)90349-0Search in Google Scholar

7. Ferrara A, Hedderson MM, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus detected by the National Diabetes Data Group or the Carpenter and Coustan plasma glucose thresholds. Diabetes Care. 2002; 25:1625-30.10.2337/diacare.25.9.162512196438Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Ricart W, Lopez J, Mozas J, Pericot A, Sancho MA, Gonzalez N, et al. Potential impact of American Diabetes Association (2000) criteria for diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus in Spain. Diabetologia. 2005; 48:1135-41.10.1007/s00125-005-1756-915889233Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Cheng YW, Block-Kurbisch I, Caughey AB. Carpenter-Coustan criteria compared with the National Diabetes Data Group thresholds for gestational diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114:326-32.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ae8d8519622994Search in Google Scholar

10. Karcaaltincaba D, Kandemir O, Yalvac S, Guvendag-Guven S, Haberal A. Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational impaired glucose tolerance in pregnant women evaluated by National Diabetes Data Group and Carpenter and Coustan criteria. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 106:246-9.10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.04.00419464683Search in Google Scholar

11. Chou CY, Lin CL, Yang CK, Yang WC, Lee FK, Tsai MS. Pregnancy outcomes of Taiwanese women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a comparison of Carpenter-Coustan and National Diabetes Data Group criteria. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010; 19:935-9.10.1089/jwh.2009.162020370431Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Berggren EK, Boggess KA, Stuebe AM, Jonsson Funk M. National Diabetes Data Group vs Carpenter-Coustan criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 205:253.e1-7.10.1016/j.ajog.2011.06.026367095722071053Search in Google Scholar

13. Sunsaneevithayakul P, Boriboonhirunsarn D, Sutanthavibul A, Ruangvutilert P, Kanokpongsakdi S, Singkiratana D, et al. Risk factor-based selective screening program for gestational diabetes mellitus in Siriraj Hospital: result from clinical practice guideline. J Med Assoc Thai. 2003; 86:708-14.Search in Google Scholar

14. Gokcel A, Bagis T, Killicadag EB, Tarim E, Guvener N. Comparison of the criteria for gestational diabetes mellitus by NDDG and Carpenter and Coustan, and the outcomes of pregnancy. J Endocrinol Invest. 2002; 25:357-61.10.1007/BF0334401812030608Apri DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Ferrara A, Weiss NS, Hedderson MM, Quesenberry CP, Selby JV, Ergas IJ, et al. Pregnancy plasma glucose levels exceeding the American Diabetes Association thresholds, but below the National Diabetes Data Group thresholds for gestational diabetes mellitus, are related to the risk of neonatal macrosomia, hypoglycaemia, and hyperbilirubinaemia. Diabetologia. 2007; 50:298-306.10.1007/s00125-006-0517-817103140Search in Google Scholar

16. Boriboonhirunsarn D, Sunsaneevithayakul P. Abnormal results on a second testing and risk of gestational diabetes in women with normal baseline glucose levels. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008; 100:147-53.10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.08.01918005964Search in Google Scholar

17. Boriboonhirunsarn D, Talungjit P, Sunsaneevithayakul P, Sirisomboon R. Adverse pregnancy outcomes in gestational diabetes mellitus. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006; 89:S23-8. Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo