Logophoricity in discourse

Allen, K. 1998. Meaning and Speech Acts.[Accessed 15 January 2020]. Available at: http://directory.google.com/Top/Society/Philosophy/Philosophy_of_Language/Pragmatics/Speech_ActsSearch in Google Scholar

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Bach, K. 2007. Regression in pragmatics (and semantics). In: N. Burton-Roberts, ed. Pragmatics. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 24-44.10.1057/978-1-349-73908-0_3Search in Google Scholar

Bianchi, V. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In: J. Guéron & L. Tasmovski, eds. Temps et point de vue/Tense and Point of View, Université Paris X - Nanterre, pp. 213-246.Search in Google Scholar

Blackwell, S. E. 2003. Implicatures in Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Bühler, K. 1934/1999. Sprachtheorie. Stuttgart: Lucius and Lucius.Search in Google Scholar

Cappelen, H. and Lepore, E. 2005. Insensitive Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.10.1002/9780470755792Search in Google Scholar

Carston, R. 1999. The semantics/pragmatics distinction: A view from Relevance Theory. In: K. Turner, ed. The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 85–125.Search in Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. A. 1982. Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. 2008. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Studies in Linguistics 2, CISCL Working Papers, pp. 43–59. [Accessed May 19, 2018]. Available at: http://ciscl.media.unisi.it/doc/doc_pub/STiL-2008-vol2.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. 2015. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. In B. Heine – H. Narrog, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 65-78.Search in Google Scholar

Cinque, G. and Rizzi, L. 2016. Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, January 2016.[Accessed 12 April 2019]. Available at: https://internt.ht.lu.se/doc/1461565913.calendarEvents.8294.pdf.0.RizziCinqueAnnualRevLing.pdf/Search in Google Scholar

Clements, G. N. 1975. The Logophoric Pronoun in Ewe: Its Role in Discourse. Journal of West African Languages 2, pp. 141-177.Search in Google Scholar

Corpus of Contemporary American English.[Accessed 5 June 2020]. Available at: https://www.english-corpora.org/cocaSearch in Google Scholar

Culy, Ch. 2002. The Logophoric Hierarchy and Variation in Dogon. In: T. Guildeman and M. Roncador, eds. Reported Discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp. 201-210.10.1075/tsl.52.14culSearch in Google Scholar

Dickey, S. M. 2000. Parameters of Slavic Aspect: A Cognitive Approach. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Search in Google Scholar

Dik, S. C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar I, II. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar

Grice, H. P. 1975. Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, J. L. Morgan, eds., Syntax and Semantics 3, New York: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.Search in Google Scholar

Hagège, C. 1974. Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Societé de Linguistique de Paris 69, pp. 287-310.Search in Google Scholar

Hajičová, E., Panevová, J. and Sgall, P. 1985-1987. Coreference in the Grammar and in the Text: Part I., Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics, vol. 44, pp. 3-32; Part II., vol. 46, pp. 1-11; Part III., vol. 48, pp. 3-12.Search in Google Scholar

Hirschová, M. 2012. Performativnost a gramatické kategorie slovesa. Slovo a slovesnost vol. 73, no.1, pp. 3-12.Search in Google Scholar

Hirschová, M. 2013. Pragmatika v češtině. Praha: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

Hirschová, M. 2017. Česká věta na rozhraní mezi gramatikou a pragmatikou. Praha: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, L. 1984. Toward a New Taxonomy for Pragmatic Inference: Q-Based and R-Based Implicature. In: D. Schiffrin, ed.: Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Washington: Georgetown University Press, pp. 11-42.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y. 1994/2007. The Syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Digital version 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y. 2000. Discourse anaphora: Four theoretical models. Journal of Pragmatics vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 151-176.10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00041-7Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y. 1994/2007. The syntax and Pragmatics of Anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Digital version 2007.Search in Google Scholar

Huang, Y. 2013. Logophoricity and Neo-Gricean Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. In: A. Capone et al., eds. Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology 2, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, pp. 217-241.10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_8Search in Google Scholar

Jakobson, R. 1971. Shifters, Verbal Categories, and the Russian Verb. In: Selected Writings, vol. II, The Hague: Mouton, pp. 130-147.10.1515/9783110873269.130Search in Google Scholar

Kaplan, D. 1977/1989. Demonstratives. An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives. In: J. Almog and J. Perry et al., eds. Themes from Kaplan. New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 481-563.Search in Google Scholar

Karlík, P. 2014. Gramatika a lexikon češtiny. Brno: Masarykova univerzita.Search in Google Scholar

Koopman, H. and Sportiche, D. 1989. Pronouns, Variables, and Logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20, pp. 555-588.Search in Google Scholar

Koschmieder, E. 1934. Nauka o aspektach czasownika polskiego w zarysie: proba syntezy. Wilno: Towarzystwo przyjaciol nauk.Search in Google Scholar

Kucarov, I. K. 2007. Teoretična gramatika na bălgarskija ezik. Morfologija. Plovdiv: Universitetsko Izdatelstvo Paisij Chilendarski.Search in Google Scholar

Kuno, S. 1972. Pronominalization, Reflexivization, and Direct Discourse. Linguistic Inquiry vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 161-195.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G. 1987. Meaning and the English Verb. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Leech, G. and Svartvik, J. 1975. A Communicative Grammar of English. Harlow: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

Levinson, S. C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5526.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Mailing, J. 1984. Non-Clause-Bounded Reflexives in Modern Icelandic. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 211-241.10.1007/BF00627706Search in Google Scholar

Martí, L. 2006. Unarticulated constituents revisited. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 135-166.10.1007/s10988-005-4740-4Search in Google Scholar

Mey, J. L. 2009. Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. 2nd edition, Oxford: Elsevier. pp. 206-213.Search in Google Scholar

Panevová, J., et al. 2014. Mluvnice současné češtiny 2. Praha: Karolinum.Search in Google Scholar

Perry, J. 1998. Indexicals, Contexts and Unarticulated Constituents. In: D. Westerstahl et al., eds. Computing Natural Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications, pp. 1-11.Search in Google Scholar

Rècanati, F. 2002. Unarticulated Constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 391-434.Search in Google Scholar

Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. London: Collier-Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. 1983. Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.Search in Google Scholar

Rizzi, L. 1997. The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery. In: L. Haegman, ed. Elements of Grammar. A Handbook of the Generative Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 281-337.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7Search in Google Scholar

Ross, J. R. 1970. On Declarative Sentences. In: R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum, eds. Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham: Ginn and Company, pp. 222-277.Search in Google Scholar

Safir, K. 2003. Person, context and perspective. Rivista di linguistica vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 107-153.10.1177/1971400903016SP131Search in Google Scholar

Scatton, E. A. 1984. A Reference Grammar of Modern Bulgarian. Columbus: Slavica Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, P. 2003. A Plea for Monsters. Linguistics and Philosophy vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 29-120.10.1023/A:1022225203544Search in Google Scholar

Searle, J. R. 1976. A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-23.10.1017/S0047404500006837Search in Google Scholar

Sells, P. 1987. Aspects of Logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 445-479.Search in Google Scholar

Siewierska, A. 2004. Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812729Search in Google Scholar

Speas, M. 2004. Evidentiality, Logophoricity and the Syntactic Representation of Pragmatic Features. Lingua vol. 114, issue 3, pp. 255-276.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00030-5Search in Google Scholar

Stanley, J. 2007. Language in Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Stirling, L. 1993. Switch-reference and discourse representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511597886Search in Google Scholar

Thráinsson, H. 1976. Reflexives and Subjunctives in Icelandic. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Meeting of North Eastern Linguistic Society. Montreal Working Papers in Linguistics vol. 6, Montreal: McGill University, pp. 225-239.Search in Google Scholar

Vikner, S. 1985. Reichenbach Revisited: One, Two, or Three Temporal Relations? Acta linguistica Hafniensia vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 81-98.10.1080/03740463.1985.10415447Search in Google Scholar