Accesso libero

Analytical approach to the influence of motivation on the dynamics of heterogeneous employees and expected average costs of efficient work

INFORMAZIONI SU QUESTO ARTICOLO

Cita

Askar, S.S. (2018). Tripoly Stackelberg game model: One leader versus two followers. Applied Mathematics and Computation. Elsevier. vol. 328(C). pp. 301-311.10.1016/j.amc.2018.01.041 Search in Google Scholar

Britta Kallevang. (2018). 14 Rypical Typical Types of Workers In An Office. https://www.lifehack.org/416651/14-typical-types-of-workers-in-an-office-which-one-are-you Search in Google Scholar

Carl P. Simon, Lawrence Blum. (1994). Mathematics for Economists. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc Search in Google Scholar

Carloe Gaskell. (2016) The nine types of employees – and how to motivate them. https://www.theguardian.com/careers/2016/may/17/the-nine-types-of-employees-and-how-to-motivate-them Search in Google Scholar

Chong, Kim W., Harlan Smith, II, Andrew Sikula, Sr., and Lorraine P. Anderson. (2011). “The Key Characteristics of Different Types of Employees: A Summary of Six Studies.” American Journal of Business 26, No. 1, pp. 26-39. Search in Google Scholar

David Besanko and David S. Sibley. (1991). Compensation and Transfer Pricing in a Principal-Agent Model. International Economic Review Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 55-68. Published By: Wiley https://www.jstor.org/stable/2526931?seq=110.2307/2526931 Search in Google Scholar

Derek Heim. (2017). 4 Types of Workers, and How to Manage them, https://hub.appirio.com/blogs/4-types-of-workers-and-how-to-manage-them Search in Google Scholar

Dick Finnegan. (2014). How much Does Employee Engagement Correlate With Profitability? SHRM Annual Conference Analytics Rethinking Retention and Engagement. Orlando, Florida. Search in Google Scholar

George P. Allen, W. Mark Moore, Lynette R. Moser, Kathryn K. Neill, Usha Sambamoorthi & Hershey S. Bell. (2016). The Role of Servant Leadership and Transformational Leadership in Academic Pharmacy. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 80 (7) 113; DOI: https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe80711310.5688/ajpe807113 Search in Google Scholar

H. Scott Bierman and Luis Fernandez. (1993). Game Theory with Economic Applications. Chapter 7. Involuntary Unemployment, pp. 119 – 128 Search in Google Scholar

Katerina Stankova and Geert Jan Olsder. (2013). Inverse Stackelberg Games versus Adverse-Selection Principal-Agent Model Theory. Delft University of Technology. Delft Institute of Applied Mathematics Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science Search in Google Scholar

Luis E. Romero. (2016). The 3 Basis Types of Employees: A Simple Guide for Leaders and HR Professionals. Forbes Search in Google Scholar

Miller G.J., Menard C. and Shirley M.M. (2005). Solutions to Principal-Agent Problems in Firms. Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-25092-1_1510.1007/0-387-25092-1_15 Search in Google Scholar

Robert Kopal and Darija Korku. (2011). Game Theory – practical application in business. Comminus d.o.o. and VPŠ Libertas. ISBN 9789535664406. Search in Google Scholar

Sanchez Carrera EJ and Pavlinović S. (2013). Evolution of the Place Attachment: An Economic Approach. Croatian Operational Research Review, 4:109 – 119 Search in Google Scholar

Shahnazz Aziz, Karl L. Wuensch and Howard R. Brandon. (2010). A comparison Among Worker Types Using a Composite Approach and Median Splits; Department of Psychology East Carolina University Greenville USA. Volume 60; Issue 4. pp. 627 – 642 Search in Google Scholar

Shouvik Sanyal and Mohammed Wamique Hisam. (2018). The Impact of Teamwork on Work Performance of Employees: A Study of Faculty Members in Dhofar University. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM) e-ISSN: 2278-487X, p-ISSN: 2319-7668. Volume 20, Issue 3. Ver. I. PP 15-22 http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol20-issue3/Version-1/C2003011522.pdf Search in Google Scholar

V. Kumar, Anita Pansari. (2015). Measuring the Benefits of Employee Engagement. MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. 56, No.4 Search in Google Scholar