[Atkinson, A.C., Donev, A.N. and Tobias, R.D. (2007). Optimum Experimental Designs, with SAS, Oxford University Press, Oxford.]Search in Google Scholar
[Beddiaf, S., Autrique, L., Perez, L. and Jolly, J.-C. (2016). Heating source localization in a reduced time, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science26(3): 623–640, DOI: 10.1515/amcs-2016-0043.10.1515/amcs-2016-0043]Search in Google Scholar
[Bernstein, D.S. (2005). Matrix Mathematics. Theory, Facts, and Formulas with Application to Linear Systems Theory, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertsekas, D.P. (1999). Nonlinear Programming, 2nd Edn, Optimization and Computation Series, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertsekas, D.P. (2015). Convex Optimization Algorithms, Athena Scientific, Belmont, MA.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bertsekas, D. and Yu, H. (2011). A unifying polyhedral approximation framework for convex optimization, SIAM Journal on Optimization21(1): 333–360.10.1137/090772204]Search in Google Scholar
[Böhning, D. (1986). A vertex-exchange-method in D-optimal design theory, Metrika33(12): 337–347.10.1007/BF01894766]Search in Google Scholar
[Botkin, N.D. and Stoer, J. (2005). Minimization of convex functions on the convex hull of a point set, Mathematical Methods of Operations Research62(2): 167–18.10.1007/s00186-005-0018-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Boyd, S. and Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex Optimization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511804441]Search in Google Scholar
[Burclová, K. and Pázman, A. (2016). Optimal design of experiments via linear programming, Statistical Papers57(4): 893–910.10.1007/s00362-016-0782-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Chepuri, S.P. and Leus, G. (2015). Sparsity-promoting sensor selection for non-linear measurement models, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing63(3): 684–698.10.1109/TSP.2014.2379662]Search in Google Scholar
[Coll, C. and Sánchez, E. (2019). Parameter identification and estimation for stage-structured population models, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science29(2): 327–336, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2019-0024.10.2478/amcs-2019-0024]Search in Google Scholar
[Cook, D. and Fedorov, V. (1995). Constrained optimization of experimental design, Statistics26: 129–178.10.1080/02331889508802474]Search in Google Scholar
[Djelassi, H., Glass, M. and Mitsos, A. (2019). Discretization-based algorithms for generalized semi-infinite and bilevel programs with coupling equality constraints, Journal of Global Optimization75(2): 341–392.10.1007/s10898-019-00764-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Duarte, B.P.M., Granjo, J.F.O. and Wong, W.K. (2020). Optimal exact designs of experiments via mixed integer nonlinear programming, Statistics and Computing30(1): 93–112.10.1007/s11222-019-09867-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Duarte, B.P.M. and Wong, W.K. (2014). A semi-infinite programming based algorithm for finding minimax optimal designs for nonlinear models, Statistics and Computing24(6): 1063–1080.10.1007/s11222-013-9420-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Esteban-Bravo, M., Leszkiewicz, A. and Vidal-Sanz, J.M. (2017). Exact optimal experimental designs with constraints, Statistics and Computing27(3): 845–863.10.1007/s11222-016-9658-x]Search in Google Scholar
[Fedorov, V.V. (1989). Optimal design with bounded density: Optimization algorithms of the exchange type, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference22: 1–13.10.1016/0378-3758(89)90060-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Fedorov, V.V. and Leonov, S.L. (2014). Optimal Design for Nonlinear Response Models, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.10.1201/b15054]Search in Google Scholar
[Harman, R. (2004). Minimal efficiency of designs under the class of orthogonally invariant information criteria, Metrika60(2): 137–153.10.1007/s001840300301]Search in Google Scholar
[Harman, R. and Benková, E. (2017). Barycentric algorithm for computing d-optimal size- and cost-constrained designs of experiments, Metrika80(2): 201–225.10.1007/s00184-016-0599-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Harman, R., Filová, L. and Richtárik, P. (2020). A randomized exchange algorithm for computing optimal approximate designs of experiments, Journal of the American Statistical Association115(529): 348–361.10.1080/01621459.2018.1546588]Search in Google Scholar
[Harman, R. and Pronzato, L. (2007). Improvements on removing nonoptimal support points in d-optimum design algorithms, Statistics & Probability Letters77(1): 90–94.10.1016/j.spl.2006.05.014]Search in Google Scholar
[Harville, D.A. (1997). Matrix Algebra From a Statistician’s Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.10.1007/b98818]Search in Google Scholar
[Herzog, R., Riedel, I. and Uciński, D. (2018). Optimal sensor placement for joint parameter and state estimation problems in large-scale dynamical systems with applications to thermo-mechanics, Optimization and Engineering19(3): 591–627.10.1007/s11081-018-9391-8]Search in Google Scholar
[Hettich, R. and Kortanek, K.O. (1993). Semi-infinite programming: Theory, methods and applications, SIAM Review35(3): 380–429.10.1137/1035089]Search in Google Scholar
[Jacobson, M.Z. (1999). Fundamentals of Atmospheric Modeling, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Joshi, S. and Boyd, S. (2009). Sensor selection via convex optimization, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing57(2): 451–462.10.1109/TSP.2008.2007095]Search in Google Scholar
[Katoh, N. (2001). Combinatorial optimization algorithms in resource allocation problems, in C.A. Floudas and P.M. Pardalos (Eds), Encyclopedia of Optimization, Vol. 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 259–264.10.1007/0-306-48332-7_56]Search in Google Scholar
[Khapalov, A.Y. (2010). Source localization and sensor placement in environmental monitoring, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science20(3): 445–458, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-010-0033-3.10.2478/v10006-010-0033-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Langtangen, H.P. and Logg, A. (2016). Solving PDEs in Python. The FEniCS Tutorial I, Springer-Verlag, Cham.10.1007/978-3-319-52462-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsson, T., Migdalas, A. and Patriksson, M. (2015). A generic column generation principle: Derivation and convergence analysis, Operational Research15(2): 163–198.10.1007/s12351-015-0171-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Larsson, T., Patriksson, M. and Strömberg, A. (1998). Ergodic convergence in subgradient optimization, Optimization Methods and Software9(1–3): 93–120.10.1080/10556789808805688]Search in Google Scholar
[Lu, Z. and Pong, T.K. (2013). Computing optimal experimental designs via interior point method, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications34(4): 1556–1580.10.1137/120895093]Search in Google Scholar
[Maculan, N., Santiago, C.P., Macambira, E.M. and Jardim, M.H.C. (2003). An O(n) algorithm for projecting a vector on the intersection of a hyperplane and a box in ℝn, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications117(3): 553–574.10.1023/A:1023997605430]Search in Google Scholar
[Marshall, A.W., Olkin, I. and Arnold, B.C. (2011). Inequalities: Theory of Majorization and Its Applications, 2nd Edn, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.10.1007/978-0-387-68276-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Melas, V. (2006). Functional Approach to Optimal Experimental Design, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patan, M. and Kowalów, D. (2018). Distributed scheduling of measurements in a sensor network for parameter estimation of spatio-temporal systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science28(1): 39–54, DOI: 10.2478/amcs-2018-0003.10.2478/amcs-2018-0003]Search in Google Scholar
[Patan, M. and Uciński, D. (2008). Configuring a sensor network for fault detection in distributed parameter systems, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science18(4): 513–524, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-008-0045-4.10.2478/v10006-008-0045-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Patan, M. and Uciński, D. (2019). Generalized simplicial decomposition for optimal sensor selection in parameter estimation of spatiotemporal processes, 2019 American Control Conference (ACC), Philadelphia, PA, USA, pp. 2546–2551.]Search in Google Scholar
[Patriksson, M. (2001). Simplicial decomposition algorithms, in C.A. Floudas and P.M. Pardalos (Eds), Encyclopedia of Optimization, Vol. 5, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 205–212.10.1007/0-306-48332-7_468]Search in Google Scholar
[Pázman, A. (1986). Foundations of Optimum Experimental Design, Mathematics and Its Applications, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polak, E. (1987). On the mathematical foundations of nondifferentiable optimization in engineering design, SIAM Review29(1): 21–89.10.1137/1029002]Search in Google Scholar
[Polak, E. (1997). Optimization. Algorithms and Consistent Approximations, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.10.1007/978-1-4612-0663-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Pronzato, L. (2003). Removing non-optimal support points in D-optimum design algorithms, Statistics & Probability Letters63: 223–228.10.1016/S0167-7152(03)00081-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Pronzato, L. and Pàzman, A. (2013). Design of Experiments in Nonlinear Models. Asymptotic Normality, Optimality Criteria and Small-Sample Properties, Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.10.1007/978-1-4614-6363-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Pronzato, L. and Zhigljavsky, A.A. (2014). Algorithmic construction of optimal designs on compact sets for concave and differentiable criteria, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference154: 141–155.10.1016/j.jspi.2014.04.005]Search in Google Scholar
[Pukelsheim, F. (1993). Optimal Design of Experiments, Probability and Mathematical Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reemtsen, R. and Görner, S. (1998). Numerical methods for semi-infinite programming: A survey, in R. Reemtsen and J.-J. Rückmann (Eds), Semi-Infinite Programming,Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, MA, pp. 195–275.10.1007/978-1-4757-2868-2_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Sagnol, G. (2011). Computing optimal designs of multiresponse experiments reduces to second-order cone programming, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference141(5): 1684–1708.10.1016/j.jspi.2010.11.031]Search in Google Scholar
[Sagnol, G. and Harman, R. (2015). Computing exact D-optimal designs by mixed integer second-order cone programming, The Annals of Statistics43(5): 2198–2224.10.1214/15-AOS1339]Search in Google Scholar
[Sahm, M. and Schwabe, R. (2001). A note on optimal bounded designs, in A. Atkinson et al. (Eds), Optimum Design 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Chapter 13, pp. 131–140.10.1007/978-1-4757-3419-5_13]Search in Google Scholar
[Seber, G.A.F. and Wild, C.J. (1989). Nonlinear Regression, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.10.1002/0471725315]Search in Google Scholar
[Shimizu, K. and Aiyoshi, E. (1980). Necessary conditions for min-max problems and algorithms by a relaxation procedure, IEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlAC-25(1): 62–66.10.1109/TAC.1980.1102226]Search in Google Scholar
[Silvey, S.D., Titterington, D.M. and Torsney, B. (1978). An algorithm for optimal designs on a finite design space, Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods14: 1379–1389.10.1080/03610927808827719]Search in Google Scholar
[Torsney, B. and Mandal, S. (2001). Construction of constrained optimal designs, in A. Atkinson et al. (Eds), Optimum Design 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Chapter 14, pp. 141–152.10.1007/978-1-4757-3419-5_14]Search in Google Scholar
[Uciński, D. (2005). Optimal Measurement Methods for Distributed-Parameter System Identification, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.10.1201/9780203026786]Search in Google Scholar
[Uciński, D. (2012). Sensor network scheduling for identification of spatially distributed processes, International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science22(1): 25–40, DOI: 10.2478/v10006-012-0002-0.10.2478/v10006-012-0002-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Uciński, D. (2015). An algorithm for construction of constrained D-optimum designs, in A. Steland et al. (Eds), Stochastic Models, Statistics and Their Applications, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, Springer-Verlag, Cham, pp. 461–468.10.1007/978-3-319-13881-7_51]Search in Google Scholar
[Uciński, D. (2020). D-optimal sensor selection in the presence of correlated measurement noise, Measurement164: 107873.10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107873]Search in Google Scholar
[Uciński, D. and Patan, M. (2007). D-optimal design of a monitoring network for parameter estimation of distributed systems, Journal of Global Optimization39(2): 291–322.10.1007/s10898-007-9139-z]Search in Google Scholar
[Wu, C.-F. (1978). Some algorithmic aspects of the theory of optimal designs, The Annals of Statistics6(6): 1286–1301.10.1214/aos/1176344374]Search in Google Scholar
[Yu, Y. (2010). Monotonic convergence of a general algorithm for computing optimal designs, The Annals of Statistics38(3): 1593–1606.10.1214/09-AOS761]Search in Google Scholar
[Yu, Y. (2011). D-optimal designs via a cocktail algorithm, Statistics and Computing21(3): 475–481.10.1007/s11222-010-9183-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Zarrop, M.B. and Goodwin, G.C. (1975). Comments on “Optimal inputs for system identification”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic ControlAC-20(2): 299–300.10.1109/TAC.1975.1100891]Search in Google Scholar
[Zhang, L., Wu, S.-Y. and López, M.A. (2010). A new exchange method for convex semi-infinite programming, SIAM Journal on Optimization20(6): 2959–2977.10.1137/090767133]Search in Google Scholar