[1. Di Carlo A. Human and economic burden of stroke. Age Aging. 2009; 38:4-5.10.1093/ageing/afn282]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Musicco M, Emberti L, Nappi G, Italian Multicenter Study on Outcomes of Rehabilitation of Neurological Patients. Early and long-term outcome of rehabilitation in stroke patients: the role of patient characteristics, time of initiation and duration of interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84:551-8.10.1053/apmr.2003.50084]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Shah M. Rehabilitation of the older adult with stroke. Clin Geriatr Med. 2006; 22:469-89.10.1016/j.cger.2005.12.012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Aprile I, Di Stasio E, Romitelli F, Lancellotti S, Caliandro P, Tonali P, et al. Effects of rehabilitation on quality of life in patients with chronic stroke. Brain Inj. 2008; 22:451-6.10.1080/02699050802060639]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[5. Salter K, Jutai J, Hartley M, Foley N, Bhogal S, Bayona N, et al. Impact of early vs delayed admission to rehabilitation on functional outcomes in persons with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2006; 38:113-7.10.1080/16501970500314350]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Adams HP, Jr., del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke. 2007; 38:1655-711.10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.181486]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Lindsay MP, Gubitz G, Bayley M, Hill MD, Davies- Schinkel C, Singh S, et al. Canadian Stroke Strategy. Canadian Best Practice Recommendations for Stroke Care. Update 2010. [cited 2012 October 13]; Available from: http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/2010BPR_ENG.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Cifu DX, Stewart DG. Factors affecting functional outcome after stroke: a critical review of rehabilitation interventions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80 (5 Suppl 1):S35-9.10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90101-6]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke. 1997; 28: 1550-6.10.1161/01.STR.28.8.1550]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Ploypetch T, Dajpratham P. Change in quality of life of disabled patients after intensive inpatient rehabilitation at Siriraj Hospital. J Med Assoc Thai. 2011; 94:1245-51.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Horn SD, DeJong G, Smout RJ, Gassaway J, James R, Conroy B. Stroke rehabilitation patients, practice, and outcomes: is earlier and more aggressive therapy better? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86 (12 Suppl 2): S101-14.10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.01616373145]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Spilker B, editor. Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconoics in Clinical Trials. New York: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Hackett ML, Duncan JR, Anderson CS, Broad JB, Bonita R. Health-related quality of life among longterm survivors of stroke: results form the Auckland Stroke Study, 1991-1992. Stroke. 2000; 31:440-7.10.1161/01.STR.31.2.44010657420]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Sturm JW, Donnan GA, Dewey HM, Macdonell RA, Gilligan AK, Thrift A. Determinants of handicap after stroke: the North East Melbourne Stroke Incidence Study (NEMESIS). Stroke. 2004; 35:715-20.10.1161/01.STR.0000117573.19022.66]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Hopman WM, J V. Quality of life during and after inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2003; 34:801-5.10.1161/01.STR.0000057978.15397.6F]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[16. Mackenzie AE, AM C. Predictors of quality of life following stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2002; 24:259-65.10.1080/09638380110081805]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Mahatnirundkul S, Tantipiwattanasakul W, Poompaisalchai W, Wongsuwan K, R P. Comparison of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF (26 items). J Mental Health Thai. 1998; 5:4-15.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. WHOQOL-BREF Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic version of the assessment. [cited 2014 February 17]; Available from: www.who.int/mental_health/media/en/76.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Wade DT, Collins C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of physical disability? International Disability Study. 1988; 10:64-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Paolucci S, Antonucci G, Grasso MG, Morelli D, Troisi E, Coiro P, et al. Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81:695-700.10.1016/S0003-9993(00)90095-9]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[21. Brunnstrom S. Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia: based on sequential recovery stages. Phys Ther. 1966; 46:357-75.10.1093/ptj/46.4.3575907254]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Nilchaikovit T, Lortrakul M, U P. Development of Thai version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in cancer patients. J Psychiatr Assoc Thai. 1996; 41: 18-30.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Sivenius J, Pyorala K, Heinonen OP, Salonen JT, Riekkinen P. The significance of intensity of rehabilitation of stroke-a controlled trial. Stroke. 1985; 16:928-31.10.1161/01.STR.16.6.9283911506]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[24. Wood-Dauphinee S, Shapiro S, Bass E, Fletcher C, Georges P, Hensby V, et al. A randomized trial of team care following stroke. Stroke. 1984; 15:864-72.10.1161/01.STR.15.5.864]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[25. Indredavik B, Bakke F, Slordahl SA, Rokseth R, Haheim LL. Stroke unit treatment improves long-term quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 1998; 29:895-9.10.1161/01.STR.29.5.8959596231]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[26. Maulden SA, Gassaway J, Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G. Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005; 86 (Suppl 2): S34-S40.10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.11916373138]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Carod-Artal FJ, Egido J. Quality of life after stroke: the importance of a good recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2009; 27:204-14.10.1159/00020046119342853]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[28. Studenski S, Duncan PW, Perera S, Reker D, Lai SM, Richards L. Daily functioning and quality of life in a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic exercise for subacute stroke survivors. Stroke. 2005; 36:1764-70.10.1161/01.STR.0000174192.87887.7016040590]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[29. Ancheta J, Husband M, Law D, Reding M. Initial functional independence measure score and interval post stroke help assess outcome, length of hospitalization, and quality of care. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000; 14:127-34. 10.1177/15459683000140020515470823]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Kauhanen M-L. Quality of life after stroke: clinical, functional, psychosocial and cognitive correlates [Dissertation]. 1999 [cited 2014 February 17]; Available from: http://www.herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514254279/isbn9514254279.pdf. ]Search in Google Scholar