[
Beck, C., Walsh, M., Mechanic, M., Figueredo, A. J., & Chen, M. K. (2011). Intimate partner abuse in divorce mediation: Outcomes from a long‐term multi‐cultural study. Report prepared for U.S. Department of Justice. (Award Number. 2007-WG-BX-0028). https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/236868.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Clarke, G. & Davies, I. (1991). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Argument for and against use of the mediation process particularly in family and neighbourhood disputes. Queensland University of Technology Law Journal, 6(81), 81–96. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/QUTLawJl/1991/6.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cooper, D., & Field, R. (2008). The Family Dispute Resolution of Parenting Matters in Australia: An Analysis of the Notion of an 'Independent’ Practitioner. Queensland Unversity of Technology Law and Justice Journal, 8(1), 159–174. http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/QUTLawJJl/2008/8.html
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Douglas, K. (2012). The Teaching of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Selected Australian Law School: Towards Second Generation Practice and Pedagogy. Thesis‐RMIT Universoty, 1–349. https://researchbank.rmit.edu.au/eserv/rmit:160218/Douglas.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Edwards, L., Baron, S., & Ferrick, G. (2008). A comment on William J. Howe and Hugh McIssaac's article “finding the balance” published in the January 2008 issue of family court review. Family Court Review, 46 (4), 586–591
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferrick, G., Baron, S., & Edwards, L. (2008). Surreply. Family Court Review, 46 (4), 595–597.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Field, R., & Crowe, J. (2007). The Construction of Rationality in Australian Family Dispute Resolution: A Feminist Analysis. The Australian Feminist Law Journal, 27, 98–122
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gewurz, I. (2001). (Re)Designing mediation to address the nuances of power imbalance. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 19, 135–136
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hedeen, T., Raines, S., & Barton, A. (2010). Foundation of mediation training: A literature review of adult education and training design. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 28, 157–182
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kaspiew, R. et al. (2009). Evaluation of the 2006 Family Law reforms. Australian Institute of Family Studies, 105–108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kelly, J. B. (1996). A Decade of Divorce Mediation Research. Family and Conciliation Courts Review. 34(3), 373. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1996.tb00427.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lahey, K. (2010). Women, substantive equality, and fiscal policy: Gender‐based analysis of taxes, benefits, and budgets Canadian Journal of Women and the Law, 22, 27–28
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larsen, D. (2018). Working with Cognitive Errors Caused by Heightened Emotions in Employment Mediations. 1–18
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lietuvos Respublikos civilinių ginčų taikinamojo tarpininkavimo įstatymo Nr. X-1702 pakeitimo įstatymas (2017). https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/95539982609f11e7a53b83ca0142260e
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lundberg, D., & Moloney, L. (2010). Being in the room: Family Dispute Resolution practitioners’ experience of high conflict family dispute resolution. Journal of Family Studies, 16(3), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.5172/jfs.16.3.209
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore, K. J. (2014). The reflective observer model. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 31, 403–419
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Molė, S., Sondaitė, J. (2019). Teismo mediatorių požiūris į teisminės mediacijos praktiką = Attitudes of court mediators toward judicial mediation practice // Socialinis darbas. Vilnius : Mykolo Romerio universitetas. ISSN 1648-4789. eISSN 2029-2775, Vol. 17, No. 2, 191–208. DOI: 10.13165/SD-19-17-2-05
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pearson, J. (1994). Family Mediation. In S. Keilitz (Ed.), National Symposium on Court-Connected Dispute Resolution Research: A Report on Current Research Findings – Implications for Courts and Future Research Needs (Report No. R-152). State Justice Institute
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raines, S. (2018). Becoming the change we wish to see: The unexpected benefits of conflict resolution work. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 35, 319–327
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Raines, S., Pokhrel, S. K., & Poitras, J. (2013). Mediation as a profession: Challenges that professional mediators face. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 31 (1), 79–97
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Regher, C. (1994). The use of empowerment in child custody mediation: A feminist critique. Mediation Quarterly, 11, 361–364
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Relationships Australia, Inc. (2017). Family dispute resolution process. Retrieved February 20, 2021 from https://www.relationships.org.au/what-we-do/services/family-disputeresolution/family-dispute-resolution-process
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rhoades, H. (2010). Mandatory mediation of family dispute: Reflections from Australia. Journal of Social Welfare & Family Law, 32, (2), 183–194
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roulston, K. (2014). Asking Questions and Individual Interviews. Reflective Interviewing: A Guide to Theory and Practice, 9–32. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446288009.n2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Semple, N. (2012). Mandatory family mediation and the settlement mission: A feminist critique. CJWL/RFD, 24, 207–239
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shaffer, M. (1988). Divorce mediation: A feminist perspective. University of Toronto Faculty of Law Review, 46, 162–181. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/utflr46&i=168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zarankin, A., Wall Jr, J. A., & Zarankin, T. G. (2014). Mediators' Cognitive Role Schema. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 7(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12030
]Search in Google Scholar
