[Bem, S.L. (1993). The lenses of gender. Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Berekashvili, N. (2011). Gender bias in Georgian school teachers' attitudes and behavior. In XV European Conference on Developmental Psychology ECDP (pp. 465-474.). Bologna: Medimond International Proceeding.]Search in Google Scholar
[Brophy, J. (1983). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations. Journal of Education Psychology, 75 (5), 631-661.10.1037/0022-0663.75.5.631]Search in Google Scholar
[Carli, L.L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55 (1), 81-99.10.1111/0022-4537.00106]Search in Google Scholar
[Caruthers, L. (2005). Classroom interactions and achievement. Mid-Atlantic Research for Education & Learning. Retrieved from: http://www.mcrel.org/products/noteworthy/noteworthy/loycec.asp http://www.mcrel.org/products/noteworthy/noteworthy/loycec.asp]Search in Google Scholar
[Chapman, A. (2002). Gender Bias in Education. Research Room. Retrieved from: http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/genderbias.html]Search in Google Scholar
[Connell, R.W. (1983). Which way is up? Essays on sex, class and cult ure. Sydney: George Allen & Unwin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Eagly, A.H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior. A social-role interpretation. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ecclees, J. & Blumenfeld, P. (1985). Classroom experiences and student gender: Are there differences and do they matter? In L.C. Wilkinson & C.B. Marret (Eds.), Gender influences in classroom interaction (pp. 79-114). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Good, T.L. & Brophy, J.E. (1987). Looking in classrooms. New York: Harper & Row.]Search in Google Scholar
[Good, T.L. & Findley, M.J. (1985). Sex role expectations and achievement. In J.B. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 271-294). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hallinan, M.T. & Sørensen, A.B. (1987). Ability grouping and sex differences in mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 60 (2), 63-72.10.2307/2112582]Search in Google Scholar
[McCormick, P. (1995). Are girls taught to fail? U.S. Catholic, 60 (2), 38-42.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rosenthal, R. (1994). Interpersonal expectancy effects: A 30-year perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3, 176-179.10.1111/1467-8721.ep10770698]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadker, D. (1999). Gender equity: Still knocking at the classroom door. Educational Leadership, 56 (7), 22-26.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadker, M. & Sadker, D. (1995). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Simon and Schuster.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). The issues of gender bias in elementary and secondary education. The Review of Research in Education, 17 (7), 269-334]Search in Google Scholar
[Scott, E. & McCollum, H. (1993). Making it happen: Gender equitable classrooms. In S.K. Biklen & D. Pollard (Eds.), Gender and Education. Part 1 (pp. 174-190). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Reay, D. (2001). ‘Spice Girls’, ‘Nice Girls’, ‘Girlies’, and ‘Tomboys’: Gender discourses, girls' cultures and femininities in the primary classroom. Gender and Education, 13 (2), 153-166.10.1080/09540250120051178]Search in Google Scholar
[Shelley S.S. (2000). The relationship among teacher expectations, teacher attitudes toward the TAAS, and student achievement. Denton, TX: University of North Texas. Retrieved from: http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2691/m2/1/high_res_d/Dissertation.pdf http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2691/m2/1/high_res_d/Dissertation.pdf]Search in Google Scholar