Harnessing Monoterpenes and Monoterpenoids as Weapons against Antimicrobial Resistance
Categoria dell'articolo: MINIREVIEW
Pubblicato online: 07 mar 2025
Pagine: 1 - 18
Ricevuto: 12 lug 2024
Accettato: 16 set 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2025-010
Parole chiave
© 2024 Amanda Shen-Yee Kong et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a critical challenge in global healthcare, with over two million cases and 23,000 deaths annually in the United States due to antibiotic-resistant infections (Prestinaci et al. 2015). Similarly, Europe reports around 400,000 infections and 25,000 deaths from multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria annually. The World Health Organization notes a concerning stagnation in developing new antimicrobials, with only 12 antibiotics approved since 2017, most of which are from existing classes with known resistance mechanisms. This has fueled the search for alternative therapies with broader-spectrum activity (Corona-Gómez et al. 2022).
Natural products offer a promising avenue for the discovery of novel antimicrobials, with plants providing a rich source of structurally diverse bioactive compounds. Essential oils (EOs) from medicinal plants are a promising source of novel antimicrobials (Khan et al. 2020). These oils have demonstrated effectiveness against a wide range of pathogens, including
Monoterpenes and monoterpenoids, significant components of EOs, exhibit antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer properties (ZielińskaBłajet and Feder-Kubis 2020). Many studies have highlighted their potential in antimicrobial drug development, with results delving into the composition and effectiveness of EOs, revealing their potency against a spectrum of pathogens (Mahizan et al. 2019; Moo et al. 2020; 2021; Yang et al. 2021a; 2021b). For instance, the EO from
Considering these significant findings, this review aims to synthesize recent literature on the effectiveness of monoterpenes in combating AMR and to explore their broad-spectrum activity and potential as alternative therapeutic agents against MDR pathogens.
Exploring the antimicrobial potential of monoterpenes presents a promising avenue in combating microbial infections amidst the escalating threat of AMR. Fig. 1 illustrates the chemical structures of the monoterpenes discussed throughout this review. These structures were sourced from the PubChem database (

Chemical structures of monoterpenes discussed in this review, sourced from the PubChem database.

A schematic representation of mechanisms of action of monoterpenes targeting MDR bacteria.
The diagram was created using Inkscape 1.3.2.
Mechanism of action of monoterpenes against tested pathogens.
Chemical compounds | Tested pathogen | Mechanisms of action | References |
---|---|---|---|
Eugenol | Inhibition of efflux pump |
Macêdo et al. 2022 | |
Eugenol | Inhibition of |
Muniz et al. 2021 | |
Eugenol α-Bromo- |
Gene expression reduction linked to intracellular adhesion |
Mastoor et al. 2022 | |
Eugenol | Methicillin-resistant |
Downregulation of Inhibition of biofilm production Enhancement of secondary metabolites Upregulation of |
Buru et al. 2022 |
Eugenol | Methicillin-resistant |
Downregulation of biofilm-related genes ( Reduction of polysaccharide accumulation and cell adhesion |
El-Far et al. 2021 |
Carvacrol | Targeted extracellular polymeric substances Disruption of biofilm structures |
Wang et al. 2020b. | |
Eugenol Geraniol | Reduction in exopolysaccharide production Disruption and inhibition of biofilm Downregulation of |
Choudhary et al. 2022 | |
Inhibition of efflux pump |
Šimunović et al. 2020 | ||
Carvacrol | Cell membrane destruction Leakage of the intercellular pool Anti-biofilm properties Increased extracellular K+ ions concentrations |
Mechmechani et al. 2022 | |
Carvacrol Thymol | Anti-inflammatory effects Anti-oxidant properties Enhanced epithelial barrier integrity Reduction of bacterial translocation Improved transepithelial electrical resistance Inhibited bacterial growth |
Giovagnoni et al. 2020 | |
Eugenol | Extended-spectrum β-lactamases-quinoloneresistant strains of |
Induced shrinkage of cell surfaces Diminished cytoplasm Triggered cellular stress and autolysis |
Dhara and Tripathi 2020 |
Eugenol | Carbapenem-resistant |
Disruption of cell membrane Reduction in intracellular pH and ATP levels Cell membrane hyperpolarization Downregulation of biofilm-related genes ( Upregulation of |
Qian et al. 2020 |
Carvacrol | Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases |
Disintegration of bacterial cell membranes Elevation of reactive oxygen species levels Protected macrophage cells from bacterial invasion Increased the release of K+ ions, ATP, and cellular DNA Anti-biofilm properties |
Khan et al. 2020 |
Carvacrol Thymol Eugenol Methyl eugenol | Reduced proteinase production |
Shaban et al. 2020 | |
Carvacrol Thymol Eugenol Methyl eugenol | Reduced proteinase production and host cell adherence |
Shaban et al. 2020 | |
Carvacrol | Induced oxidative stress Increased CAT, SOD and GPx enzyme activity Decreased GR and GST enzyme activity Caused membrane disintegration |
Ismail et al. 2022 |
Sim et al. (2019) reported the antimicrobial efficacy of oregano oil, carvacrol, thyme oil, and thymol against bacterial isolates from dogs with otitis externa, showing MIC90 values ranging from 200 to 2,292 μg/ml for various MDR strains, including methicillin-resistant
Muniz et al. (2021) highlighted the potential of synthetic and natural eugenol derivatives to inhibit the NorA efflux pump in
Kwiatkowski et al. (2020) evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of 1,8-cineole and linalyl acetate against
Owen et al. (2019) highlighted carvacrol’s potent antimicrobial properties, exhibiting the lowest MICs (0.99–15.81 mM) across various microorganisms and bactericidal effects. Although ineffective against carbapenem-resistant
Šimunović et al. (2020) further demonstrated that monoterpenes such as carvacrol, thymol, and thymoquinone possess significant antimicrobial activity, each with MICs of 31.25 μg/ml, while
Giovagnoni et al. (2020) investigated thymol and carvacrol’s protective effects against
Stringaro et al. (2022) explored the antimicrobial effects of
Sousa Silveira et al. (2020) demonstrated the antibacterial efficacy of thymol and carvacrol against
Touil et al. (2020) explored carvacrol and cuminaldehyde against amphotericin B-resistant
In assays against
Comprehensive summary of MIC values of monoterpenes against AMR pathogens, grouped as Gram-positive, Gram-negative, and fungal pathogens.
Tested pathogens | Chemical compounds | MIC/Sensitivity | References |
---|---|---|---|
Gram-positive bacteria | |||
Limonene | 0.048 μg/ml | Noumi et al. 2023 | |
Limonene | 0.048 μg/ml | Noumi et al. 2023 | |
Thymol |
200–450 μg/ml |
Caballero Gómez et al. 2022 | |
Vancomycin-sensitive |
Carvacrol |
593.37 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019 |
Vancomycin-resistant |
Carvacrol |
593369 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019 |
Thymol |
200–400 μg/ml |
Caballero Gómez et al. 2022 | |
Thymol |
72–800 μg/ml |
Kwiatkowski et al. 2020; |
|
Methicillin-susceptible |
Carvacrol |
297435.6 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019 |
Methicillin-resistant |
Carvacrol |
148717.8 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019 |
Mupirocin-susceptible |
1,8-cineole |
307000 μg/ml |
Kwiatkowski et al. 2019 |
Mupirocin-resistant |
1,8-cineole |
57560 μg/ml |
Kwiatkowski et al. 2019 |
Thymol |
100–200 μg/ml |
Sim et al. 2019 | |
β-haemolytic |
Thymol |
200–400 μg/ml |
Sim et al. 2019 |
Cinnamaldehyde |
156.25–312.5 μg/ml |
de Aguiar et al. 2019 | |
Gram-negative bacteria | |||
α-Pinene |
11.88 μg/ml |
Sayout et al. 2020 | |
Thymol |
31.25 μg/ml |
Šimunović et al. 2020 | |
β-Pinene |
20.25 μg/ml |
Sayout et al. 2020 | |
α-Pinene |
11.88 μg/ml |
Sayout et al. 2020 | |
Ciprofloxacin-resistant |
Carvacrol |
297435.6 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019 |
Carvacrol |
297435.6 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019; Sayout et al. 2020; Noumi et al. 2023 | |
β-Pinene |
13.50 μg/ml |
Sayout et al. 2020 | |
Thymol |
780 μg/ml |
Sayout et al. 2020; |
|
Thymol |
10–800 μg/ml |
Schlemmer et al. 2019; |
|
Limonene | 0.048 μg/ml | Noumi et al. 2023 | |
β-Pinene |
8.10 μg/ml |
Sayout et al. 2020 | |
Limonene | 0.048 μg/ml | Noumi et al. 2023 | |
Thymol |
200 μg/ml |
Sim et al. 2019 | |
Thymol |
100–300 μg/ml |
Caballero Gómez et al. 2022 | |
Ciprofloxacin-resistant |
Carvacrol |
4749956.4 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019 |
Thymol |
400–800 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019; |
|
Limonene |
2.63 μg/ml |
Owen et al. 2019; |
|
Limonene | 0.048 μg/ml | Noumi et al. 2023 | |
Thymol |
282413.6 μg/ml |
Rossi et al. 2021 | |
Thymol |
141206.8 μg/ml |
Rossi et al. 2021 | |
Fungal pathogens | |||
Thymol |
195–625 μg/ml |
Sharifzadeh et al. 2019; |
|
Carvacrol |
125 μg/ml |
Shaban et al. 2020 | |
(+)-α-Pinene |
103534.8–1716498 μg/ml |
Iraji et al. 2020 | |
Fungal pathogens | |||
Thymol |
390 μg/ml |
Sharifzadeh et al. 2019; |
|
Thymol |
390 μg/ml |
Sharifzadeh et al. 2019; |
|
Eugenol |
500–100 μg/ml |
Iraji et al. 2020; |
|
Fungal pathogens | |||
Thymol |
390 μg/ml |
Iraji et al. 2020; |
Panagiotopoulos et al. (2021) found that
Recently, Wang et al. (2024) identified 100 μM eugenol as optimal concentration for inhibiting Singapore grouper iridovirus (SGIV) infection by reducing mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Eugenol’s mechanism involves inhibiting the MAPK signaling pathway, reducing inflammatory factor expression (IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α), and upregulating interferon-related genes while reducing oxidative stress by suppressing intracellular reactive oxygen species.
Wang et al. (2020a) demonstrated that HSV-2 infection reduced intracellular protein ubiquitination, a process reversed by carvacrol, suggesting its role in modulating the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Carvacrol inhibited HSV-2 replication, lowering virus titers, and reducing the virus release rate to 33.67% at 1 mmol/l. It downregulated the expression of key HSV-2 replication proteins (ICP4, ICP27, VP16, gB, UL30), and induced increase in TNF-α and reduced RIP3 and MLKL protein expressions via the RIP3-mediated necrosis pathway. These findings suggest that carvacrol exerts its antiviral activity by interfering with the replication process of HSV-2, making it a potential therapeutic agent against HSV-2 infections.
Similarly, Mediouni et al. (2020) found that carvacrol and thymol disrupted the cholesterol content of the viral envelope membrane, blocking HIV-1 entry into target cells without affecting other stages of the viral life cycle. Carvacrol exhibited significant antiviral potency with an IC50 of 16 μM, while thymol displayed a slightly higher IC50 of 25.2 μM. Pretreatment of HIV with carvacrol reduced viral infectivity by 60.6%, underscoring its effectiveness in altering viral particles. Testing against viruses using the CCR5 coreceptor further demonstrated that carvacrol and thymol inhibited HIV replication without affecting cell viability or receptor endocytosis.
Kumar et al. (2021) demonstrated that thymoquinone (TQ) inhibited Chikungunya virus (CHIKV) replication with an EC50 value of 4.478 μM. A plaque reduction assay revealed that TQ significantly reduced CHIKV titer in a dose-dependent manner, with over 90% reduction observed at 20 μM concentration. Additionally, immunofluorescence assays showed reduced expression of CHIKV glycoprotein in cells treated with 10 μM TQ, indicating lower viral load. Time-of-addition and time-of-elimination studies confirmed TQ’s inhibitory action in the late stages of the CHIKV life cycle (8–12 hours post-infection). These findings underscore TQ’s significant antiviral activity by disrupting CHIKV replication at both molecular and cellular levels.
The synergistic potential of antibacterial agents can enhance effectiveness when combined, addressing AMR challenges by overcoming single-drug therapy limitations. Combining agents with varied mechanisms can target a broader range of pathogens and minimize resistance. Research into synergistic antibiotic combinations offers hope for more effective treatments against AMR (Al-Marzooq et al. 2022; 2023; Daoud et al. 2023).
Šimunović et al. (2020) demonstrated promising synergistic effects in various monoterpenes such as carvacrol, thymol, and thymoquinone combinations. Combinations like carvacrol + thymoquinone (fractional inhibitory concentration indices (FICI) 0.5), carvacrol + thymol (FICI 0.2), and thymol + thymoquinone (FICI 0.3) showed robust synergistic activities. All other tested combinations exhibited additive effects without any antagonistic effects observed. Similarly, Touil et al. (2020) observed promising synergistic effects of carvacrol and cuminaldehyde against
Owen et al. (2020) investigated the synergy between vancomycin and monoterpenes, particularly carvacrol and cuminaldehyde, against VSE and VRE. Significant synergy was found in binary combinations of vancomycin with carvacrol or linalool against VSE, with a substantial four to eight-fold reduction in vancomycin’s MIC. The combination of carvacrol and cuminaldehyde with vancomycin showed bactericidal activity against VSE, resulting in a 5.87 log10 reduction, indicating strong synergy, while ternary combinations of two monoterpenes with vancomycin demonstrated significant reductions in MIC (1,024-fold) against VRE.
Kwiatkowski et al. (2019) identified carvacrol as highly potent against MRSA strains, with 1,8-cineole exhibiting synergy when combined with mupirocin against mupirocin-susceptible (FICI 0.44) and mupirocin low-level resistant strains (FICI 0.28), while (–)-menthone showing synergistic activity against mupirocin-susceptible MRSA strains (FICI 0.38). Additionally, Kwiatkowski et al. (2020) explored the synergistic potential of 1,8-cineole and linalyl acetate with conventional antibiotics against MRSA strains, revealing synergistic effects of 1,8-cineole with penicillin G (FICI 0.1) and additive activities of linalyl acetate in combination with methicillin and penicillin G at FICI 0.4 and FICI 0.6, respectively against all MRSA isolates, highlighting the versatility of these combinations.
AMR, especially carbapenem resistance in bacteria like
Dhara and Tripathi (2020) investigated the effects of eugenol on extended-spectrum-β-lactamase producing quinolone resistant (ESBL-QR) strains of
Aleksic Sabo et al. (2021) demonstrated the potent antimicrobial activity of carvacrol, thymol, and eugenol, against
The study by Shaban et al. (2020) underscores carvacrol’s potent antifungal properties with a median MIC of 125 μg/ml, revealing synergistic and additive effects when combined with established antifungal agents like fluconazole, amphotericin B, nystatin, and caspofungin. Notably, carvacrol not only reduced the MIC values of these drugs but also inhibited critical virulence factors of
Biernasiuk et al. (2022) revealed significant synergistic effects when cinnamaldehyde and eugenol were combined with cetylpyridinium chloride against
Recent studies revealed the potent efficacy of monoterpenes and monoterpenoids against biofilms, complex bacterial communities resistant to conventional antibiotics. El-Far et al. (2021) demonstrated that eugenol effectively eradicated established MRSA biofilms at MIC or 2 × MIC concentrations compared to controls. Post-treatment gene expression analysis showed significant downregulation of biofilm-related genes (
Mastoor et al. (2022) explored the molecular mechanisms of natural compounds like eugenol and α-bromo
Qian et al. (2020) investigated eugenol’s mechanism against CRKP biofilms, revealing potent antimicrobial activity with MIC values of 200 μg/ml. They found that eugenol damages the CRKP cell membrane, leading to biofilm cell death. Insights into its mechanism include a reduction in intracellular pH, ATP levels, and cell membrane hyperpolarization, indicating intracellular component leakage and the organelle dysfunction. Additionally, eugenol downregulated biofilm-related genes (
Choudhary et al. (2022) demonstrated eugenol and geraniol’s efficacy against
In a study by Jafri et al. (2019), eugenol showed notable activity against
Recent studies utilizing monoterpenes and monoterpenoids have shown promise across various sectors, including food preservation, wound healing, and medical devices. In the food industry, Abdelhamid and Yousef (2021) demonstrated that incorporating carvacrol and thymol into food-grade milk powder reduced desiccation resistance in
In nanotherapeutics, Oz et al. (2021) developed carvacrol-loaded nanoemulsions for combating bacterial biofilms, noted for their stability and selective biofilm eradication with minimal impact on mammalian cells. This platform could deliver multiple EOs, increasing antimicrobial efficacy. Li et al. (2021) and Mir et al. (2019) further advanced nanoemulsion and nanoparticle delivery systems. Li et al. (2021) reported broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity with gelatin, riboflavin, and carvacrol against biofilms, contributing to wound infection management and accelerated closure in a murine model. Mir et al. (2019) enhanced skin retention of carvacrol using poly(ε-caprolactone), targeting skin infections and showing potential against MRSA. These innovations indicate significant strides in applying monoterpenes and monoterpenoids for clinical and commercial uses.
Eugenol has demonstrated promise in food packaging through a novel multilayer structure with electrospun eugenol on a biopolymer base, offering significant antibacterial activity against
Additionally, eugenol-coated silicone segments have shown effectiveness in reducing biofilm-associated bacterial counts and preventing bacterial adhesion in catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), presenting a novel anti-virulence strategy for longterm protection against
Monoterpenes and monoterpenoids, known for their antimicrobial efficacy, are confronting emerging resistance mechanisms. Pesingi et al. (2019) highlighted the MexAB-OprM efflux pump’s role in carvacrol resistance in
Utilizing monoterpenes and monoterpenoids as antimicrobial agents presents challenges that require effective solutions. The challenges of resistance call for concerted effects to optimize the therapeutic potential of monoterpenes and monoterpenoids. Limited water solubility affects bioavailability, requiring formulation strategies or chemical modifications. Volatility and instability pose formulation and storage challenges, while potential toxicity demands careful consideration. Variability in antimicrobial activity and the risk of resistance highlights the need for mechanistic research. Interdisciplinary efforts in pharmacology, formulation science, and microbiology can lead to novel antimicrobial agents with improved efficacy, safety, and clinical utility, aiding in the fight against AMR.
In conclusion, this review highlights the substantial potential of monoterpenes and monoterpenoids as antimicrobial agents against MDR pathogens. They effectively combat biofilms, target virulence factors, and show synergy with conventional antibiotics. Challenges such as limited solubility, volatility, and toxicity need to be addressed through innovative formulations and interdisciplinary research. Despite these obstacles, these natural compounds offer promising avenues for developing effective treatments against AMR, emphasizing their importance in the fight against MDR bacterial infections.