[1. Sripa B, Pairojkul C. Cholangiocarcinoma: lessons from Thailand. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008; 24: 349-56.10.1097/MOG.0b013e3282fbf9b3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[2. Vauthey JN, Blumgart LH. Recent advances in the management of cholangiocarcinomas. Semin Liver Dis. 1994; 14:109-14.10.1055/s-2007-1007302]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[3. Crane CH, Macdonald KO, Vauthey JN, Yehuda P, Brown T, Curley S, et al. Limitations of conventional doses of chemoradiation for unresectable biliary cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002; 53:969-74.10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02845-6]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Peerawong T, Khorprasert C, Suriyapee S, Sanghangthum T, Israngkul Na Ayuthaya I, Shotelersuk K. Dosimetry of conformal dynamic arc radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy in unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Asian Biomed. 2010; 4;131-9.10.2478/abm-2010-0015]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Verbakel WF, Cuijpers JP, Hoffmans D, Bieker M, Slotman BJ, Senan S. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc therapy vs. conventional IMRT in head-and-neck cancer: a comparative planning and dosimetric study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 74:252-9.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.12.03319362244]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Popescu CC, Olivotto IA, Beckham WA, Ansbacher W, Zavgorodni S, Shaffer R, et al. Volumetric modulated arc therapy improves dosimetry and reduces treatment time compared to conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for locoregional radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer and internal mammary nodes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76:287-95.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.05.03819775832]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[7. Shaffer R, Morris WJ, Moiseenko V, Welsh M, Crumley C, Nakano S, et al. Volumetric modulated Arc therapy and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy for simultaneous maximal intraprostatic boost: a planning comparison study. Clin Oncol. 2009; 21:401-7.10.1016/j.clon.2009.01.01419268554]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Cheng SH, Huang AT. Liver and hepatobiliary tract. In: Halperin EC, Perez CA, Brady LW, editors. Perez and Brady’s principles and practice of radiation oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. p. 1349-65.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Pan CC, Kavanagh BD, Dawson LA, Li XA, Das SK, Miften M, et al. Radiation-associated liver injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76:S94-100.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.092438803320171524]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Dawson LA, Kavanagh BD, Paulino AC, Das SK, Miften M, Li XA, et al. Radiation-associated kidney injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76:S108-15.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.02.08920171504]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[11. Kirkpatrick JP, van der Kogel AJ, Schultheiss TE. Radiation dose-volume effects in the spinal cord. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76:S42-9.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.09520171517]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[12. Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, Eisbruch A, Jackson A, Marks LB, et al. Quantitative analyses of normal tissue effects in the clinic (QUANTEC): an introduction to the scientific issues. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010; 76:S3-9.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.09.040343196420171515]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. Feuvret L, Noel G, Mazeron JJ, Bey P. Conformity index: a review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 64: 333-42.10.1016/j.ijrobp.2005.09.02816414369]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar