Benefits of Soleris® over the Conventional Method for Enumeration of Microbial Load in Salacia Herbal Extract
, , , , , e
27 dic 2020
INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO
Categoria dell'articolo: original-paper
Pubblicato online: 27 dic 2020
Pagine: 453 - 462
Ricevuto: 18 lug 2020
Accettato: 08 ott 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.33073/pjm-2020-048
Parole chiave
© 2020 Sadanand Yewale et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1.

Fig. 2. a)

Fig. 2. b)

Fig. 2. c)

Fig. 2. d)

Fig. 2. e)

Fig. 2. f)

Fig. 2. g)

Fig. 3. a)

Fig. 3. b)

Soleris® results for the total yeast and mold counts_
S.N. | Sample ID | Dilutions inoculated | Growth/No growth | Detection time (h) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SR011903 | 101 | Growth | 34.4 |
102 | No Growth | – | ||
103 | No Growth | – | ||
2 | RDP/SR/070/SS01 (Steam sterilized SR011903) | 101 | No Growth | – |
102 | No Growth | – | ||
103 | No Growth | – | ||
3 | RDP/SR/070/ES02 (ETO treated SR011903) | 101 | No Growth | – |
102 | No Growth | – | ||
103 | No Growth | – | ||
4 | RDP/SR/070/GR03 (Gamma irradiated SR011903) | 101 | No Growth | – |
102 | No Growth | – | ||
103 | No Growth | – | ||
5 | RDP/SR/068 (anti-fungal agent treated SR011903) | 101 | No Growth | – |
102 | No Growth | – | ||
103 | No Growth | – | ||
6 | RDP/SR/134 (anti-bacterial agent treated SR011903) | 101 | No Growth | – |
102 | No Growth | – | ||
103 | No Growth | – | ||
7 | RDP/SR/136 (commercial | 101 | Growth | 26.2 |
102 | No growth | – | ||
103 | No growth | – |
Soleris® results for total aerobic microbial count_
S.N. | Sample ID | Dilutions inoculated | Growth/No growth | Detection time (h) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SR011903 | 103 | Growth | 2.7 |
2 | RDP/SR/070/SS01 | 102 | Growth | 11.4 |
3 | RDP/SR/070/ES02 | 102 | Growth | 12.2 |
4 | RDP/SR/070/GR03 | 102 | Growth | 15.1 |
5 | RDP/SR/068 | 102 | Growth | 10.6 |
6 | RDP/SR/134 | 103 | No growth | No detection |
7 | RDP/SR/136 | 102 | Growth | 13.1 |
Comparison of a total aerobic count between Soleris® (NF-TVC) and the conventional method (Salacinol content)_
S.N. | Sample ID | Total aerobic count by Soleris® (CFU/g) | Total aerobic count by plating in Soleris® medium (CFU/g) | Conventional plating method | RLOD | Salacinol content (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SR011903 (Control) | > 100,000 | 109,000 | > 105 | 1.09 | 0.52 |
2 | RDP/SR/070/SS01 (Steam sterilized SR011903) | < 1,000 | 490 | 350 | 1.40 | ND |
3 | RDP/SR/070/ES02 (ETO treated SR011903) | > 1,000 | 1,100 | 2,700 | 0.41 | ND |
4 | RDP/SR/070/GR03 (Gamma irradiated SR011903) | < 1,000 | 280 | 890 | 0.31 | ND |
5 | RDP/SR/068 (anti-fungal agent treated SR011903) | > 1,000 | 1,600 | 1,500 | 1.06 | 0.506 |
6 | RDP/SR/134 (anti-bacterial agent treated SR011903) | > 10 | 10 | 20 | 0.50 | 0.48 |
7 | RDP/SR/136 (commercial | > 1,000 | 1,500 | 2,300 | 0.65 | 0.059 |
Comparison between Soleris® (DYM-109) and the conventional method for the total yeasts and molds_
S.N. | Sample ID | Soleris® (CFU/g) | Conventional method (CFU/g) | Acceptable/Not acceptable |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | SR011903 | > 10 | 380 | Not acceptable |
2 | RDP/SR/070/SS01 | < 10 | < 10 | Acceptable |
3 | RDP/SR/070/ES02 | < 10 | < 10 | Acceptable |
4 | RDP/SR/070/GR03 | < 10 | < 10 | Acceptable |
5 | RDP/SR/068 | < 10 | < 10 | Acceptable |
6 | RDP/SR/134 | < 10 | < 10 | Acceptable |
7 | RDP/SR/136 | > 10 | 290 | Not acceptable |