[Aaviksoo, K 1995, ‘Simulating vegetation dynamics and land use
in a mire landscape using a Markov model’, Landscape and
Urban Planning, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 129–142.10.1016/0169-2046(94)01045-A]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allen, TFH & Hoekstra, TW 1992, Toward a unified ecology,
Columbia University Press, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Allen, TFH & Starr, TB 1982, Hierarchy: perspectives for
ecological complexity, University Press, Chicago, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ares, J., Bertiller, M & del Valle, H 2001, ‘Functional and
structural landscape indicators of intensification, resilience
and resistance in agroecosystems in southern Argentina
based on remotely sensed data‘, Landscape Ecol., vol. 16,
no. 3, pp. 221–234.10.1023/A:1011172006029]Search in Google Scholar
[
Auger, P & Lett, C 2003, ‘Integrative biology: linking levels of
organization’, Comptes Rendus Biologie, vol. 326, no. 5, pp.
517–522.10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00115-X]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barsch, H 1979, ‘W sprawie pojęć dotyczących powłoki ziemskiej
i jej przestrzennego rozczłonkowania w terminologii nauki
o krajobrazie’ [On the concepts of the Earth surface and its
spatial fragmentation in the terminology of the landscape
science], Przegląd Zagranicznej Literatury Geograficznej,
vol. 2, pp. 9–15.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bailey, RG 1987, ‘Suggested hierarchy of criteria for multiscale
ecosystem mapping’, Landscape and Urban Planning,
vol.14, pp. 313–319.10.1016/0169-2046(87)90042-9]Search in Google Scholar
[
Benito-Calvo, A, Pérez-González, A, Magri, O & Meza, P 2009,
‘Assessing regional geodiversity: the Iberian Peninsula’,
Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, vol. 34, pp. 1433–1445.10.1002/esp.1840]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bertalanffy von, L 1976, General system theory: foundations,
development, applications, (Pub) George Braziller.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bissonette, JA, 1997, ‘Scale-sensitive ecological properties:
historical context, current meaning’ in Wildlife and landscape
ecology: effects of pattern and scale, ed JA Bissonette,
Springer-Verlag, New York, USA, pp. 3–15.10.1007/978-1-4612-1918-7_1]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blaschke, T & Petch, J 1999, ‘Landscape structure and scale:
comparative studies on some landscape indices in Germany
and the UK’ in Heterogeneity in landscape ecology: pattern
and scale eds M Maudsley & J Marshall, IALE UK, Bristol,
pp. 75–84.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bugmann, H, Lindner, M, Lasch, P, Flechsig, M, Ebert, B & Cramer,
W 2000, ‘Scaling issues in forest succession modelling’,
Climatic Change, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 265–289.10.1023/A:1005603011956]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cadenasso, ML, Pickett, STA, Weathers, KC, Bell, SS, Benning,
TL, Carreir, MM & Dawson, TE 2003a, ‘An interdisciplinary
and synthetic approach to ecological boundaries’,
BioScience, vol. 53, pp. 717–722.10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0717:AIASAT]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cadenasso, ML, Pickett, STA, Weathers, KC & Jones, CG
2003b, ‘A framework for a theory of ecological boundaries’,
BioScience, vol. 53, pp. 750–758.10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0750:AFFATO]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chmielewski, T 2008, ‘Zmierzając ku ogólnej teorii systemów
krajobrazowych’ [Towards a general theory of landscape
systems], The Problems of Landscape Ecology, vol. 21, pp.
93–108.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Corenblit, D, Baas, ACW, Bornette, G, Darrozes, J, Delmotte, S,
Francis, RA, Gurnell, AM, Julien, F, Niman, RJ & Steiger, J
2011, ‘Feedbacks between geomorphology and biota
controlling Earth surface processes and landforms: A review
of foundation concepts and current understandings’, Earth
Science Reviews, vol. 106, pp. 307–331.10.1016/j.earscirev.2011.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cushman, SA & McGarigal, K 2002, ‘Hierarchical, multi-scale
decomposition of species-environment relationships’,
Landscape Ecol., vol. 17, pp. 637–646.10.1023/A:1021571603605]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dungan, JL, Perry, JN, Dale, MRT, Legendre, P, Citron-Pousty,
S, Fortin, MJ, Jakomulska, A, Miriti, M & Rosenberg, MS
2002, ‘A balanced view of scale in spatial statistical analysis’,
Ecography, vol. 25, pp. 626–640.10.1034/j.1600-0587.2002.250510.x]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farina, A 2000, Landscape ecology in action, Springer, pp. 317.10.1007/978-94-011-4082-9]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fjellstad, WJ & Dramstad, WE, 1999. ‘Patterns of change in two
contrasting Norwegian agricultural landscapes’, Landscape
Urban, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 177–191.10.1016/S0169-2046(99)00055-9]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fischer, J, Lindenmayer, DB, Fazey, I 2004, ‘Appreciating
ecological complexity: habitat contours as a conceptual
landscape model’, Conserv. Biol., vol. 18, pp. 1245–1253.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00263.x]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forman, RTT & Godron, M 1986, Landscape Ecology, John Wiley
and Sons, Inc., New York, USA.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forman, RTT & Moore, PN 1992, ‘Theoretical foundations
for understanding boundaries in landscape mosaics’, in
Landscape Boundaries, eds AJ Hansen & F di Castri,
Ecological Studies, vol. 92, Springer, New York, pp. 236–258.10.1007/978-1-4612-2804-2_11]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forman, RTT 1995, Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes
and Regions, Cambridge University Press, New York.10.1017/9781107050327]Search in Google Scholar
[
Garrett, KA & Dixon, PM 1997, ‘Environmental pseudointeraction:
the effects of ignoring the scale of environmental
heterogeneity in competition studies’, Theor. Popul. Biol.,
vol. 51, pp. 37–48.10.1006/tpbi.1997.1295]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibson, CC, Ostrom, E & Ahn, TK 2000, ‘The concept of scale
and the human dimensions of global change: a survey’,
Ecological Economics, vol. 32, pp. 217–239.10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00092-0]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hansen, AJ & di Castri, F (eds) 1992, Landscape boundaries.
Consequences for biotic diversity and ecological flows,
Springer-Verlag, New York.10.1007/978-1-4612-2804-2]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hay, GJ, Dubé, P, Bouchard, A & Marceau, DJ 2002, ‘A scalespace
primer for exploring and quantifying complex
landscapes’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 27–49.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00500-2]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hearnshaw, EJS, Cullen, R & Hughey, KFD, An ecological
concept determined by economic means. Commerce
division, Lincoln University, environment, society and design
division, Lincoln University. Available from: http://www.een.
anu.edu.au/e05prpap/hearnshaw.doc [2012.04.02].]Search in Google Scholar
[
King, AW 1991, ‘Translating models across scales in the
landscape’, in Quantitative methods in landscape ecology:
the analysis and interpretation of landscape heterogeneity,
eds MG Turner & RH Gardner, Springer, vol. 82, New York,
pp. 470–517.10.1007/978-1-4757-4244-2_19]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolasa, J 2006, ‘A community ecology perspective on variability in
complex systems: The effects of hierarchy and integration’,
Ecological Complexity, vol. 3, pp. 71–79.10.1016/j.ecocom.2005.08.001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kolasa, J & Zalewski, M 1995, ‘Notes on ecotone attributes and
functions’, Hydrobiologia, vol. 303, pp. 1–7.10.1007/978-94-017-3360-1_1]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kondracki, J & Richling, A 1983, ‘Próba uporządkowania
terminologii w zakresie geografii fizycznej kompleksowej’
[An attempt to organize the terms in comprehensive physical
geography], Przegl. Geogr. vol. 55, no. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kostrzewski, A 2011, ‘The role of relief geodiversity in
geomorphology’, Geographica Polonica, vol. 84, Spatial
Issue, part 2, pp. 60–74.10.7163/GPol.2011.S2.5]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kozłowski, S 2004, ‘Geodiversity. The concept and scope of
geodiversity’, Przegl. Geol., vol. 52, no.8/2.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kozłowski, S, Migaszewski, Z & Gałuszka, A 2004, ‘Znaczenie
georóżnorodności w holistycznej wizji przyrody’ [The
importance of geodiversity in the holistic vision of nature],
Przegl. Geol., vol. 52, no. 4.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lechnio, J & Richling, A 2005, ‘Model funkcjonowania krajobrazu
- ocena dynamiki z zastosowaniem analizy przepływów’
[Model of the landscape functioning - evaluation of dynamics
using flow analysis] in Z Problematyki Funkcjonowania
Krajobrazów Nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of
the lowland landscapes], eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR
UW, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leser, H & Nagel, P 1998, ‘Landscape diversity – a holistic
approach’ in Biodiversity. A Challenge for Development Research and Policy, eds W Barthloff & M Wininger, Berlin –
Heidelberg – New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levin, SA 1992, ‘The problem of pattern and scale in ecology’,
Ecology, vol. 73, pp. 1943–1967.10.2307/1941447]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindenmayer, D, Hobbs, RJ, Montague-Drake, R, Alexandra, J,
Bennett, A, Burgman, M, Cale, P, Calhoun, A, Cramer,
V, Cullen, P, Driscoll, D, Fahrig, L, Fischer, J, Franklin, J,
Haila, Y, Hunter, M, Gibbons, P, Lake, S, Luck, G,
MacGregor, C, McIntyre, S, Nally, RM, Manning, A,
Miller, J, Mooney, H, Noss, R, Possingham, H,
Saunders, D, Schmiegelow, F, Scott, M, Simberloff, D,
Sisk, T, Tabor, G, Walker, B, Wiens, J, Woinarski, J &
Zavaleta, E 2008, ‘A checklist for ecological management
of landscapes for conservation’, Ecology Letters, vol. 11,
pp. 78–91.10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01114.x17927771]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mander, Ü, Müller, F & Wrbka, T 2005, ‘Functional and structural
landscape indicators: Upscaling and downscaling problems’,
Ecological Indicators, vol. 5, pp. 267–272.10.1016/j.ecolind.2005.04.001]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manning, AD, Lindenmayer, DB & Nix, HA 2004, ‘Continua and
umwelt: novel perspectives on viewing landscapes’, Oikos,
vol. 104, pp. 621–628.10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12813.x]Search in Google Scholar
[
Manson, SM 2008, ‘Does scale exist? An epistemological scale
continuum for complex human-environment systems’,
Geoforum, vol. 39, pp. 776–788.10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.09.010]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marceau, D 1999, ‘The scale issue in social and natural sciences’,
Can. J. Remote Sensing, vol. 25, pp. 347–356.10.1080/07038992.1999.10874734]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marceau, DJ & Hay, GJ 1999 ‘Contributions of remote sensing to
the scale issues’, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, vol.
25, pp. 357–366.10.1080/07038992.1999.10874735]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marušič, J 1999, ‘Landscape typology as a basis for landscape
protection and development’, Agriculturae Conseptus
Stientificus, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 269–274.]Search in Google Scholar
[
McConnell, W 2002, ‘Meeting in the middle: The challenge of
meso-level integration’, LUCC Report Series No. 5, Land
Use Policy, vol. 19, pp. 99–101.10.1016/S0264-8377(01)00042-4]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGarigal, K & Marks, BJ 1995, FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern
analysis program for quantifying landscape structure, USDA
For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW.10.2737/PNW-GTR-351]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGarigal, K, Tagil, S & Cushman, SA 2009, ‘Surface metrics:
An alternative to patch metrics for the quantification of
landscape structure’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 24, pp. 433–
450.10.1007/s10980-009-9327-y]Search in Google Scholar
[
McIntyre, S & Hobbs, R 1999, ‘A framework for conceptualizing
human effects on landscapes and its relevance to
management and research models’, Conserv. Biol., vol. 13,
pp. 1282–1292.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.97509.x]Search in Google Scholar
[
Melbourne, BA & Chesson, P 2005, ‘Scaling up population
dynamics: integrating theory and data’, Oecologia, vol. 145,
no. 2, pp. 179–187.10.1007/s00442-005-0058-8]Search in Google Scholar
[
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2003, Ecosystems and
Human Well-Being: A Framework For Assessment,
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Series. Island Press.
Műller, F 1998, ‘Gradients in ecological systems’, Ecological
Modelling, vol. 108, pp. 3–21.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, J-P, Ratzé, C, Gillet, F & Stoffel, K 2011, Modeling And
Simulating Hierarchies Using An Agent-Based Approach,
MODSIM 2011. Available from: http://www.mssanz.org.
au/ [2012.04.02].]Search in Google Scholar
[
Müller, F, Hoffmann-Kroll, R & Wiggering, H 2000, ‘Indicating
ecosystem integrity–theoretical concepts and environmental
requirements’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 130, pp. 13–23.10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00210-6]Search in Google Scholar
[
Naveh, Z 2001, ‘Ten major premises for a holistic conception
of multifunctional landscapes’, Landscape and Urban
Planning, vol. 57, pp. 269–284.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00209-2]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nicolis, G & Prigogine, I 1989, Exploring complexity: An
introduction, Freeman.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Norowi Mohd, H, Perry, JN, Powell, W & Rennolls, K 2000,
‘The effect of spatial scale on the interactions between
two weevils and their parasitoid’, Ecol. Entomol., vol. 25,
pp. 188–196.10.1046/j.1365-2311.2000.00242.x]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Neill, RV & King, AW 1998, ‘Homage to St. Michael; or why are
there so many books on scale?’ in Ecological scale: theory
and applications, eds DL Peterson & VT Parker, Columbia
University Press, New York, pp 3–16.]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Neill, RV, DeAngelis, D, Waide, J & Allen, TFH 1986, A
hierarchical concept of ecosystems, Princeton University
Press, Princeton.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Papadimitriou, F 2002, ‘Modelling indicators and indices of
landscape complexity: an approach using GIS’, Ecological
Indicators, vol. 2, pp. 17–25.10.1016/S1470-160X(02)00052-3]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peters, DPC & Havstad KM 2006, ‘Nonlinear dynamics in arid
and semi-arid systems: Interactions among drivers and
processes across scales’, Journal of Arid Environments, vol.
65, pp. 196–206.10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.05.010]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peterson, GD 2000, ‘Scaling ecological dynamics: selforganization,
hierarchical structure, and ecological
resilience’, Climatic Change, vol. 44, pp. 291–309.10.1023/A:1005502718799]Search in Google Scholar
[
Peterson, DL & Parker, VT (eds) 1998, Ecological scale: theory
and methods, Columbia Univ. Press, pp. 289–307.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pickett, STA 1989, ‘Space-for-Time Substitution as an Alternative
to Long-Term Studies’, in Long-term studies in ecology.
Approaches and alternatives, ed GE Likens, Springer-
Verlag, New York Inc., USA, pp. 110-135.10.1007/978-1-4615-7358-6_5]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pickup, G, Chewings, VH & Nelson, DJ 1993. ‘Estimating
changes in vegetation cover over time in arid rangelands
using Landsat MSS data’, Remote Sens. Environ., vol. 43,
pp. 243–263.10.1016/0034-4257(93)90069-A]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pietrzak, M 2009, ‘Aktualne i nieaktualne problemy ekologii
krajobrazu’ [Current and outdated problems of landscape
ecology], The Problems of Landscape Ecology , vol. 23, pp.
11–18.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Powell, DC 2000, Potential vegetation, disturbance, plant
succession, and other aspects of forest ecology, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reynolds, JF & Wu, J 1999, ‘Do landscape structural and
functional units exist?’ in Integrating Hydrology, Ecosystem
Dynamics, and Biogeochemistry in Complex Landscapes,
eds JD Tenhunen & P Kabat, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richling, A 1992, Kompleksowa geografia fizyczna [Complex
physical geography], Wyd. Nauk. PWN, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richling, A (ed) 1993, Metody szczegółowych badań geografii
fizycznej [Methods of detailed studies of physical
geography], PWN, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richling, A 2004, ‘Systemy przyrodniczego podziału przestrzeni’
[The systems of natural delimitation of space], The Problems
of Landscape Ecology, vol. 14, pp. 17–22.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richling, A & Lechnio, J (eds) 2005, Z problematyki funkcjonowania
krajobrazów nizinnych [On the problems of functioning of the
lowland landscapes], WGSR UW, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richling, A & Lechnio, J 2005, Koncepcja krajobrazu – operatory i
indykatory ewolucji systemów przyrodniczych [Conception of
the landscape – drivers and indicators of systems evolution]
in Z problematyki funkcjonowania krajobrazów nizinnych
[On the problems of functioning of the lowland landscapes],
eds A Richling & J Lechnio, WGSR UW, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richling, A & Solon, J 2011, Ekologia krajobrazu [Landscape
Ecology], Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider ED & Kay, JJ 1994, Life as a manifestation of the
second law of thermodynamics, Mathl. Comput. Modeling,
vol. 19, no 6–8, pp. 25–48.10.1016/0895-7177(94)90188-0]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schneider, DC 2001, ‘The Rise of the Concept of Scale in
Ecology’, BioScience, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 545–553.10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0545:TROTCO]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[
Solon, J 2009, ‘O potrzebie standaryzacji badań ekologicznokrajobrazowych
dla celów praktycznych’ [About the need
for standardization of landscape-ecological research for
practical purposes], The problems of landscape Ecology,
vol. 23, pp. 19–28.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steele, JH 1991, ‘Can ecological theory cross the land-sea
boundary?’, Journal of Theoretical Biology, vol. 153, pp.
425–436.10.1016/S0022-5193(05)80579-X]Search in Google Scholar
[
Steinhardt, U & Volk, M 2003, ‘Meso-scale landscape analysis
based on landscape balance investigations: problems and
hierarchical approaches for their resolution’, Ecological
Modelling, vol. 168, pp. 251–265.10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00140-6]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strayer, DL, Power, ME, Fagan, WF, Pickett, STA & Belnap J
2003, ‘A classification of ecological boundaries’, BioScience,
vol. 53, pp. 723–729.10.1641/0006-3568(2003)053[0723:ACOEB]2.0.CO;2]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tallis, HT, Ricketts, T, Guerry, AD, Wood, SA, Sharp, R, Nelson,
E, Ennaanay, D,Wolny, S, Olwero, N, Vigerstol,
K, Pennington, D, Mendoza, G, Aukema, J, Foster,
J, Forrest, J, Cameron, D, Arkema, K, Lonsdorf, E, Kennedy,
C, Verutes, G, Kim, CK, Guannel, G, Papenfus, M, Toft,
J, Marsik, M, Bernhardt, J, Griffin, R, Głowiński,
K, Chaumont, N, Perelman, A & Lacayo, M 2013, InVEST
2.5.6 User’s guide. The natural capital project, Stanford.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, MG, Gardner, RH & O’Neill, RV 1995, ‘Ecological
Dynamics at Broad Scales. Ecosystem and Landscapes’,
BioScience, vol. 45, Supplement: science and biodiversity
policy, pp. 29–35.10.2307/1312440]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, MG 1989, ‘Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on
process’, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution System,
vol. 20, pp. 171– 197.10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001131]Search in Google Scholar
[
Turner, MG 2005, ‘Landscape ecology: what is the state of the
science?’, Annual Review of Ecology Evolution System, vol.
36, pp. 319–344.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152614]Search in Google Scholar
[
Urban, DL, O’Neill, RV & Shugart, HH Jr 1987, ‘Landscape
ecology. A hierarchical perspective can help scientists
understand spatial patterns’, Bioscience, vol. 37, no. 2, pp.
119–127.10.2307/1310366]Search in Google Scholar
[
Uuemaa, E, Roosaare, J, Kanal, A & Mander, Ü 2008, ‘Spatial
correlograms of soil cover as an indicator of landscape
heterogeneity’, Ecological Indicators, vol. 8, pp. 783–794.10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.12.002]Search in Google Scholar
[
Viktorov, AS, 1998, Matematicheskaya morfologiya landshafta
(Mathematical Morphology of Landscape), Moscow,
TRATEK.]Search in Google Scholar
[
Walz, U 2011, ‘Landscape Structure, landscape metrics and
biodiversity’, Living Rev. Landscape Res., vol. 5, no. 3.
Available from: http://www.livingreviews.org/lrlr-2011-3
[20.01.2012].10.12942/lrlr-2011-3]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wheatley, M & Johnson, C, 2009, ‘Factors limiting our
understanding of ecological scale’, Ecological Complexity,
vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 150–159.10.1016/j.ecocom.2008.10.011]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wiens, JA 1989, ‘Spatial scaling in ecology’, Functional Ecology,
vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 385–397.10.2307/2389612]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilbanks, TJ & Kates, RW 1999, ‘Global change in local places:
How scale matters’, Climatic Change, vol. 43, no. 3, pp.
601–628.10.1023/A:1005418924748]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wolfram, S 1984, ‘Cellular automata as models of complexity’,
Nature, vol. 311, pp. 419–424.10.1038/311419a0]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, J 1999, ‘Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information
along a scaling ladder’, Canadian Journal of Remote
Sensing, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 367–380.10.1080/07038992.1999.10874736]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, J 2004, ‘Effects of changing scale on landscape pattern
analysis: scaling relations’, Landscape Ecology, vol. 19, no.
2, pp. 125–138.10.1023/B:LAND.0000021711.40074.ae]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, J & David, JL 2002, ‘A spatially explicit hierarchical approach
to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and
applications’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 7–26.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00499-9]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, J & Marceau, D 2002, ‘Modeling complex ecological systems:
an introduction’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 1–6.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00498-7]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, JA & Ye, Q 2000, ‘Dealing with scale in landscape analysis:
An overview’, Geographic Information Sciences, vol. 6, no.
1, pp.1–5.10.1080/10824000009480528]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wu, J & David, JL 2002, ‘A spatially explicit hierarchical approach
to modeling complex ecological systems: theory and
applications’, Ecological Modelling, vol. 153, pp. 7–26.10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00499-9]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yarrow, MM & Salthe, SN 2008, ‘Ecological boundaries in the
context of hierarchy theory’, BioSystems, vol. 92, pp. 233–
244.
10.1016/j.biosystems.2008.03.00118448239]Search in Google Scholar