Challenges of Digitalisation in Judicial System

1. Aletras, N., Tsarapatsanis, D., Preoţiuc-Pietro, D., & Lampos, V. (eds). (2016). Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective. Peer J Computer Science 2: e93. AletrasN. TsarapatsanisD. Preoţiuc-PietroD. LamposV. (eds). 2016 Predicting judicial decisions of the European Court of Human Rights: a Natural Language Processing perspective Peer J Computer Science 2 e93 Search in Google Scholar

2. Barraud, B. (2017). Un algorithme capable de prédire les décisions des juges: vers une robotisation de la justice? Les Cahiers de la Justice, 2017/1, pp. 121–139. BarraudB. 2017 Un algorithme capable de prédire les décisions des juges: vers une robotisation de la justice? Les Cahiers de la Justice 2017/1 121 139 Search in Google Scholar

3. Classification module. Equivant. Available: https://www.equivant.com/classification/ Classification module Equivant Available: https://www.equivant.com/classification/ Search in Google Scholar

4. Contini, F., Lanzara, G. F. (eds). (2017). The elusive mediation between law and technology’ in P. Branco, N. Hosen, M. Leone and R. Mohr (eds). Tools of Meaning: Representation, Objects, and Agency in the Technologies of Law and Religion, I Saggi di Lexia, Aracne, Rome, 2018, pp. 4–9. ContiniF. LanzaraG. F. (eds). 2017 The elusive mediation between law and technology’ in BrancoP. HosenN. LeoneM. MohrR. (eds) Tools of Meaning: Representation, Objects, and Agency in the Technologies of Law and Religion I Saggi di Lexia, Aracne Rome 2018 4 9 Search in Google Scholar

5. Council of Europe. (2018). Algorithms and human rights: Study on the human rights dimensions of automated data processing techniques and possible regulatory implications. English edition. Available: https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-en-rev/16807956b5 Council of Europe 2018 Algorithms and human rights: Study on the human rights dimensions of automated data processing techniques and possible regulatory implications English edition Available: https://rm.coe.int/algorithms-and-human-rights-en-rev/16807956b5 Search in Google Scholar

6. Council of Europe. (2018). European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment. Available: https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c Council of Europe 2018 European Ethical Charter on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Judicial Systems and their environment Available: https://rm.coe.int/ethical-charter-en-for-publication-4-december-2018/16808f699c Search in Google Scholar

7. Craford, K. (2016). Artificial Intelligence’s White Guy Problem. The New York Times, June 25, 2016. CrafordK. 2016 Artificial Intelligence’s White Guy Problem The New York Times June 25 2016 Search in Google Scholar

8. ECHR, 28 June 2007, No. 76240/01, Wagner et J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg. ECHR 28 June 2007 No. 76240/01, Wagner et J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg Search in Google Scholar

9. ECHR, 27 May 2010, No. 18811/02, Hohenzoblernc v. Roumanie, pt. 43. ECHR 27 May 2010 No. 18811/02, Hohenzoblernc v. Roumanie pt. 43. Search in Google Scholar

10. European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence and amending certain Union Legislative Acts. COM (2021) 206 final 2021/0106 (COD). European Commission 2021 Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Laying down harmonised rules on Artificial Intelligence and amending certain Union Legislative Acts COM (2021) 206 final 2021/0106 (COD). Search in Google Scholar

11. European Commission. (2020). White Paper On Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust. COM (2020) 65 final. European Commission 2020 White Paper On Artificial Intelligence – A European approach to excellence and trust COM (2020) 65 final. Search in Google Scholar

12. Fair Trials. Automatic injustice: The use of artificial intelligence & automated decision-making systems in criminal justice in Europe, pp.11–12. Available: https://policehumanrightsresources.org/content/uploads/2021/09/Automating_Injustice.pdf?x19059 Fair Trials Automatic injustice: The use of artificial intelligence & automated decision-making systems in criminal justice in Europe 11 12 Available: https://policehumanrightsresources.org/content/uploads/2021/09/Automating_Injustice.pdf?x19059 Search in Google Scholar

13. Ferrié, S.-M. (2018). Les algorithmes à l’épreuve du droit au procès equitable. Procédures, No. 4, Avril 2018, pp. 4–9. FerriéS.-M. 2018 Les algorithmes à l’épreuve du droit au procès equitable Procédures 4 Avril 2018 4 9 Search in Google Scholar

14. Garapon, A. (2017). Les enjeux de la justice prédictive. La Semaine Juridique. Edition générale, No. 1–2, 9 janvier 2017. GaraponA. 2017 Les enjeux de la justice prédictive La Semaine Juridique Edition générale 1–2 9 janvier 2017 Search in Google Scholar

15. Meneceur, Y. (2018). Quel avenir pour la “justice prédictive”? La Semaine Juridique. Edition générale, No. 7, 12 février 2018, pp. 316–322. MeneceurY. 2018 Quel avenir pour la “justice prédictive”? La Semaine Juridique Edition générale 7 12 février 2018 316 322 Search in Google Scholar

16. Sauvé, J.-M. La justice prédictive, Colloque organisé à l’occasion du bicentenaire de l’Ordre des avocats au Conseil d’Etat et à la Cour de cassation, Cour de cassation (12. 02.2018). SauvéJ.-M. La justice prédictive, Colloque organisé à l’occasion du bicentenaire de l’Ordre des avocats au Conseil d’Etat et à la Cour de cassation Cour de cassation (12. 02.2018). Search in Google Scholar

17. Surden, H. (2014). Machine Learning and Law. Wash. L. Rev. 89:87, 87–90. SurdenH. 2014 Machine Learning and Law Wash. L. Rev 89 87 87 90 Search in Google Scholar

18. The UK International Consumer Centre. Available: https://www.odrcontactpoint.uk/ The UK International Consumer Centre Available: https://www.odrcontactpoint.uk/ Search in Google Scholar