1. bookVolume 3 (2010): Edizione 1 (June 2010)
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1805-4196
ISSN
1803-2427
Prima pubblicazione
20 Jun 2008
Frequenza di pubblicazione
3 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese
Accesso libero

Structural Versus Functional Habitat Connectivity Measures to Explain Bird Diversity in Fragmented Orchards

Pubblicato online: 08 Aug 2012
Volume & Edizione: Volume 3 (2010) - Edizione 1 (June 2010)
Pagine: 52 - 64
Dettagli della rivista
License
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
1805-4196
ISSN
1803-2427
Prima pubblicazione
20 Jun 2008
Frequenza di pubblicazione
3 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Adriaensen, F., Chardon, J. P., De Blust, G., Swinnen, E., Villalba, S., Gulink, H. & Matthysen, E. (2003). The application of least-cost modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64: 233-247.Search in Google Scholar

Awade, M., Metzger, J. P. (2008). Using gap-crossing capacity to evaluate functional connectivity of two Atlantic rainforest birds and their response to fragmentation. Austral Ecology, 33: 863-871.Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, D., Billeter, R., Aviron, S., Schweiger, O. & Herzog, F. (2007). The influence of thematic resolution on metric selection for biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes. Landscape Ecology, 22: 461-473.Search in Google Scholar

Bailey, D., Schmidt-Entling, M. H., Eberhardt, P., Herrmann, J., Hofer, G., Kormann, U. & Herzog, F. (2010). Effects of habitat amount and isolation on biodiversity in fragmented traditional orchards. Journal of Applied Ecology (in press).10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01858.xSearch in Google Scholar

Baskent, E. Z., Jordan, G. A. (1995). Characterizing spatial structure of forest landscapes. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25: 1830-1849.Search in Google Scholar

Bélisle, M., Desrochers, A. (2002). Gap-crossing decisions by forest birds: An empirical basis for parameterizing spatially-explicit, individual-based models. Landscape Ecology, 17: 219-231.Search in Google Scholar

Bennett, A. F., Hinsley, S. A., Bellamy, P. E., Swetnam, R. D. & Mac Nally, R. (2004). Do regional gradients in land-use influence richness, composition and turnover of bird assemblages in small woods? Biological Conservation, 119: 191-206.10.1016/j.biocon.2003.11.003Search in Google Scholar

Billeter, R., Liira, J., Bailey, D., Bugter, R., Arens, P., Augenstein, I., Aviron, S., Baudry, J., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., Cerny, M., De Blust, G., De Cock, R., Diekötter, T., Dietz, H., Dirksen, J., Dormann, C., Durka, W., Frenzel, M., Hamersky, R., Hendricky, F., Herzog, F., Klotz, S., Koolstra, B., Lausch, A., Le Coeur, D., Maelfait, J. P., Opdam, P., Roubalova, M., Schermann, A., Schermann, N., Schmidt, T., Schweiger, O., Smulders, M. J. M., Speelmans, M., Simova, P., Verboom, J., Van Wingerden, W. K. R. E., Zobel, M. & Edwards, P. J. (2008). Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. A pan-European study. Journal of Applied Ecology 45: 141-150.Search in Google Scholar

Böhning-Gaese, K., González-Guzmán & Brown, H. J. (1998). Constraints on dispersal and the evolution of the avifauna of the Northern Hemisphere. Evolutionary Ecology, 12: 767-783.Search in Google Scholar

Broquet, T., Ray, N., Petit, E., Fryxell, J. M. & Burel, F. (2006). Genetic isolation by distance and landscape connectivity in the American marten (Martes americana). Landscape Ecology, 21: 877-889.Search in Google Scholar

Bunn, A. G., Urban, D. L. & Keitt, T. H. (2000). Landscape connectivity: A conservation application of graph theory. Journal of Environmental Management, 59: 265-278.Search in Google Scholar

Calabrese, J. M., Fagan, W. F. (2004). A comparison-shoppers's guide to connectivity metrics. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2(10): 529-536.Search in Google Scholar

Chardon, J. P., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003). Incorporating landscape elements into a connectivity measure. A case study for the Speckled wood butterfly (Pararge aegeria L.). Landscape Ecology, 18: 561-573.Search in Google Scholar

Desrochers, A., Hannon, S. J. (1997). Gap crossing decisions by forest songbirds during the post-fledging period. Conservation Biology, 11: 1204-1210.Search in Google Scholar

Driezen, K., Adriaensen, F., Rondinini, C., Doncaster, P. & Matthysen, E. (2007). Evaluating least-cost model predictions with empirical dispersal data: A case-study using radiotracking data of hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecological Modelling, 209: 314-322.Search in Google Scholar

Ewers, R. M., Didham, R. K. (2006). Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biological Reviews, 81: 687-699.Search in Google Scholar

Forman, R. T. T., Godron, M. (1986). Landscape Ecology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar

Gillies, C. S., Clair, C. C. S. (2008). Riparian corridors enhance movement of a forest specialist bird in fragmented tropical forest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Volume: 105, Issue: 50, pp. 19774-19779.10.1073/pnas.0803530105260499019017794Search in Google Scholar

Glutz von Blotzheim, U. N. (1997). Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. Band 11-14, Passeriformes. Aula-Verlag, Wiesbaden.Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, B. J. (2003). Is landscape connectivity a dependent or independent variable? Landscape Ecology, 18: 687-699.10.1023/B:LAND.0000004184.03500.a8Search in Google Scholar

Goodwin, B. J., Fahrig, L. (2002). How does landscape structure influence landscape connectivity. Oikos, 99: 552-570.Search in Google Scholar

Greegan, H. P., Osborne, P. E. (2005). Gap-crossing decisions of woodland songbirds in Scottland: an experimental approach. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42: 678-687.Search in Google Scholar

Haas, C. A. (1995). Dispersal and use of corridors by birds in wooded patches on an agricultural landscape. Conservation Biology, 9: 845-854.Search in Google Scholar

Herzog, F., Dreier, S., Hofer, G., Marfurt, C., Schüpbach, B., Spiess, M. & Walter, T. (2005). Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 108: 189-204.Search in Google Scholar

Keitt, T. H., Urban, D. L. & Milne, B. T. (1997). Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology (1/1). Retrieved May 2009, from http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4/ http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art4/10.5751/ES-00015-010104Search in Google Scholar

Kindlmann, P., Burel, F. (2008). Connectivity measures. A review. Landscape Ecology, 23: 879-890.Search in Google Scholar

Kleijn, D., Baquero, R. A., Clough, Y., Díaz, M., De Esteban, J., Fernández, F., Gabriel, D., Herzog, F., Holzschuh, A., Jöhl, R., Knop, E., Kruess, A., Marhsall, E. J. P., Steffan-Dewenter, I., Tscharntke, T., Verhulst, J., West, T. M. & Yela, J. L. (2006). Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecology Letters, 9: 243-254.Search in Google Scholar

Mac Nally, R., Horrocks, G. (2000). Landscape-scale conservation of an endangered migrant: the Swift Parrot Lathamus discolor in its winter range. Biological Conservation, 92: 335-343.Search in Google Scholar

Magle, S. B., Theobald, D. M. & Crooks, K. R. (2009). A comparison of metrics predicting landscape connectivity for a highly interactive species along an urban gradient in Colorado, USA. Landscape Ecology, 24: 267-280.Search in Google Scholar

Matthysen, E., Adriaensen, F. & Dhondt, A. A. (2001). Local recruitment of great and blue tits (Parus major, P. caeruleus) in relation to study plot size and degree of isolation. Ecography, 24: 33-42.Search in Google Scholar

Pope, S. E., Fahrig, L. & Merriam, H. G. (2000). Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology, 81: 2498-2508.Search in Google Scholar

R Development Core Team (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. Retrieved 2009-10-15, from http://www.R-project.orgSearch in Google Scholar

Radford, J. Q., Bennett, A. F. (2007). The relative importance of landscape properties for woodland birds in agricultural environments. Journal of Applied Ecology, 44: 737-747.Search in Google Scholar

Radford, J. Q., Bennett, A. F. & Cheers, G. J. (2005). Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biological Conservation, 124: 317-337.Search in Google Scholar

Schmidt, M. H., Thies, C., Nentwig, W. & Tscharntke, T. (2008). Contrasting responses of arable spiders to the landscape matrix at different spatial scales. Journal of Biogeography, 35: 157-166.Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, C., Fry, G. (2005). Estimating the consequences of land-use changes on butterfly diversity in a marginal agricultural landscape in Sweden. Journal of Nature Conservation, 13: 247-256.Search in Google Scholar

Schweiger, O., Maelfait, J. P., van Wingerden, W., Hendrickx, F, Billeter, R., Speelmans, M., Augenstein, I., Aukema, B.; Aviron, S., Bailey, D., Bukacek, R., Burel, F., Diekötter, T., Dirksen, J., Frenzel, M., Herzog, F., Liira, J., Roubalova, M. & Bugter R. (2005). Quantifying the impact of environmental factors on arthropod communities in agricultural landscapes across organisational levels and spatial scales. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42: 1129-1139.Search in Google Scholar

Stevens, V. M., Verkenne, C., Vandewoestijne, S., Wesselingh, R. A. & Baguette, M. (2006). Gene flow and functional connectivity in the natterjack toad. Molecular Ecology, 15: 2333-2344.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L., Henein, K. & Merriam, G. (1993). Connectivity is a vital element of landscape structure. Oikos, 68: 571-573.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, P. D., Fahrig, L. & With, K. A. (2006). Landscape connectivity. A return to the basics. Conservation Biology, 14: 29-43.Search in Google Scholar

Tischendorf, L., Fahrig, L. (2000a). How should we measure landscape connectivity? Landscape Ecology, 15: 633-641.10.1023/A:1008177324187Search in Google Scholar

Tischendorf, L., Fahrig, L. (2000b). On the usage and measurement of landscape connectivity. Oikos, 90: 7-19.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.900102.xSearch in Google Scholar

Venables, W. N., Ripley, B. D. (2002). Modern Applied Statistics with S. Springer, New York.10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2Search in Google Scholar

Verbeylen, G., De Bruyn, L., Adriaensen, F. & Matthysen, E. (2003). Does matrix resistance influence red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris L. 1758) distribution in an urban landscape? Landscape Ecology, 18: 791-805.Search in Google Scholar

Ward, M. P. (2005). The role of immigration in the decline of an isolated migratory bird population. Conservation Biology, 19: 1528-1536.Search in Google Scholar

Wiens, J. A. (1989). Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology, 3: 385-397.Search in Google Scholar

Wiens, J. A., Van Horne, B. & Noon, B. R. (2002). Integrating landscape structure and scale into natural resource management. In: Liu, J., Taylor, W. W. (Eds.): Integrating Landscape Ecology into Natural Resource Management. pp. 23-67. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge10.1017/CBO9780511613654.005Search in Google Scholar

With, K. A. (2004). Metapopulation dynamics: perspectives from landscape ecology. In: Hanski, I., Gaggiotti, O. (Eds.): Ecology, Genetics and Evolution of Metapopulations. pp. 23-44. Academic Press, San Diego.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, J., Shen, W., Sun, W. & Tueller, P. T. (2002). Empirical patterns of the effects of changing scale on landscape metrics. Landscape Ecology, 17: 761-782.Search in Google Scholar

Zwygart, D. (1983). Die Vogelwelt von Nieder- und Hochstammobstkulturen des Kantons Thurgau. Der Ornithologische Beobachter, 80: 89-104.Search in Google Scholar

Articoli consigliati da Trend MD

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo