Science Based Targets and the factors contributing to the sustainable development of an organisation from a Literature review to a conceptual model

1Abualfaraa, W., Salonitis, K., A-Ashaab, A., Ala’raj, M., 2020. Lean-Green Manufacturing Practices and Their Link with Sustainability: A Critical Review. Sustainability, 12(3), DOI: 10.3390/su12030981Search in Google Scholar

2Arici, H. E., Köseoglu, M. A., Sökmen, A., 2022. The intellectual structure of customer experience research in service scholarship: a bibliometric analysis. Service Industries Journal, 42(7–8), 514–550, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2022.2043286Search in Google Scholar

3Ayoub, A. N., Gaigneux, A., Le Brun, N., Acha, S., Shah, N., 2020. The development of a low-carbon roadmap investment strategy to reach Science Based Targets for commercial organisations with multisite properties. Building And Environment, 186, DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107311Search in Google Scholar

4Becchetti, L., Cordella, M., Morone, P., 2022. Measuring investments progress in ecological transition: The Green Investment Financial Tool (GIFT) approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 357, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131915Search in Google Scholar

5Bendig, D., Wagner, A., Lau, K., 2022. Does it pay to be science-based green? The impact of science-based emission-reduction targets on corporate financial performance. Journal of Industrial Ecology, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13341Search in Google Scholar

6Bhattacharya, A., Nand, A., Castka, P., 2019. Lean-green integration and its impact on sustainability performance: A critical review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 236, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117697Search in Google Scholar

7Bjorn, A., Bey, N., Georg, S., Ropke, I., Hauschild, M. Z., 2017. Is Earth recognized as a finite system in corporate responsibility reporting? Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 106–117, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.095Search in Google Scholar

8Bjorn, A., Lloyd, S., Matthews, D., 2021. From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting ‘science-based’ emission targets. Environmental Research Letters, 16(5), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/abe57bSearch in Google Scholar

9Bjorn, A., Lloyd, S., Matthews, D., 2022. Reply to Comment on ‘From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting “science-based’’ emission targets’. Environmental Research Letters, 17(3), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac548eSearch in Google Scholar

10Bjorn, A., Richardson, K., Hauschild, M. Z., 2019. A Framework for Development and Communication of Absolute Environmental Sustainability Assessment Methods. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 23(4), 838–854, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12820Search in Google Scholar

11Bjorn, A., Tilsted, J. P., Addas, A., Lloyd, S. M., 2022. Can Science-Based Targets Make the Private Sector Paris-Aligned? A Review of the Emerging Evidence. Current Climate Change Reports, 8(2), 53–69, DOI: 10.1007/s40641-022-00182-wSearch in Google Scholar

12Bringezu, S., 2019. Toward Science-Based and Knowledge-Based Targets for Global Sustainable Resource Use. Resources-Basel, 8(3), DOI: 10.3390/resources8030140Search in Google Scholar

13Caldera, H. T. S., Desha, C., Dawes, L., 2017. Exploring the role of lean thinking in sustainable business practice: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 1546–1565, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.126Search in Google Scholar

14Chang, A., Farsan, A., Carrillo Pineda, A., Cummis, C., Weber, C., 2022. Comment on ‘From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting “science-based’’ emission targets’ Comment. Environmental Research Letters, 17(3), DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ac548cSearch in Google Scholar

15Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Chiarini, A., Mokhlis, A., Benhida, K., 2016. The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a specific model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 828–846, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.101Search in Google Scholar

16Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Benhida, K., Mokhlis, A., 2017. Barriers in Green Lean implementation: a combined systematic literature review and interpretive structural modelling approach. Production Planning & Control, 28(10), 829–842, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2017. 1324184 Search in Google Scholar

17Cherrafi, A., Elfezazi, S., Govindan, K., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Benhida, K., Mokhlis, A., 2017. A framework for the integration of Green and Lean Six Sigma for superior sustainability performance. International Journal of Production Research, 55(15), 4481–4515, DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1266406Search in Google Scholar

18Chugani, N., Kumar, V., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Rocha-Lona, L., Upadhyay, A., 2017. Investigating the green impact of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(1, SI), 7–32, DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-11-2015-0043Search in Google Scholar

19Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., Purvis, L., 2018. Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 2336–2350, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.176Search in Google Scholar

20Cipolletta, M., D’Ambrosio, M., Moreno Valeria Casson and Cozzani, V., 2022. Enhancing the sustainability of biodiesel fuels by inherently safer production processes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 344, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131075Search in Google Scholar

21Contini, G., Peruzzini, M., 2022. Sustainability and Industry 4.0: Definition of a Set of Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturing Companies. Sustainability, 14(17), DOI: 10.3390/su141711004Search in Google Scholar

22Cooper, J., Lee, A., Jones, K., 2020. Sustainable built asset management performance indicators and attributes A UK social housing case study example. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 38(3), 508–522, DOI: 10.1108/IJBPA-08-2019-0069Search in Google Scholar

23de Bortoli, A., Feraille, A., Leurent, F., 2022. Towards Road Sustainability-Part II: Applied Holistic Assessment and Lessons Learned from French Highway Resurfacing Strategies. Sustainability, 14(12), DOI: 10.3390/su14127336Search in Google Scholar

24de Silva, G. C., Regan, E. C., Pollard, E. H. B., Addison, P. F. E., 2019. The evolution of corporate no net loss and net positive impact biodiversity commitments: Understanding appetite and addressing challenges. Business Strategy And The Environment, 28(7), 1481–1495, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2379Search in Google Scholar

25Dhingra, R., Kress, R., Upreti, G., 2014. Does lean mean green? Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 1–7, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.032Search in Google Scholar

26Dieste, M., Panizzolo, R., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Anosike, A., 2019. The relationship between lean and environmental performance: Practices and measures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 224, 120–131, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.243Search in Google Scholar

27Dües, C. M., Tan, K. H., Lim, M., 2013. Green as the new Lean: how to use Lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 93–100, DOI: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2011.12.023Search in Google Scholar

28Egas, D., Ponsa, S., Llenas, L., Colon, J., 2021. Towards energy-efficient small dairy production systems: An environmental and economic assessment. Sustainable Production And Consumption, 28, 39–51, DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.03.021Search in Google Scholar

29Ermgassen, S. O. S. E. Z., Howard, M., Bennun, L., Addison, P. F. E., Bull, J. W., Loveridge, R., Pollard, E., Starkey, M., 2022. Are corporate biodiversity commitments consistent with delivering ‘nature-positive’ outcomes? A review of ‘nature-positive’ definitions, company progress and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 379(2), DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134798Search in Google Scholar

30Faria, P. C. S., Labutong, N., 2020. A description of four science-based corporate GHG target-setting methods. Sustainability Accounting Management And Policy Journal, 11(3, SI), 591–612, DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2017-0031Search in Google Scholar

31Feleki, E., Moussiopoulos, N., 2021. Setting Emission Reduction Trajectories in Mediterranean Cities with the Use of Science-Based Targets: The Pathway towards Climate Neutrality and the Ambitious European Goals by 2050. ATMOSPHERE, 12(11), DOI: 10.3390/atmos12111505Search in Google Scholar

32Francis, A., Thomas, A., 2020. Exploring the relationship between lean construction and environmental sustainability: A review of existing literature to decipher broader dimensions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 252, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119913Search in Google Scholar

33Gackowiec, P., Podobinska-Staniec, M., Brzychczy Edyta and Kuhlbach, C., Oezver, T., 2020. Review of Key Performance Indicators for Process Monitoring in the Mining Industry. Energies, 13(19), DOI: 10.3390/en13195169Search in Google Scholar

34Garza-Reyes, J. A., 2015a. Green lean and the need for Six Sigma. International Journal Of Lean Six Sigma, 6(3), 226–248, DOI: 10.1108/IJLSS-04-2014-0010 Search in Google Scholar

35Garza-Reyes, J. A., 2015b. Lean and green - a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 102, 18–29, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.064Search in Google Scholar

36Gibassier, D., Michelon, G., Cartel, M., 2020. The future of carbon accounting research: “we’ve pissed mother nature off, big time’’. Sustainability Accounting Management And Policy Journal, 11(3, SI), 477–485, DOI: 10.1108/SAMPJ-02-2020-0028Search in Google Scholar

37Giesekam, J., Norman, J., Garvey, A., Betts-Davies, S., 2021. Science-Based Targets: On Target? Sustainability, 13(4), Doi: 10.3390/Su13041657Search in Google Scholar

38Giesekam, J., Tingley, D. D., Cotton, I., 2018. Aligning carbon targets for construction with (inter)national climate change mitigation commitments. Energy And Buildings, 165, 106–117, DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.01.023Search in Google Scholar

39Goncalves, A., Silva, C., 2021. Looking for Sustainability Scoring in Apparel: A Review on Environmental Footprint, Social Impacts and Transparency. ENERGIES, 14(11), DOI: 10.3390/en14113032Search in Google Scholar

40Govindan, K., Aditi, Darbari, J. D., Kaul Arshia and Jha, P. C., 2021. Structural model for analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturer-supplier collaboration: A grey-decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory-based approach. Business Strategy And The Environment, 30(4), 1702–1722, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2703Search in Google Scholar

41Gunduz, M., Abu-Hijleh, A., 2020. Assessment of Human Productivity Drivers for Construction Labor through Importance Rating and Risk Mapping. Sustainability, 12(20), DOI: 10.3390/su12208614Search in Google Scholar

42Gunduz, M., Lutfi, H. M. A., 2021. Go/No-Go Decision Model for Owners Using Exhaustive CHAID and QUEST Decision Tree Algorithms. Sustainability, 13(2), DOI: 10.3390/su13020815Search in Google Scholar

43Guo, R., Wu, Z., n.d.. Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP-DEMATEL-VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises. Environment Development and Sustainability, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02565-3Search in Google Scholar

44Haddaway, N. R., Page, M. J., Pritchard, C. C., McGuinness, L. A., 2022. PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020-compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 18(2), e1230, DOI: 10.1002/cl2.1230Search in Google Scholar

45Hadziosmanovic, M., Lloyd, S. M., Bjorn, A., Paquin, R. L., Mengis, N., Matthews, H. D., 2022. Using cumulative carbon budgets and corporate carbon disclosure to inform ambitious corporate emissions targets and long-term mitigation pathways. Journal Of Industrial Ecology, 26(5), 1747–1759, DOI: 10.1111/jiec.13322Search in Google Scholar

46Hallam, C., Contreras, C., 2016. Integrating lean and green management. Management Decision, 54(9), 2157–2187, DOI: 10.1108/MD-04-2016-0259Search in Google Scholar

47Hart, M., Austin, W., Acha, S., Le Brun, N., Markides, C. N., Shah, N., 2020. A roadmap investment strategy to reduce carbon intensive refrigerants in the food retail industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123039Search in Google Scholar

48Henao, R., Sarache, W., Gomez, I., 2019. Lean manufacturing and sustainable performance: Trends and future challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 99–116, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.116Search in Google Scholar

49Hristov, I., Appolloni, A., Chirico, A., 2022. The adoption of the key performance indicators to integrate sustainability in the business strategy: A novel five-dimensional framework. Business Strategy And The Environment, 31(7), 3216–3230, DOI: 10.1002/bse.3072Search in Google Scholar

50Immink, H., Louw, R., Garlick, A., Vosper, S., Brent, A., 2022. Country specific low carbon commitments versus equitable and practical company specific decarbonisation targets. Environment Development And Sustainability, 24(8), 10005–10025, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01854-7Search in Google Scholar

51Janjua, S. Y., Sarker, P. K., Biswas, W. K., 2020. Development of triple bottom line indicators for life cycle sustainability assessment of residential bulidings. Journal of Environmental Management, 264, DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110476Search in Google Scholar

52Janjua, S. Y., Sarker, P. K., Biswas, W. K., 2021. Sustainability implications of service life on residential buildings - An application of life cycle sustainability assessment framework. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 10, DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2021.100109Search in Google Scholar

53Johansson, G., Sundin, E., 2014. Lean and green product development: two sides of the same coin? Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 104–121, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.005Search in Google Scholar

54Jose Martinez-Jurado, P., Moyano-Fuentes, J., 2014. Lean Management, Supply Chain Management and Sustainability: A Literature Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 85, 134–150, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.042 Search in Google Scholar

55Karahasanovic, A., Culen, A. L., Skjetne, J. H., Hasle, G., 2020. Key Performance Indicators In Design For Sustainable Rural Transport. Iadis-International Journal On Computer Science And Information Systems, 15(2), 107–122. Search in Google Scholar

56Karnitis, E., Bicevskis, J., Karnitis, G., Pukis, M., 2021. Sustainable Development Model of EU Cities Compliant with UN Settings. Mathematics, 9(22), DOI: 10.3390/math9222888 Search in Google Scholar

57Kassem, E., Trenz, O., 2020. Automated Sustainability Assessment System for Small and Medium Enterprises Reporting. Sustainability, 12(14), DOI: 10.3390/su12145687 Search in Google Scholar

58Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Golpira, H., Sharif, A., Mardani, A., 2021. A state-ofthe-art review and meta-analysis on sustainable supply chain management: Future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123357 Search in Google Scholar

59Kumar, S., Luthra, S., Govindan, K., Kumar Naveen and Haleem, A., 2016. Barriers in green lean six sigma product development process: an ISM approach. Production Planning Control, 27(7–8, SI), 604–620, DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1165307Search in Google Scholar

60Kuo, L., Chang, B.-G., 2021. Ambitious corporate climate action: Impacts of science-based target and internal carbon pricing on carbon management reputation-Evidence from Japan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1830–1840, DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.025Search in Google Scholar

61Leon, H. C. M., Calvo-Amodio, J., 2017. Towards lean for sustainability: Understanding the interrelationships between lean and sustainability from a systems thinking perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142(4), 4384–4402, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.132Search in Google Scholar

62Ma, J., Harstvedt, J. D., Jaradat, R., Smith, B., 2020. Sustainability driven multicriteria project portfolio selection under uncertain decision-making environment. Computers Industrial Engineering, 140, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.106236Search in Google Scholar

63Marotta, I., Guarino, F., Longo, S., Cellura, M., 2021. Environmental Sustainability Approaches and Positive Energy Districts: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 13(23), DOI: 10.3390/su132313063Search in Google Scholar

64Marrucci, L., Daddi, T., 2022. The contribution of the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme to the environmental performance of manufacturing organisations. Business Strategy And The Environment, 31(4), 1347–1357, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2958Search in Google Scholar

65Matlock, M., Christie, M., Thoma, G., 2021. Analysis of Life Cycle Environmental Impacts of Using Enogen Corn in Beef Cattle Rations. ANIMALS, 11(10), DOI: 10.3390/ani11102916Search in Google Scholar

66Matos, R., Rodrigues, F., Rodrigues, H., Costa, A., 2021. Building condition assessment supported by Building Information Modelling. Journal Of Building Engineering, 38, DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102186 Search in Google Scholar

67McGinley, O., Moran, P., Goggins, J., 2022. An Assessment of the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of Energy Efficient Retrofits to Existing Residential Buildings. Energies, 15(1), DOI: 10.3390/en15010334Search in Google Scholar

68Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., Altman, D., Antes, G., Atkins, D., Barbour, V., Barrowman, N., Berlin, J. A., Clark, J., Clarke, M., Cook, D., D’Amico, R., Deeks, J. J., Devereaux, P. J., Dickersin, K., Egger, M., Ernst, E., … Tugwell, P., 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: The PRISMA statement. In PLoS Medicine (Vol. 6, Issue 7), DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097Search in Google Scholar

69Moktadir, M. A., Mahmud, Y., Banaitis, A., Sarder, T., Khan, M. R., 2021. Key Performance Indicators For Adopting Sustainability Practices In Footwear Supply Chains. E M Ekonomie A Management, 24(1), 197–213, DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2021-1-013Search in Google Scholar

70Moktadir, Md. A., Dwivedi, A., Rahman, A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Paul, S. K., Sultana, R., Madaan, J., 2020. An investigation of key performance indicators for operational excellence towards sustainability in the leather products industry. Business Strategy And The Environment, 29(8), 3331–3351, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2575Search in Google Scholar

71Molavi, A., Lim, G. J., Race, B., 2020. A framework for building a smart port and smart port index. International Journal Of Sustainable Transportation, 14(9), 686–700, DOI: 10.1080/15568318.2019.1610919 Mollenkopf, D., Stolze, H., Tate, W. L., Ueltschy, M., 2010. Green, lean, and global supply chains. International Journal Of Physical Distribution Logistics Management, 40(1–2), 14–41, DOI: 10.1108/096000310 11018028Search in Google Scholar

72Morella, P., Lamban, M. P., Royo, J., Sanchez, J. C., Ng Corrales, L. del C., 2020. Development of a New Green Indicator and Its Implementation in a Cyber-Physical System for a Green Supply Chain. Sustainability, 12(20), DOI: 10.3390/su12208629 Search in Google Scholar

73Morella, P., Pilar Lamban, M., Royo, J., Carlos Sanchez, J., 2022. Evaluating the impact of new trends in urban freight transportation attending the triple bottom line: A case study. Computers Industrial Engineering, 174, DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2022.108756 Search in Google Scholar

74Mosca, F., Perini, K., 2022. Reviewing the Role of Key Performance Indicators in Architectural and Urban Design Practices. Sustainability, 14(21), DOI: 10.3390/su142114464 Search in Google Scholar

75Naji, K., Gunduz, M., Salat, F., 2021. Assessment of preconstruction factors in sustainable project management performance. Engineering Construction And Architectural Management, 28(10), 3060–3077, DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-05-2020-0333Search in Google Scholar

76Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., Hamaidi, M. F., 2022. Major Factors Affecting Construction Waste Management in Infrastructure Projects Using Structural Equation Model. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 148(10), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002358Search in Google Scholar

77Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M., Naser, A. F., 2022. The Effect of Change-Order Management Factors on Construction Project Success: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 148(9), DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002350Search in Google Scholar

78Nawaz, R., Hussain, I., Noor, S., Habib Tufail and Omair, M., 2020. The significant impact of the economic sustainability on the cement industry by the assessment of the key performance indicators using Taguchi signal to noise ratio. Cogent Engineering, 7(1), DOI: 10.1080/23311916.2020. 1810383Search in Google Scholar

79O’Flynn, C., Seymour, V., Crawshaw, J., Parrott, T., Reeby, C., Silva, S. R. P., 2021. The Road to Net Zero: A Case Study of Innovative Technologies and Policy Changes Used at a Medium-Sized University to Achieve C-zero by 2030. Sustainability, 13(17), DOI: 10.3390/su13179954Search in Google Scholar

80Othman, A., El-gazzar, S., Knez, M., 2022. A Framework for Adopting a Sustainable Smart Sea Port Index. Sustainability, 14(8), DOI: 10.3390/su14084551Search in Google Scholar

81Patidar, A., Sharma, M., Agrawal, R., Sangwan, K. S., n.d.. Supply chain resilience and its key performance indicators: an evaluation under Industry 4.0 and sustainability perspective. Management Of Environmental Quality, DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-03-2022-0091Search in Google Scholar

82Patil, H. R., Javalagi, C. M., 2020. Analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing in sugar industry using analytical hierarchy process. Indian Journal Of Engineering And Materials Sciences, 27(4), 959–963.Search in Google Scholar

83Patrao, C., Moura, P., de Almeida, A. T., 2020. Review of Smart City Assessment Tools. Smart Cities, 3(4), 1117–1132, DOI: 10.3390/smartcities 3040055Search in Google Scholar

84Perroni, M. G., Tortato, U., da Silva, W. V., da Veiga, C. P., Senff, C. O., 2020. Analytical method for sustainability science benchmarking: An indicator decomposition approach. Ecological Indicators, 116, DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106470Search in Google Scholar

85Pignatelli, M., Moghadam, S. T., Genta, C., Lombardi, P., 2023. Spatial decision support system for low-carbon sustainable cities development: An interactive storytelling dashboard for the city of Turin. Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104310Search in Google Scholar

86Pribicevic, I., Delibasic, B., 2021. Critical sustainability indicators identification and cause-effect relationships analysis for sustainable organization strategy based on fuzzy Dematel. Environment Development And Sustainability, 23(12), 17263–17304, DOI: 10.1007/s10668-021-01360-wSearch in Google Scholar

87Radovanovic, D., Hoist, C., Belur, S. B., Srivastava, R., Houngbonon, G. V., Le Quentrec Erwan and Miliza, J., Winkler, A. S., Noll, J., 2020. Digital Literacy Key Performance Indicators for Sustainable Development. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 151–167, DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2587Search in Google Scholar

88Rahman, T., Moktadir, M. A., Paul, S. K., 2022. Key performance indicators for a sustainable recovery strategy in healthcare supply chains: COVID-19 pandemic perspective. Journal Of Asia Business Studies, 16(3, SI), 472–494, DOI: 10.1108/JABS-05-2021-0200Search in Google Scholar

89Reavis, M., Ahlen, J., Rudek, J., Naithani, K., 2022. Evaluating Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Mitigation Goals of the Global Food and Beverage Sector. Frontiers In Sustainable Food Systems, 5, DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2021.789499Search in Google Scholar

90Romeni, G., Appio, F. P., Martini, A., Mercat, B., Jean-Marie, A., Joubert, C., 2020. Enhancing Ecoinnovation Performance: Evidence From a Water Footprint Assessment in the Manufacturing Industry. IEEE Transactions On Engineering Management, 67(3), 724–739, DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2893968Search in Google Scholar

91Sangwa, N. R., Sangwan, K. S., 2018. Leanness assessment of organizational performance: a systematic literature review. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(5), 768–788, DOI: 10.1108/JMTM-09-2017-0196Search in Google Scholar

92Schipper, C. A., Dekker, G. G. J., de Visser, B., Bolman, B., Lodder, Q., 2021. Characterization of SDGs towards Coastal Management: Sustainability Performance and Cross-Linking Consequences. Sustainability, 13(3), DOI: 10.3390/su13031560Search in Google Scholar

93Seuring, S., Müller, M., 2008. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699–1710, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020 Search in Google Scholar

94Sharma, V., Raut, R. D., Mangla, S. K., Narkhede, B. E., Luthra, S., Gokhale, R., 2021. A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management. Business Strategy and The Environment, 30(2), 1191–1212, DOI: 10.1002/bse.2679Search in Google Scholar

95Siegel, R., Antony, J., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Cherrafi, A., Lameijer, B., 2019. Integrated green lean approach and sustainability for SMEs: From literature review to a conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118205Search in Google Scholar

96Souza Farias, L. M., Santos, L. C., Gohr, C. F., de Oliveira, L. C., da Silva Amorim, M. H., 2019. Criteria and practices for lean and green performance assessment: Systematic review and conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 218, 746–762, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.042Search in Google Scholar

97Spanner, M. M., Wein, J., 2020. Carbon risk real estate monitor: making decarbonisation in the real estate sector measurable. Journal Of European Real Estate Research, 13(3, SI), 277–299, DOI: 10.1108/JERER-05-2020-0031Search in Google Scholar

98Stoknes, P. E., Rockstrom, J., 2018. Redefining green growth within planetary boundaries. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 41–49, DOI: 10.1016/J.Erss.2018.04.030Search in Google Scholar

99Sun, S., Ertz, M., 2021. Dynamic evolution of ride-hailing platforms from a systemic perspective: Forecasting financial sustainability. Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies, 125, DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103003Search in Google Scholar

100Torabizadeh, M., Yusof, N. M., Ma’aram, A., Shaharoun, A. M., 2020. Identifying sustainable warehouse management system indicators and proposing new weighting method. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119190Search in Google Scholar

101Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P., 2003. Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. In British Journal of Management 14(3), 207–222, DOI: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375 Search in Google Scholar

102van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538, DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3Search in Google Scholar

103Varela, L., Araujo, A., Avila, P., Castro Helio and Putnik, G., 2019. Evaluation of the Relation between Lean Manufacturing, Industry 4.0, and Sustainability. Sustainability, 11(5), DOI: 10.3390/su11051439Search in Google Scholar

104Viglia, G., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Joshi, Y., 2022. Forty years of The Service Industries Journal: a bibliometric review. Service Industries Journal, 42(1–2), 1–20, DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2021.2003341Search in Google Scholar

105von Geibler, J., Liedtke, C., Wallbaum, H., Schaller, S., 2006. Accounting for the social dimension of sustainability: Experiences from the biotechnology industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(5), 334–346, DOI: 10.1002/bse.540Search in Google Scholar

106Voukkali, I., Loizia, P., Navarro Pedreno, J., Zorpas, A. A., 2021. Urban strategies evaluation for waste management in coastal areas in the framework of area metabolism. Waste Management Research, 39(3, SI), 448–465, DOI: 10.1177/0734242X20972773Search in Google Scholar

107Walenta, J., 2020. Climate risk assessments and science-based targets: A review of emerging private sector climate action tools. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Climate Change, 11(2), DOI: 10.1002/wcc.628 Search in Google Scholar

108Walkiewicz, J., Lay-Kumar, J., Herzig, C., 2021. The integration of sustainability and externalities into the “corporate DNA’’: a practice-oriented approach. Corporate Governance-The International Journal of Business In Society, 21(3, SI), 479–496, DOI: 10.1108/CG-06-2020-0244Search in Google Scholar

109Watari, T., Nansai, K., Nakajima, K., 2021. Contraction and convergence of in use metal stocks to meet climate goals. Global Environmental Change-Human And Policy Dimensions, 69, DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102284Search in Google Scholar

110Yilan, G., Cordella, M., Morone, P., 2022. Evaluating and managing the sustainability of investments in green and sustainable chemistry: An overview of sustainable finance approaches and tools. Current Opinion In Green And Sustainable Chemistry, 36, DOI: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100635Search in Google Scholar

111Zaripov, R. N., Murakaev, I. M., Ryapukhin V, A., 2021. Development of the Organization’s Key Performance Indicators System in Order to Improve the Effectiveness of Its Human Capital and Risk Management. Tem Journal-Technology Education Management Informatics, 10(1), 298–302, DOI: 10.18421/TEM101-37 Search in Google Scholar