[6, P., D. Leat, K. Setzler and G. Stoker. 2002. Toward Holistic Governance: The New Reform Agenda. Basingstoke: Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
[Adler, E. 1992. "The Emergence of Cooperation: National Epistemic Communities and the International Evolution of the Idea of Nuclear Arms Control." International Organization 46, 105-115.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bakvis, H. and L. Juillet. 2004. The Horizontal Challenge: Line Departments, Central Agencies and Leadership. Ottawa: Canadian School of Governance.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bouckaert, G., D. Ormond and B. G. Peters. 2000. A Possible Governance Agenda for Sweden. Helsinki: Ministry of Finance.]Search in Google Scholar
[Buchanan, J. M. and G. Tullock. 1962. The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Caplan, B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400828821]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, T. and P. Laegreid. 2007. Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms. Aldershot; Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Christensen, T. and P. Laegreid. 2001. New Public Management: Transformation of Ideas and Practice. Aldershot: Ashgate.]Search in Google Scholar
[Dente, B., L. Bobbio and A. Spada. 2003. "Government or Governance of Urban Innovation?" DISP 162 (3), 1-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[DiIulio, J. J. 1994. Deregulating Government. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gregory, R. 2004. "All the King's Horses and All the King's Men: Putting the New Zealand Public Sector Together Again.", International Public Management Journal vol.4, 41-58.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heffernan, R. 2003. "Prime Ministerial Predominance?: Core Executive Politics in the United Kingdom." British Journal of Politics and International Relations 5, 347-372.]Search in Google Scholar
[Helmke, G. and S. Levitsky. 2004. "Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda." Perspectives on Politics 2, 725-740.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hood, C. 1991. "A Public Management for All Seasons?" Public Administration 69, 3-19.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, J. D. and C. R. Shipan. 2002. Deliberate Discretion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511804915]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, L. 2004. Den store koordinator. Kobenhavn: Jurist og Økonomi.]Search in Google Scholar
[Klijn, E.-H. and J. Koopenhaan. 2005. Managing Uncertainties in Networks. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Marinetto, M. 2003. "Governing Beyond the Centre: A Critique of the Anglo-Governance School." Political Studies 51, 592-608.]Search in Google Scholar
[Meyers, M. K. and S. Vorsanger. 2004. "Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Implementation of Public Policy." In B. G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds). The Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage, pages.10.4135/9781848608214.n20]Search in Google Scholar
[Morth, U. 2003. Soft Law in Governance and Regulation: An Interdisciplinary Analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mulgan, G. 2000. "Accountability: An Ever-Expanding Concept." Public Administration 78, 555-573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Niskanen, W. 1971. Representative Government and Bureaucracy. Chicago: Aldine / Atherton.]Search in Google Scholar
[OECD. 2007. Performance Management in the OECD Countries. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.]Search in Google Scholar
[O'Toole, L. J. 2007. "Governing Outputs and Outcomes of Governance Networks." In E. Sorenson and J. Torfing (eds). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pages.10.1057/9780230625006_13]Search in Google Scholar
[Olsen, J. P. forthcoming. "The Ups and Downs of Bureaucratic Organization." Annual Review of Political Science 11, 13-37.10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060106.101806]Search in Google Scholar
[Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler. 1991. Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. 2007a. "Performance Management in the Nordic Countries". Paper Prepared for Annual RAKO Conference, Lidingö, Sweden, 11 September.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. 2007b. "Central Agencies and Executive Governance." Paper presented at Joint Workshops of the European Consortium for Political Research, 5-10 May.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. 2004. "Back to the Centre?: Rebuilding the State." The Political Quarterly, Special issue on "Restating the State", 130-140.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. 2005. "Governance and Public Bureaucracy: New Forms of Democracy or New Forms of Control?" Asia-Pacific Journal of Public Administration 26, 3-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. 2001. The Future of Governing. 2nd edn. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.]Search in Google Scholar
[Peters, B. G. and J. Pierre. 2004. Politicization of the Public Service: The Quest for Control. London: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pierre, J. 2000. Governance, Politics and the State. Basingstoke: Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollack, J. K. 1951. "The Primacy of Politics." American Political Science Review 45, 1-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollitt, C. 2003. "Joined Up Government: A Survey." Political Studies Review 1, 34-49.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pollitt, C. and C. Talbot. 2004. Unbundled Government: A Critical Analysis of the Global Trends to Agencies, Quangos and Contractualisaton. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203507148]Search in Google Scholar
[Rokkan, S. 1967. "Norway: Corporate Pluralism." In R. A. Dahl (ed.). Political Oppositions in Western Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press, 70-115.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rose, R. 1974. The Problem of Party Government. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-01854-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Salamon, L. M. 2001. "Introduction." In Salamon (ed.). The Handbook of Policy Instruments. New York: Oxford University Press, 3-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[Savoie, D. J. 2004. Governing from the Centre. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scharpf, F. W. 1988. "The Joint-Decision Trap: Lessons from German Federalism and European Integration." Public Administration 66, 239-278.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schofield, J. 2001. "The Old Ways are the Best?: The Durability and Usefulness of Bureaucracy in Public Sector Management." Organization 8, 77-96.10.1177/135050840181005]Search in Google Scholar
[Sørenson, E. and J. Torfing. 2006. Theories of Democratic Network Governance. London: Palgrave.10.1057/9780230625006]Search in Google Scholar
[Verhoest, K., P. Humphreys and K. Rubecksen. forthcoming. The Autonomy of Public Agencies: A Comparative Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave.]Search in Google Scholar
[Von Mettenheim, K. 1997. Presidential Institutions and Democratic Politics: Comparing Regional and National Contexts. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walsh, H. and J. Stewart. 1992. "Change in the Management of the Public Service." Public Administration 70, 499-518.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wanna, J., L. Jensen and J. De Vries. 2003. Controlling Public Expenditure: The Changing Role of Central Budget Agencies-Better Guardians? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.]Search in Google Scholar
[Whitford, A. B. 2002. "Decentralization and Political Control in Bureaucracy." Journal of Theoretical Politics 14, 167-193.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yesilkagit. K. 2007. "Whose Regulators?: Competing Perspectives on Bureaucratic Autonomy." Paper presented at Biannual Meeting of the European Consortium for Political Research, Pisa, Italy, 6-8 September.10.1007/s11115-008-0054-7]Search in Google Scholar
